Instead statements such as “quote” are thrown around, often side-by-side with stories of time-traveling Cold War spies or UFOs. The narrative revels in this, mixing tales that would be more at home in a pulp magazine in the same breath as the far more textually supported hypotheses of back-room dealings with terrorists. Ghosts of wildly disreputable websites dredged up from the deep web and the protagonist’s own eyes provide equal amounts of a patchwork pointing to some nebulous wrongness in the world, but neither are able to clarify what that might be. As multiple critics can attest to, this style of writing is nothing new for Pynchon, yet it reaches new depths in a double, triple-cross of mental toying, for both the characters and the narrative …show more content…
“quote about walking kids to school.” A technology billionaire may have helped the United States government stage 9/11. Reality might not exist. Someone did kill a government agent who tried to leave his black-ops life behind him and another person was murdered in the crossfire somewhere in-between. But Maxine does not vow to bring the responsible parties to justice, nor does she resign herself to fear that she or her family are the next names on a hit list. The idea that it is something worthy of her full attention, after finding rotting corpses and getting into shoot-outs, is made irrevocably null. And so the weight given to what might have happened disappears. According to “critic”, it is not unusual for Pynchon to leave fantastical plot threads unanswered. Here, that they are left unanswered is the answer. To quote (whoever, wherever), “quote.” A sharp bit of the realism genre to end with certainly, but one that speaks volumes. Good intrigue is integral to a detective story and one that is held to a form of realism will refrain from letting the reader know every secret. In Bleeding Edge, the metaphorical rug is pulled from under the reader. No, the reader will not be told whether or not 9/11 was an inside job. No, it does not matter if time travel is real. In the real world, we may never know who planned a horrible occurrence nor would that knowledge enact a better outcome, it says. Pynchon creates a underworld that could not