Rousseau's Discourse On Inequalities

Great Essays
In the Second Discourse on Inequality, Jean Jacque Rousseau outlined the origin and development of private property. The formation of the hut is the first step towards the ultimate creation of society as families and communities start to form. Unlike savage man who’s primary motivation was self-preservation, civilized man embraced amour propre as they begin to compare their strengths and abilities of others. Although Rousseau argues that the invention of private property is not natural, it is inevitable as it becomes a necessity due to certain circumstances such as metallurgy and agriculture. Furthermore, the inequalities of property established a division between the wealthy versus the poor and played a significant role in the creation of …show more content…
Although complicated tasks were divided among workers, the workers become more dependent on one another. The division of labor among individuals allowed them to transform land into property, however an unequal distribution of resources emerged as not all individuals held the same talents and abilities as one another. Therefore, the use of resources were unequal since some individuals could benefit by being naturally gifted at their craft while others could find it difficult to survive in a nonsufficient market depending the needs of that community. The institution of property, according to Rousseau, is what adds to the political and social inequalities. It is important to note that Rousseau does not necessarily believe that property is the cause of these inequalities rather he points to the inequality of property as the main driven force behind …show more content…
The first revolution focused on man using resources and tools to create the hut and eventually a family. As technology developed, humans altered their behavior and adapted to a new environment with more defining gender roles that not only made women more subservient men, but also promoted social inequality. Unlike savage man who dedicated his time to either searching for food or sleeping, civilized man had more leisure time as the tasks that savage man once undertook were now being shared among men and women. Dancing and celebrations at village festivals allowed individuals to interact with one another, however that led to the inevitable embrace of amour propre. While savage man only cared about self-preservation, civilized man started to compare himself to others and sought the approval what others thought of him. Although Rousseau states that the development of private property occurred by mere chance, he explains the role that these revolutions played in influencing the social and political structures of modern society. The division of labor, for example, reinforced the social inequalities of men as an equal distribution of property could not be rewarded to each man. In an effort to prevent a war between the wealthy and the poor, a political society was formed with the poor believing that their freedom would be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau explains how a reset button is needed for politics at his time because the natural state of man has been compromised by the self-indulgence and dependent nature of politics. After man had strayed from the set of rules laid down by god/nature he was no longer self-sufficient and free but was enslaved by manmade laws that enforced inequality. Rousseau criticizes the idea of property “The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying 'this is mine ', and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society” (Rousseau). In this statement Rousseau claims that the idea of property is one of the origins of inequality, as man claimed the land as his own and began exploiting nature. Rousseau’s call for a reset button on political ethics is at a disagreement with Machiavelli’s idea, where Machiavelli urges the Prince to recognize and utilize the lapses in human nature.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Property is an important component of the divide between the rich and the lower class. “The Unequal Distribution of Property” by Thomas Skidmore explains how workers have an unequal opportunity to obtain a right to property, a part of the definition of being a citizen. They are in their own form of “slavery”, in the sense that without working, they have nothing and are unable to achieve in life. Skidmore further reveals that “labor is the sole resource the poor have by which to maintain their existence”. The wealthy only are concerned about them making money and keeping power in government and other forms of high ranks.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These man that now have reached a civil society are now in competition and can see there is always going to be someone higher up the ladder then them. This establishes new social classes and civil man now has a reason to have enemies. In the end however, political power turns around and enslaves all (rich and poor) and this is where Rousseau predicts, “Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The essay will conclude that society is both progressive in one sense and yet corrupting in another sense depending upon the extent to which it fosters the positive values of community, and the extent to which it may degenerate if these values are not developed properly. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM, ANOMIE AND ALTRUISM. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM Rousseau’s Social Contract (1762) presents a view of society as corrupting, by describing the ways in which the transition from living freely, to living enslaved by the rules of society decays the virtue of man. Before there was civilisation, people lived peaceful and innocent lives, in which they strove to sustain their own contentment and absolute freedom. In the ‘state of nature’, man was free to do as he wished,…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The specific thoughts of Rousseau and Mill on freedom, the significance of social contracts, individual versus social freedom, and government’s role…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is always going to be someone who is bigger and better than you.” This phrase that many children are told is true; however, does it have to control the way society acknowledges each person? As civilizations grew, social hierarchies became more prevalent. Critics like Jean-Jacques Rousseau started to point out how society has created “moral” inequalities which is not natural to man’s state. In Rousseau’s essay, The Discourse of Inequality, he points out how society has caused men to put each other in an unjustifiable category of inequality.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, Rousseau believed in the equity within the members of the society. He showed the close relationship between equality and freedom in his writing, especially in his book “The Social Contract”(1762). According to him, the nature of man is resistant to inequality by nature; it does not have to confront others, asking them to prove anything. Far from seeking concrete ways to achieve a society that respects freedom, Rousseau seeks a universal standard by which to judge the legitimacy of companies. According to his beliefs, “men are born free, their liberty belong to them, and no one…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contemplating the other side of that argument, we look at the potential downfalls of inequality as described by Rousseau, “The origin of society and laws, which gave new fetters to the weak and new forces to the rich, irretrievably destroyed natural liberty, established forever the law of property and of inequality, changed adroit usurpation into an irrevocable right, and for the profit of a few ambitious men henceforth subjected the entire human race to labor, servitude and misery” (Rousseau 79). Ah! Now we can also discard the notion that inequality is inherently good. What is left is the argument of both or neither, which, in reality, are the same…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of freedom in Jean Jacque Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762) is present throughout the book and Rousseau’s own, personal understanding of freedom underpins his argument for his ideal state. In this essay I will argue that individual citizens aren’t truly free in every sense in Rousseau’s state as the sovereign has complete dominion over public matters and due to the sovereign explicitly being composed of every citizen, this could lead to nearly every problem being deemed within the public realm. Furthermore, one cannot be individually free, in my opinion, when one cannot voice dissent against the prevailing convention of society, as is the case in Rousseau’s state. To argue this thesis effectively I will explore what freedom means…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx examine the social change that nations go through either as a result of democracy diminishing Aristocratic ages or because of the wide spread of industrial capitalism. However, Marx and Tocqueville observe the impact of these social changes on the community differently. Marx writings are about how the European world was changing during his lifespan. He observes how the beginning of the Industrial Revolution creates an increase in the level of economic production, but also an immense increase of inequality in a society. On the contrary, Tocqueville analyzes the relationship between equality and liberty during the democratic ages vs. the aristocratic ages.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Equality disappeared, property was introduced (Rousseau 9)”. Rousseau genuinely possessed empathy for the health, happiness, and labor of “good men” while Machiavelli did…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays