Ragged Road To Abolition Summary

Improved Essays
In The Ragged Road to Abolition, Gigantino redefines the concept of slavery in New Jersey by describing how, despite being a northern state, slavery remained and expanded as their economy grew. He proves throughout his writing that slavery was always prevalent and prevailed over time despite abolitionist efforts. By doing so he shows how slavery evolved to fit the needs of the New Jersey’s growing industrial and international economy. Because of this new need for slaves performing a different type of labor, slavery continued into the early nineteenth century. New Jersey’s geographical location allowed slavery to expand over many years because of the transformation of their economy from being solely agricultural to industrial, overall with a …show more content…
So now the once heavy agricultural economy is being overshadowed with a new type of labor which is also heavily dependent on slaves. These now bound laborers reflect “the precise timing of its (the North’s) shift to a capitalistic system of exchange” 132. So now jobs such as blacksmiths, ship building, and carpentry are becoming very popularized. In the north, these now became the common jobs which replaced the need to rely solely on agriculture. However the misconception that often arises is that these jobs were usually done by free blacks. Historian Allan Kulikoff calls this the “process of proletarianization” which “made free blacks a cheap labor force to fuel the growing manufacturing industry” 32. Although these blacks could have been freed or are promised freedom, their work and treatment is no different from a slave in the sense that they were often overworked and barely paid. We often hear how blacks from the south often move to the north for in order to have this sense of freedom. But most of the time this is not true to say that Northern states were more free than in the South. In reality both used the bondage of slaves to their benefits but in different contexts. Thus, the labor prevalent in the North is usually performed by unpaid black laborers who, in hopes of gaining their uncertain freedom, work …show more content…
Although abolitionist efforts were more prevalent in the north, they failed to produce a more rapid change due to the economic benefits that came with slavery. This is shown with the actions of Quakers who in ideals supported the abolition of slavery but in practicality did not. They instead manipulated the term slavery as “parental guidance” to counter the fact that they were using slaves for their own benefit. They also supported gradual abolition instead of instant manumission because they could not adjust financially to the absence of slaves. Slavery in the north soon expanded even further with their booming industrial economy. Now there are more labor options and more opportunities to exhaust the slaves they already owned. This trend of black laborers became even more beneficial once they began to trade internationally. By not paying their laborers, the white owners profited from both the free labor and goods produced for the oversea markets. In New Jersey, their use of black laborers provided whites with even more economical gains which is why abolition was even further

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When we look at the large picture, a new appreciation is seen in terms of how important slavery was to the emergence of modern capitalism (Beckert,2014). As a demand for cotton textiles increased, so did the demand for high amounts of cotton. This spired the increase trade of slaved from Africa. These slaves were then forced to plant, grow, and pick cotton endlessly to maximize the profits for the rich plantation owner. This lead to the industry becoming more industrialized to further improve profits.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Was Slavery Bad

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The holocaust is a prime example. Notably ,slaves benefited the South’s economy. Slavery was free labor and was used get work done efficiently and productively. Slavery wouldn’t have benefited the North because they had machines,factories, women, and children to do the work and get paid to do the work. Machines were more productive than slaves , so what need did the North have for them?…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though, slaves were thought as subhuman, lesser than the common man these thoughts could have been driven by the economic impact such people had on societies. Robin Osborne, in his novel, challenges the idea of slavery having roots in economic interest, “Slavery was an institution… maintained by prejudice…Athenians did not like the idea of devoting their lives… to labor”. Possibly, these thoughts of racism and inferiority flourished as an issue to the astounding commercial advantages to slavery. Not only Athenians, but other peoples, developed “justifications” for slavery such as certain races are higher than another because “all slaves did” was provide labor and household assistance. Since such people were enslaved, their state in society diminished due to the advantages they provided wealthy citizens with, leaving certain races being seen as less than human.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being rural, most of the Southerners lived in large allotted lands with slaves or being yeomen farmers, which also hurt the rate of industrialization. This means that unlike the North, there capital wasn’t busy and causing trade, and industrialization in a way hurt the Southerners as they aren’t advancing in technology, because they though with all this plantations and cash crops, why would they need to industrialize? This was a major difference between the North and the South, which could have caused the civil war, primarily because how they have to rely on slaves to fuel their massive plantations. There were more wealthy people in the North then the…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Labor was a big part of the New England and the Southern economy and shaped what exports they relied on. The Industrial Revolution led the New England economy to diversify as the colonist dabbled in different trades. The Southern economy also became more diverse, but their economy still relied largely on the labor of slaves and indentured servants. The culture of the colonies was influenced as owning slaves was connected to gentility and as a result of the improvements in the economy a consumer culture became prominent. Labor was in part everything in the colonies as it gave them financial security, but the results of that labor was greater than that and also affected the culture of the…

    • 2249 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cotton King Slavery

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin made it easier to produce cotton faster. This Industrial Revolution benefited the banks in the north and the plantation owners in the south. Cotton became “king” in American and African Americans were the driving forcing behind such an economic boom. Before the invention of the cotton gin, picking and cleaning cotton and was a labor-intensive job. In 1793 when the…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The North had believed otherwise, that slavery was taking more jobs away from the whites and argued that slavery was hurting the economy rather than boosting it. The only people who did not profit off anything was the slaves working the free labor, the black population. The war began due to the struggle of trying to preserve the union, not the struggle of trying to free the slaves. Though the fight to free the slaves benefited black people all around America and derived from morals and ethic, they were not prioritized. Lincoln having a personal dislike of slavery, was willing to tolerate it in some states if it meant preserving the union.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, he wouldn’t have written the positive good speech if no one wanted to terminate slavery. John wanted to convince the people who were against his views to know why slavery improved America and that the race from central Africa had never been in this great condition before slavery came along and that if it they were to make two races equally then America wouldn’t be the same. He wanted to point out that the north and south both benefited from slavery in many ways. The north depended on the south for most of their goods and without them there would be no survival in the north. Not to mention, slavery is what made cash crops and kept the federal government going since it gave them revenue.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moore expresses the vast difference in treatment under General Carter than from his slave owner in Virginia. General Carter was even offended that Archy had a last name as he did not approve of it.2 Virginian and Marylandian slaves were often sought after, so the fact that Moore was traded around is not unusual. Virginian slaves were known to be hard-working and reliable as many of the slaves were born into slavery.3 Archy mentions that his old slave owners were a bit more lenient and rewarding to the slaves. When the slaves needed more to do their jobs or live better lives it would be provided for them, if they deserved it or it was not “outlandish”. Therefore it could be theorized that Virginian slaves worked harder as they knew their hard work meant they would be treated better.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There has been much historical debate over the causes of The American Civil War, with some historians arguing that it was due to the rising abolition movement and others arguing that it was due to economic factors, such as the fundamental differences in the Northern and Southern economies. Many Historians tend to agree that although the war did not begin because of slavery, it influenced the events of the war itself and its outcome, as the cause became one of emancipation. Civil War historiography doesn’t describe the origins of the civil war being purely economic and frequently the view of the Civil War as ‘a crusade against the evil of slavery’ is rejected. Other factors to consider when examining the origins of the Civil War include political…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays