Thomas Hobbes Modern Authorianism

Improved Essays
Throughout time many philosophers have created their own ideas of what our body politic should look like, who should rule, under what extend and as time has passed these ideas have juristically changed. Many philosophers believe that their view is what would be best for all societies. Thomas Hobbes believed in the idea of Modern Authorianism, which is very different than the idea of Modern Reform Liberalism. Modern Reform Liberalism, though this theory does have its flaws as well, is the best method to use when it comes to the running of a stable society. The problem of passionate men is one that all philosophers come to find; the modern authorianism view of this was that we are all self interested, anti-social beings. This is not necessarily …show more content…
Just because we socialize, it does not mean that our self-interest goes away; we would be socializing because of this. Our socializing is because of our own need to succeed; we need others to survive and this survival depends on the connections that we make with others as time goes on. For example we cannot gather all of what we need to live simply by being by oneself we need those around us. Our self-interest is sprouted from this, so yes our problem is that we are all self-interested but we do not have the problem of being anti-social. When running a society and trying to solve the problem of passionate men there needs to be a way to ensure that everyone is acting accordingly. With this Hobbes formed his idea of having a social contract. Citizens would sign a contract giving their rights to a Leviathan. As long as what they did, did not interfere with what the Leviathan viewed as dimmable then they had their freedom. Hobbes defended this idea was saying that it was in a signed social contract and the people have given their consent because of this he also believed that the scope of this rule was unlimited. Even though Hobbes …show more content…
There needs to be equal forms of public services, such as roads, schools, churches, recreational centers and parks. These should all be included in equality because people no matter their economic status should have access to these features. Though it would be okay to have things like private schools, if they were not funded by the state. There would not be entire quality but just equality of opportunity. So the standards of the law, rights and liberties would all be equal to all, no matter their stance in society. With equality there around a society there should also be no inbuilt hate, either political, race, or social wise. In a society where everyone is not required to be inheritably equal there are going to be discrepancies between each class but they should still have the possibilities of moving up in the society. Since there are many ways that one can fall into terrible situations, it would be the job of the government to try to help and maintain this equality even if it is just for a short period. Things such as welfare and food stamps would be supplied but with conditions. The government would help to get individuals back to the place they once were, this helps to maintain equality with a bit of assistance until one is able to do it themselves. Over all the maintaining of equality would be both personal and government wise. Personal because as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The founders of the Declaration of Independence sought to create a government that would be formed from the ideas and concepts that they had encountered through their various readings and studies. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are by far the most influential thinkers of the Constitution and continue to affect American thought even today. Many of John Locke’s ideas directly correlate with those included in the Declaration of Independence yet they are reworded to suit the needs of the new government.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without a ruler, he would say people would go crazy and kill each other. To try and prevent this, Thomas Hobbes came up with the Social Contract. The Social Contract had to be signed by the people. With signing this, the people gave up their individual rights, for order and law. Overall, Thomas Hobbes believed in Monarchy.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 22: Enlightenment and Revolution Assessment –Research Worksheet Directions: Completion of this worksheet is a required part of your assessment for this unit. Please type into this document and email it to your teacher in the same email as the Facebook profile. Thomas Hobbes Where was he born? Thomas Hobbes was born in Westport, in 5th April 1588.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1650 to 1800, European philosophers started to think differently about old ideas of government, economics, and religion; this led to a period known as the Enlightenment. The intellectuals of this era were called philosophes, and they believed that everyone is born with natural rights. However, many philosophes had different ideas on what to do with these freedoms and how to distribute power. Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, and Voltaire were all philosophes with different main ideas. John Locked believed that power comes from the people.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For a while, the constraints of civilized society keep things peaceful, but soon their system unravels into brutal chaos” (Pojman, 67-68), this is an excerpt that Pojman discussed pertaining to the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding. This quote exemplifies Thomas Hobbes idea on the state of nature and how there can be no structure and stability without a governing force. Another philosopher that challenges Hobbes’ ideas is John Locke, who believes humans would be capable of keeping stability and structure without the social contract to the government. I will prove how Hobbes’ idea is significantly better than Locke’s theory by talking about equality, liberty, rights and morality. I completely agree with Thomas Hobbes and how humans would be incapable of governing themselves which is why we need social structure.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Primarily, society should offer equal opportunities so that every citizen has the chance to succeed. W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm state, “It’s most important to provide equality of opportunity, not equality of results.” (63). If every citizen has an equal opportunity up to a point,…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Slavery Right Or Wrong

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The idea of equality can never be truly met because as individuals grow toward adulthood, there becomes more of an amount of diversity in society due to differences between the rich and powerful, and the poor and…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes means that in a state of nature envy and desire constitute humans to live for self-preservation fearing for their lives living in a state of constant warfare. He goes on to say, "no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; and which is worst of all, continuall feare, and danger of violent death; And the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."(Leviathan). Hobbes has a very pessimistic view on life itself saying people who aren’t living under some sort of structuralized power don’t have knowledge to know right from wrong or good from evil and have nothing to look forward too, and for this seek peace to end their fears of a morbid…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He believed that society in order to be successful had to be ruled by a strict system of government such as absolute monarchy. In Hobbes’s dissertation “The Leviathan”(1651) a book where he expresses his views he explains that a law of nature was "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life” (Hobbes, 1651, ch14/XIV, p. 64). The law of nature was a broad principle which was discovered through experience and expected to be to be followed in everyday life. These laws encouraged self preservation and disapproved any doings damaging or negative to human life such a rebellions which could result in civil…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays