Analysis Of The Homer 's ' The Iliad ' Essay

1037 Words Sep 20th, 2016 5 Pages
Poor leadership is devastating in The Iliad. Homer recognizes this, making a particular effort to demonstrate what traits constitute effective leadership. It is crucial, therefore, to determine exactly how Homer presents this idea in order to gain a coherent understanding of his beliefs. With Homer’s convictions in mind, the individual gifts of these war leaders shine rather brightly. One can then begin to analyze them, deciding for oneself who fits Homer’s ideas the best. Assuredly, each of the Iliadic leaders have their particular talents, but they lack a certain well roundedness: What Ajax has in brute strength, he lacks in intelligence. What Achilles has in fighting skill, he lacks in his inability to check his anger. Logically, the best leader would possess all of these positive traits, or at least possess them more than other men. In addition, Homer makes it clear that a good leader must also have a selfless sense of duty. Who, then, is the character who is dutiful and fills multiple roles at once? Hektor. Although Hektor is indispensable to the Trojan army due to the well-rounded leadership Homer defines, what makes him distinctive is his sense of duty to Troy. This characteristic makes him unique among the leaders in the Iliad. In fact, it is precisely this virtue that makes him one of the finest.
Throughout the Iliad, Homer uses very specific adjectives to describe the exceptional traits of Achaean and Trojan leaders. Consider Odysseus as an example: in book ten,…

Related Documents