An Absolute Resolution In Thomas Hobbs's Leviathan

Improved Essays
In Thomas Hobbs’s Leviathan, he asserts that to have order in a society there must be an absolute sovereignty to defend against war and conflicts and that within a society, there must be regulation to avoid internal conflict. Hobbs theorizes we must give up our individual rights to a greater governing authority and that doing so is essential to our survival. Indeed, his assertion is valid because human instinct tends to be self-interested; humans will do whatever it takes to survive, so an absolute power is necessary to ensure order.
We must give up our natural right to avoid conflict within an individual. Hobbes states, “war of every one against every one,” which means that everyone has the same interest, which is survival. Human does everything to survive, example, when you put a group of people on an island with food for each individual. One will eventually try to take another individual possessing, to ensure their survival. These are not just within human, animals and we called
…show more content…
It will cause conflict, Hobbes states, “some form of “mixed” government with different branch of government holding different components of political authority, or government…and the people.” This is a valid statement because we have seen throughout history why mixed form of government cannot with stand together. Example is our own nation, Democratic and Republic so much conflict has risen due to the different ideology of running the government. Centuries ago we had a political party called Whig, which had disappeared due to other parties coming and take over them. Our nation has been facing such issues which creates conflict among individuals became one may believe one way and another may believe the opposite way. This creates conflict in governemt and in society. When being in a government where citizens don’t have similar view in government will create major conflict in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hobbes view, if the sovereign can easily be overthrown, then you don’t really have a sovereign. They are, in a sense, immune (something close to a dictator). For Hobbes, where there is no rule there is no justice. Without a legal system in place, there is no conception of justice. The only way to make sure our selfishness doesn’t get out of control is an absolute…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who do not share the views of those in government do not receive any benefit and may face negative actions taken against them such as imprisonment or violence if they protest or speak out against them. The lack of true representation for all in community raises problems because the community would not truly be satisfied as a whole. Only those who benefit from the decisions of the government would be satisfied by being in the…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Leviathan of Hobbes proposes a system of supremacy that a supreme or invincible ruler controls. Meanwhile, Locke's Second Treatise of Government presents a government that is dependable or responsible to its people with restrictions on the supremacy or power of the sovereign. Furthermore, according to Hobbes, the "state of nature" is both extremely a cruel setting and oddly formed or structured. Hobbes recognizes that we have natural laws that exist, but he mostly talks about the "state of nature" as a place of total or absolute independence. However, what like Spiderman's uncle said, with great power comes great responsibility.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What are two problems of the Great Compromise according to the anti-federalists In order to fix the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, fifty-five delegates met in Philadelphia in 1787 and debated over the political representation in Congress. Because the delegates concerned more about their own states’ interests, the Constitutional Convention faced several problems that need a lot of works to create a Great Compromise that could resolve the delegates’ disagreement and have them to sign on the Constitution. According to the Anti-Federalists, there were two problems of the Great Compromise that were the population between large and small states, and the slaves’ population between the north and the south.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animosity In Night

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Humans are creatures that have evolved and become more civil throughout time. Animals on the other hand, are wilder and will do anything to survive. In the nonfictional novel Night, by Elie Wiesel, the Elie experiences the animosity humans can have for each other when they are desperate. The survival of the fittest is one of the oldest rules known in the history of Earth.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality It is a human instinct to prioritize their own well being before others. We are constantly confronted with situations where we as humans have to take action for our own well being. In the book, “Night” by Elie Wiesel, he shares his own traumatic experience of the Holocaust. The Holocaust was a genocide of 12 million people, such as Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, basically anyone who is different and wouldn’t fit into Adolf Hitler’s image of a perfect society. This demonstrates the cruelty that a human being can impose against one another.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes believes that a powerful sovereign that is not part of the social contract is the only way to govern people, be in control, and have order in the country; he thinks that because he believes that people will be so fearful of the sovereign and death that they will not cause any problems. However, James Madison, Plato, and Martin Luther King Jr. seem to for the most part disagree with him. I personally disagree with Hobbes, and I agree with Madison, Plato, and King. Hobbes claims that Social unity and Civil peace are established through the commonwealth in the social contract.…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This creates tensions between authorities and people under them, because the people have less to relate to and all their interests are not being…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes seeks to refute the argument of Machiavelli, that the best governments are those of usurpation or those taken and maintained by any means necessary, in order to preserve the sovereignty of government after England had been on the verge of civil war. In order to refute the argument for one in favor of a representative, sovereign government, he begins by describing the reasons for a civil government. He then explains the existence of the natural laws and their applications to governing in order to prove that a sovereign government is the best form. Finally, he lays an idealistic foundation upon which sovereign governments should be built in order to be truly beneficial. Hobbes begins by justifying the formation of a civil…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reaching a compromise is important so that all factions have their ideals implemented. Although this often results in a status quo bias, it impedes majority and minority tyranny from developing. Government promotes compromise between the majority and minority groups. The problem of factions is solved by forcing factions to compete with each other. Fragmented democratic institutions are set­up to allow federal laws to be passed.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays