Analysis Of Tristram Mcpherson's Why I Am A Vegan

Improved Essays
Tristram McPherson enthusiastically sets out to prove that killing animals under nearly any circumstance is morally wrong. In “Why I am Vegan”, he lays out a multitude of different reasons which it is wrong to kill even painlessly. McPherson has several very valid and reasonable ideas however they lack any type of support as to why they should be upheld. McPherson spends a lot of the second section considering the autonomy and future of the animals; however, more importantly he compares the killing of animals to the killing of humans. McPherson does not provide adequate reasoning for why the practice of killing animals is morally wrong. I am going to show that it is morally ok to end the life of an animal if it is done humanly. This is going …show more content…
The title of McPhersons work is ‘Why I am a Vegan’ which relates the majority of the work to why killing animals and using their products is wrong. That being said, I would assume almost anyone would find it troubling if someone thought it was ok to kill other humans; this is because humans have rights that animals do not. We have a duty to animals to treat them justly and humanly but they don’t have rights equivalent to ours. McPherson relates his examples to humans so we would be able to relate to the examples and be able to have perspective, however it doesn’t work in this argument. McPherson states that “killing typically interferes dramatically with the victim’s autonomy” yes this is true for humans and it is also true for animals (McPherson 5). He also states “it can be wrong to deprive a person of a valuable future” again this is true for humans and animals even though they can’t perceive or value it (McPherson 6). Where the problem arises is the fact that humans and animals are inherently different. Humans have a vastly different and more complex idea of autonomy and also a greater sense of their future. This being so it puts humans on a separate level than animals. We as humans don’t necessarily look at ourselves on equal standing with the squirrel running across the road trying to avoid oncoming traffic. Over hundreds of years the human species has evolved and taken control of the lesser species, distancing ourselves from them as a result. The relation to humans also fails because being human we value other humans lives more than any other lifeform. This is because they are our own kind, people generally value the lives of their own family members over a stranger’s, humans valuing humans is just on a much larger scale. For example, if someone had a gun to the head of your mom and a complete stranger and unfortunately one had to die most people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Laughter has been said to be the best medicine of all. This medicine, however, cannot cure the effectiveness of an argument and instead can be seen to poison it in some cases. In Laura Fraser’s “Why I Stopped Being a Vegetarian,” Fraser depicts personal incidents of dabbling in vegetarianism and uses this to assert that people should not be vegetarian and instead decrease the amount of meat consumed. Though humor may then seem to be the appropriate method of conveying her opinion, it is often detrimental towards her argument because it causes her ideas to seem nonsensical and often apathetic towards those who wholeheartedly believe in vegetarianism.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) The purpose of “Meatless Monday” is to raise awareness of the detrimental environmental impact of eating meat, preserve precious natural resources and to encourage people to help slow climate change: “If being the number one contributor to the most serious threat facing the planet (global warming) isn't enough, what is?”. I would say that the idea if the Meatless Monday is great and I would definitely participate. Each person can decide what is the reason for him to participate – the described by Jonathan Foer contemporary conventional factory farming conditions and animal’s suffering or the fact that it causes unintended health consequences and encompasses also environmental problems. “Not responding is a response - we are equally responsible for what we don't do.”…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Pollan, a writer/activist, fights for his right to animals as he sees fit. First, Pollan proclaims multiple points about how animals are different from animals. One being that animals eat other animals in nature, and so Pollan questions why can’t we do the same. He then reitterates this by saying,” Animals kill one another all the time. Why treat animals any more ethically than they treat one another?”(Pollan 365) This shows how the author feels…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, according to a research by Jim Motavalli in which he examined the contradiction of vegetarianism, he put forward that environmental strategy and priorities are broader and more flexible, while animal rights’ strategy and priorities were narrower and often more alienating in their absolutism. Unlike animal rights advocates, many environmentalists are easier to be satisfied diet-wise if people just collectively reduced meat consumption, rather than a wholly vegan diet. This is because environmentalists, who tend to protect wild animals, are not primarily motivated by sentimentalism or compassion over the suffering of individual non-human animals. He concluded that the environmental movement should begin to more openly acknowledge…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In January, 2000 Laura Fraser wrote the article “Why I Stopped Being a Vegetarian” for Salon magazine. Fraser is an author published in several national magazines including The New York Times, Vogue, and O: the Oprah magazine. Attempting to reach an audience of either new or long term vegetarians/vegans, Fraser discusses her journey of changing her vegetarian lifestyle of 15 years to quitting entirely. She happened to write this article in the beginning of the year while most are advancing their new year's resolutions. Perhaps she was trying to convince newly vegetarians or vegans not to continue with their resolutions, or maybe it was all just a coincidence of timing. While Fraser is trying to dissuade her audience from being vegetarians,…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It posits that because predation deprives an animal of its life, it is an unethical partnership and if humans and animals were to be considered truly morally equal, humans would be obligated to interfere with these unethical natural relationships and prevent this suffering. Humans would for example have the obligation to protect gazelles from lions in the same fashion as humans would protect small children from lions, as Regan allows no distinction between humans and animals. Because there is no current system of policing the natural world, so the argument goes, humans are failing their ethical duty. This implies that there must not be an assignment of rights to animals and that Regan’s stance is…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to Global warming, being a vegetarian should be turned to as a first resort rather…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If their lives have less value than that of humans, and their deaths would benefit humans, then killing and eating them is justified.1 The joy humans feel when eating meat outweighs the negatives of extinguishing of animal life, whether humane or not. My view on this issue closely aligns with those of Alastair Norcross, the author of “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” Eating meat that is the result of factory farming is morally wrong, and a moral person shouldn’t be taking pleasure from the products of torture.3 Almost no one can feign ignorance of the issues; videos of abuses have surfaced online, or been broadcasted through documentaries and by PETA, so anyone with access to social media or the Internet is aware that these methods of slaughter are not ethical. In the United States, the overabundance of food options and grocery stores indicates that we no longer need to hunt and gather to survive. Meat has become a luxury item since the vitamins and proteins it may provide us with can be gleaned from other sources. Frey cites animals as having lesser value because of their lack of agency, however, the mere fact that animals cannot be moral agents does not exclude them from being moral patients. Humans need to exercise their agency, be morally responsible and give animals consideration because of their status as moral patients and their ability to suffer.3 This…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no doubt that food is the paramount needs for human beings because food provides nutrients for human and without food human can’t survived in the world. In general, there are many different ways to get nutrients such as fruit, vegetable and animals meat but as we live in a developed science and technology society all you need is money, you can buy any food you want even though delivery food to you houses. As the matter of facts, food industries are mass produce food with chemicals that can make the food stay for a period of time and the price attracted for people to buy more and it turns out that meat is more cheaper than vegetables. However, in the essay of “ Against Meat” written by Jonathan Safran Foer, he described his experience of became a vegetarianism and the influence that he…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are omnivores, which means that they eat both plants and animals. Ultimately, the human can decide whether or not they are going to consume animal meat. I am analyzing the article “Against Meat” in the They Say I say collection of articles. Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his experiences with his struggles of becoming a vegetarian. He gives the intended audience and inside look on how making dietary choices are often difficult, and how it has positively impacted his life, as well as keeping his morals and values in check. I found this interesting because Foer and I both share some of the same views on the food industry and what we choose to put in our bodies. Humans are very uneducated on the food industry, and should research different…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1990, author Wendell Berry released an essay titled “The Pleasures of Eating”. The essay focused on the responsibilities of eating, which includes self-awareness regarding what one’s consuming. Berry discusses how to eat responsibly throughout his piece, often citing the hidden dangers of the food industry, which includes the unjustifiable treatment of animals. Berry uses the rhetorical appeals in relation to these matters which allows him to connect and convey his message more strongly toward Americans, especially those living more rural lifestyles.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    David Zinzenko’s article “Don’t Blame the Eater” (Originally published on November 23, 2002 on the New York Times) talks about the increase in obesity due to the fast food industry. This text came about kids suing McDonalds for making them fat. In the article, the author understands where the kids are coming from “because I used to be one of them.” Due to him understanding what these kids have went through, Zinzenko’s attempts to make a justifiable justification by expressing how coming to an empty home with no one to make them a home cooked meal gives them no other option than to go to a fast food place that was affordable. He also talks about the fact that if you were to go down anywhere in America you would end up finding one of the 13,000…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you ever hear that humankind used to be animals. Also (http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-we-kill-animals) explains that animals have feelings too. Would you kill your own pet? We don’t need to eat animals to survive. Over 71% of people agree that animals should not get killed. I know animals taste good like KFC accept there are a lot of chemicals in fast food. All you need to remember is that 29% say it’s okay to kill animals it is your decision to choose which side you’re on. In…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical reasons behind embracing the veganism culture involve the exploitation of animals. Vegans believe that it is unethical to consume animal body parts or use them for clothing or any other household items. The torture and killing of animals for any reason, be it for research purposes, entertainment, or for its products is against veganism. As such, vegans feel guilt when eating animal products or meat coming from animals that have been killed or tortured. They believe that it is ethically wrong for people to put their welfare or the desire for animal products over the well-being of the animal.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vegan Diet Essay

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    vegans, this level is no problem to achieve: 1 cup of peas has almost 9 grams;…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays