12 Angry Men Reflection

Improved Essays
The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty? These twelve men of the jury will have to discuss and go over evidence to decide the boy 's fate. When the men sit down in the room it is very obvious that, most of the men do not want to be here. Also majority of the men think the boy is guilty, even without discussing the case. So they all take a vote on what the boys fate will be. Eleven of the jurors say death, but juror number eight votes not guilty. This is because he is not convinced of the boy …show more content…
Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also. So they did a vote, but this vote was different it was a private vote. So the twelve men all casted in their votes. The foramen received the votes and open each on eagerly to see what the vote was. There was one more not-guilty vote. juror three after find this out gives juror five criticism, because he thinks that juror five’s vote was the not-guilty, and that he voted not guilty just because juror five grew up in the slums and felt bad for the boy. The viewers then find out that it was not juror number five who voted not guilty, it was juror number nine who voted guilty. He feels that juror eight’s point deserve to be discussed and gone over before they reach their “realist …show more content…
Juror eight then states that you have a hard time answering questions when in emotional distress. juror eight, then test juror four and ask him questions, like the boy would of had to answer. After the test juror two makes a good point using his great observational skills, He states that the stab wound on the dad was down word, the boy was at least five inches shorter, why would he stab down? Then juror five tells the jurors that when using a switch blade properly, you are not able to stab downward. He knows this from his previous slum life, where he saw knife fights almost

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In both of the trials, the citizens and other members of jury believe that the defendant is guilty based solely on the defendants’ race; however, Atticus and Davis both disagree with the popular opinion and are more than willing to prove and support their own opinion. In 12 Angry Men , Juror 3 loudly proclaims that the boy is guilty and that all ghetto youths are criminals, while Juror 7 wants the jury to reach a decision quickly because he wishes to attend a baseball game that evening. Juror 1 conducts a preliminary ballot and eleven jurors vote for conviction without hesitation. When Davis, or Juror 8, is the only one to disagree and cast the only dissenting vote, Juror 10 gruffly declares that Davis is a weak-willed "bleeding heart". While Juror 2, a shy and stammering bank clerk, appears to be maintaining his guilty verdict because he feels intimidated by the more outspoken jurors, Davis proudly stands his ground refusing to conform to the others’ opinions.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eight is stubborn in refusing to give in to the other mans “guilty” vote, because of his strong view on the situation. By the end of the play, the situation is reversed when Juror No. Three remains the only one who thinks the boy is guilty. In the beginning of “Twelve Angry Men” we learn that Juror No.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group Dynamics Which source of group influence explains why we don’t cut in line, interrupt others, or invade people’s personal space? In what ways does this source of influence differ from the others? When we are out in public we display certain societal norms, it is different for everywhere we go. For example, when going into a bank you know to hold the loudness in your voice to a certain degree while talking to the cashiers. You also know to wait in line for your turn and not cutting people in line.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the American criminal system, those charged with crimes need to be proven guilty 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' Juror #8 was able to put enough doubt into their minds, by discovering contradicting points in the evidence, to prove to them that they could not be certain enough to convict the defendant. In the beginning, they first talk about witnesses.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important fact was the defendant’s ethnicity and low socioeconomic class. Most of the jurors were mostly middle-aged, white males from the middle-class status. These descriptions were different from the defendants, which made it difficult for the jurors to be sympathetic to the defendant. Juror #5, however, had experience living in a slum area, and so he could sympathize a little for the young man, and after several votes, he voted “not guilty” for the defendant. This example exhibits that if the juror are similar, the juror would tend to sympathize with the…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury plays a vital role in a criminal case in that the life of the offendder ulitimately hangs in the balance of those twelve unique individuals hands. It is their duty to remain impartial, independent, uninfluenced by any other person, and only decide the facts of the case. However, we are humans, and each of us perceive the world in different ways, which are influenced by our past and present experiences. Therefore, our judgements are clouded if we are unable to move away from those perceptions when it comes to deciding an individuals guilt or innocence. In the film 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, we can witness in firsthand how jury members could pose a bias due to their unique individual personality and personal experiences, when deciding the guilt or innocence of another human being.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    During their whole dispute, they come up with different ways to settle arguments, including going around the table and giving each person a chance to explain why they voted guilty or innocent and using evidence to prove one's point. Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent. The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays

Related Topics