First argument: Video. “Republican chokes up at Gay Marriage Debate in Washington.” Posted by Chris Cunningham on February 9, 2102. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRmw1Su21iw
In the video “Republican chokes up at Gay Marriage Debate in Washington”, Republican State Representative Maureen Walsh, representing the 16th district of Walla Walla, speaks in support of legalizing same-sex marriages in front of her colleagues during a debate in Washington DC. Maureen Walsh supports same-sex marriage equality and claims that it is against human rights to deny the right of marriage to people due to their sexual orientation. The debate on the legalization of same-sex marriage takes place in the House of Representatives in Washington D.C. At the end of the debate, the House vote 55-43 in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage. …show more content…
On one hand, it delivers the impression that the author is a pediatrician who believes that vaccines save lives. On the other hand, it gives the impression that the author is against vaccinations and pharmaceutical companies. If the author‘s purpose was to create a satire/argument similar to the satire created by “the ritual among the nacirema.” he failed to deliver it consistently throughout his article. Structure of the article and style, as well as pathos, logos and ethos guide the audience into confusing and disconnected ideas. The author leaves the reader asking, “Why am I reading this?”
Third argument: Video. “Nick Faldo Calls On Tiger Woods To “Do The Mainly Thing” And Quit.” http://deadspin.com/nick-faldo-calls-on-tiger-woods-to-do-the-manly-thing-472778653
In the video, Nick Faldo—a Golf channel analyst, three time masters champion —claims that Tiger Woods broke the rules of golf and therefore he should be disqualified. The argument is directed to Tiger Woods, an audience of Golfers, golf enthusiasts, and to people who are interested in Tiger
In the video “Republican chokes up at Gay Marriage Debate in Washington”, Republican State Representative Maureen Walsh, representing the 16th district of Walla Walla, speaks in support of legalizing same-sex marriages in front of her colleagues during a debate in Washington DC. Maureen Walsh supports same-sex marriage equality and claims that it is against human rights to deny the right of marriage to people due to their sexual orientation. The debate on the legalization of same-sex marriage takes place in the House of Representatives in Washington D.C. At the end of the debate, the House vote 55-43 in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage. …show more content…
On one hand, it delivers the impression that the author is a pediatrician who believes that vaccines save lives. On the other hand, it gives the impression that the author is against vaccinations and pharmaceutical companies. If the author‘s purpose was to create a satire/argument similar to the satire created by “the ritual among the nacirema.” he failed to deliver it consistently throughout his article. Structure of the article and style, as well as pathos, logos and ethos guide the audience into confusing and disconnected ideas. The author leaves the reader asking, “Why am I reading this?”
Third argument: Video. “Nick Faldo Calls On Tiger Woods To “Do The Mainly Thing” And Quit.” http://deadspin.com/nick-faldo-calls-on-tiger-woods-to-do-the-manly-thing-472778653
In the video, Nick Faldo—a Golf channel analyst, three time masters champion —claims that Tiger Woods broke the rules of golf and therefore he should be disqualified. The argument is directed to Tiger Woods, an audience of Golfers, golf enthusiasts, and to people who are interested in Tiger