But he was the little magician. He was the inventor,” (Nabokov 1028). Douglas falls short on this mark as a writer, as he doesn’t do any shifting of attention or anything along those lines during his narrative, however as a character in his own narrative he is a brief sort of magician “It was understood, among all who came, that there must be as little display about it as possible. It was necessary to keep our religious masters at St. Michael’s unacquainted with the fact, that, instead of spending the Sabbath in wrestling, boxing, and drinking whisky, we were trying to learn how to read..,” (Douglas 81), this would fall under magician under the lines of how he is teaching several slaves, not just those under his current master’s ownership, in the vicinity of where he is during this time in his narrative in what can only be assumed to be secrecy. This is a dangerous trick in how teaching slaves to become literate is highly illegal to begin with, but how it is also tied to eventual liberation of slaves, so as a character he does live up to the magician role; albeit shakily, but since this is not a ploy used in his actual writing, it falls under himself as a …show more content…
But he was the little magician. He was the inventor,” (Nabokov 1028). Douglas does meets the mark of inventor as a writer, as well as a character, even more so as a character in his narrative then when he is writing it, but in both he does. “The week before our intended start, I wrote several protections, one for each of us.” (Douglas 87), when Douglas and his fellow slaves are planning to escape, he forges writs of protection in case if either him or his companions are stopped and questioned about their destination. As a writer the reason he met the criteria as an inventor, is how he wrote a narrative on slavery, in the point of view as a slave during the time of slavery, when such a thing would be hard to find published, if even privately as a journal or in some other