The Jungle Rhetorical Analysis

1438 Words 6 Pages
Schlosser defines the same criticisms that many Americans share about the fast food industry, while also agreeing that the food tastes good. He sympathizes with consumers, which places him as a member of the audience himself, then succumbs to the expectations and belief of his readers in order to establish his decorum. He begins the chapter by describing in vivid detail the act of actually purchasing fast food, which nearly every reader can relate to. Establishing that commonplace is the starting point for instituting Schlosser’s ethos, and encourages the audience to read on and absorb his other ideals. Once he finds the commonplace, he progresses to his key points in the story, like the influential power of major corporations
…show more content…
The author of “The Jungle” cites human beings as the cogs, and in Schlosser’s novel the categorization is no different. However, in the meatpacking industry, these human beings are stripped of their civil liberties and glanced upon as nothing but a component of a much greater mechanism. The comparison perfectly depicts the level of treatment a typical employee of the industry would empathize with. The reason behind Schlosser’s line of reasoning for this analogy is to bring awareness to U.S. citizens of the harsh realities millions face every day because of the exploitation of mega corporations. He attaches a symbol in the form or a synecdoche to the identity of the laborer to grasp a further understanding of the issue. This way the audience can use the comparison as a representative of the dehumanization in the labor force. The oppressive forces of the booming businesses pay no mind to an individual’s voice in the fast food industry. These entrepreneurs center themselves in the bigger picture, or the “great machine” known as the profits collected from their handiwork. In reality, it is not the hardworking employee that benefits from these earnings, it is the manipulative businessman behind the grand scheme of …show more content…
These circumstances are some of many that take place in the lives of meat packing assembly workers, so it is key to open people’s minds to what truly is the “World 's Most Dangerous Job”. Schlosser’s purpose for the structure of this chapter is to clearly portray the life of Kenny Dobbins in a way that readers tie in their emotions in the form of a well-told narrative. Storytelling arouses strong sensations in an individual like anger or shock if the speaker captures the experiences strikingly enough. You can observe this sort of method throughout the book where the author prolongs the arrival of persuasion in the form of pathos on a few different occasions. In the chapter “What’s in the Meat”, Schlosser specifies the level of foodborne illness in the United States as a result of carelessness within slaughterhouses and the meatpacking industry. He concludes the chapter by recounting experiences from teenage fast food workers of the general level of safety in their environments. The events they detail are repulsive, like one worker’s story of the time mice defecated on hamburger rolls and were served anyway. Having this at the closing stages of a chapter can let emotion build gradually before being brought to a

Related Documents