Pseudoscience Vs Knowledge

Improved Essays
As humans we have several capacities that other species in the animal kingdom do not have. Our brain can reason and process information like no other animals can do, in fact we are capable to judge and make our own conclusions. Unfortunately, not every thought that crosses our minds is accurate; this has led to stablish parameters between what is reliable and what is not. Over the past decades, scientists have avoided to spread information that is not proven. They have used the scientific method to analyze and disseminate facts that we can rely on. However, there are more facts spread than science can proof. We have a lot of questions that need to be answered and for science it may take time. That’s where pseudoscience starts threatening science, …show more content…
Research and Analysis takes time and it requires a given documentation. “Though the process of scientific discovery is much more complicated, the basic goal of science is no different from the acquisition of everyday beliefs: we seek knowledge and try to weed out falsehood” (Blancke, Boudry, and M. Pigliucci). On the other hand, pseudoscience can provide answers in the means of no time without requiring any data or experimental analysis, which could take years. Even if the facts aren’t reliable is an approximation of reality. A good example of this is one of the most controversial topics of our civilization; is there extraterrestrial life on other planets? Pseudoscience can answer that question in the matter of no time and without any research, while science have taken years trying to proof that there is life in other planets and have not yet give us and …show more content…
A good example is the theory that the world was going to end in 2012 according to the Maya’s calendar; this rumor affected the behavior and decisions of many individuals who believe that the world was going to end. Many people sold their houses, went on vacation and quit their jobs, because of this skeptic theory. According to scientists like Christopher Keating ,professor of physics at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, this so called doomsday only ended up scaring people and producing panic; in his own words “people who have been misled by those who have manipulated ancient legends… can, and will, make irrational decisions.". Imagine yourself shouting to your boss you won’t receive any more orders and that you are going to quit your job. A month later after new year you find yourself unemployed and penniless because you spend all you had and quit your job, that’s when you start asking yourself why the world didn’t end? The good news is that you still alive, the bad one is that you shouldn’t have quit your job based in pseudoscience. Now, if a meteorite is in the trajectory of the earth and scientists prognosticated that it will crash our planet in one month, start packing up and planning that trip that you never made because science is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Keith E. Stanovich, the author of “How to Think Straight About Psychology,” explains different aspects of psychology to his readers in the first chapter of his book. He starts off by stating how Sigmund Freud is a fraud when it comes to psychology. Although Freud’s work in psychology is so little, he is the reason why many people misunderstand psychology. Then the chapter begins to talk about how psychology is composed of different topics and studies, and when there are many different topics it is difficult to link all of the topics into one. When psychology is often discussed, many people do not consider it a science.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Mistrust of Science” by Atul Gawande is a commencement address at the California Institute of Technology. Atul Gawande calls upon the institutes graduates to take a stance and defend the common misconceptions and myths about scientific issues concerning today’s society. The commencement’s main goal was to use a logical thought process to defend the scientific evidence against common misconception. For example, Atul Gawande says “They deploy false analogies and other logical fallacies… when scientists produce one level of certainty; the pseudoscientists insist they achieve another.” Atul claims that pseudoscientists deploy a poor sense of logical reasoning to mislead the public, which cannot be backed up by hard scientific evidence.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Skorton, in the article “Why Scientists Should Embrace Liberal Arts”, argues that scientists must supplement their science and engineering education with a study of the humanities to effectively inform the populous. Through the humanities, Skorton believes scientists can develop a better understanding of the human conditions, thus better emotionally connecting with people lacking a scientific background. Skorton’s article contributes a perspective towards solving a larger problem of the drift between the scientific community and the general public’s perception of scientific truth, particularly the scientific truths that inform politically charged debates. Skorton effectively aggrandizes the scientific community as potential saviors of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Exploring the Unknown Science is one that is often thought of as a methodical process. Students are taught to follow a set group of rules to achieve a predictable result. But, once these students are actually engaged in the reality of the scientific world, they find out that scientific research is far more complex and adventurous expanding beyond this simple ruleset they are presented with They learn that science embraces the risk of being wrong and pushes its pursuer to explore knowledge that had previously never been explored. Scientists are expected to grasp knowledge that no one had ever before been presented with, making the field of scientific research one filled with risk and unpredictability. In the excerpt from The Great Influenza,…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logos, What the World Needs More of Science is based in logos. Research and experiments are attempts to establish facts, and to draw correct conclusions based on those facts. While all of science is based on this, I am a personal trainer, so I’m most familiar with the health sciences and research. When discussing health, it would seem obvious that it should be a factual process. If I do A, B will happen.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pseudoscience is being used as a cover for the understanding of real…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In recent years, the outcry of people against genetically modified food, or GM food, has become increasingly prominent in both commercial and governmental practices. GM foods have a negative connotation; people think that eating something that has been modified is going to poison their body. Not only that, but most of the American public believes that in doing this, humans are playing god, and have gone too far. However, none of this is true. So far, none of the GM food currently on the market has any ill-effects on humans.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hence it is important that within the domains of “science” we should form our own beliefs upon the evidence and support each case…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the science field alone, Merchants of Doubt describes how the group of scientist use taglines such as no scientific consensus or degree of uncertainty in several cases. The tobacco industry, global warming, and the ozone layer depletion are only a few examples where the science has been attacked to stop government involvement. However, being deceived isn’t the only issue. Scientists have provided overwhelming evidence on global warming alone yet many still consider it a myth. The issue with no following up is global warming is still there.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ghost Hunters

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The other side calls it pseudoscience and claims that scientific data is not being used or at least not correctly and the field will never be taken seriously unless actual scientific procedure is employed to conduct research in to the paranormal.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Voodoo science, because it sticks in an uneducated person unproven fears like pins in a voodoo doll. The main method of voodoo science is to stun person with such an unexpected facts, force to believe instantly without demanding any evidences. 
 As an example, here is the claim that plastic bottles that contaminate water inside at freezing temperature. This claim possibly could pop up inside ads on one of free-download websites.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science gives us opinions, not knowledge. The particular that believes science provides knowledge surely would dispraise this belief solely. Those are who reckon with the idea that “science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though science has overcome many explorations that impact our world and society, it does include some limitations that are regulated. For example , money plays a huge role for budgeting all of the experiments that allow scientist to gather more information that could possibly be used for future inventions or solutions. The expenses going towards NASA’s “Mars 2020 Mission” are regulated by the President, who he has proposed $17.46 billion for the year of 2015. With that said, the incredible amount of money that is being funded by Obama each year for NASA is ,somewhat, a huge part of what the future holds. American innovation rest on the investments we make today.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lauden suggested that the demarcation criterion results in a set of ambiguities surrounding the scientific status of almost all statements, while every improbable statement with certain degrees of falsifibility can win assent from the falsificationism demarcation criterion. Even the flat earth theory can be demarcated as scientific in the light of empirical observations. Critics may argue that the degree of testability is what differentiates science and non-science rather than the absolute ability to be verified. Apart from the fact that there is no such comparison between two claims as scientific statements should not entail any pseudoscientific claim, testability does not entail worthiness of the claim.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Science Vs Pseudoscience

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However science has its limitations when it comes to dealing with ultimate truths, so I rely on…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays