An Analysis Of The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
When turning on the television, radio, or just viewing the newspaper, you are flooded with news of murders, homicides, serial killers, and other tragedies. It is an uncommon occurrence to make it through a day in this world and not hear of these tragedies. So what can be done about these crimes? Today, there is an ongoing debate over capital punishment, questioning whether it is morally right or wrong. We, as human beings, have an undeniable privilege on our own lives, but do the lives of others belong to us as well? Do we, as members of society have the right to decide if someone lives or dies? Throughout this analysis, four readings on the topic of the death penalty will be explored in order to conclude which case argues its position most compellingly. Firstly, this analysis will distinguish the rationales in favor of …show more content…
Conversely, more persuasive arguments have been developed for its abolition, including the argument that it is a violation of human rights. The law council states that no individual should be subjected to the death penalty regardless of their nationality, the nature of the crime they alleged to have committed or the time and place of its alleged commission. Capital punishment has been abolished in most western societies due to the rising concern of many people as they say many problems including; innocence of the perpetrator, the costs of execution for governments and the needs of rehabilitation of society. The death penalty is irreversible, absolute judgment may lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. It doesn’t deter criminals; there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. It makes a public spectacle of an individual’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In What Do Murderers Deserve? David Gelernter explores the idea of the death penalty, and its acceptable uses. He does this by providing complex ideas, analogies, and examples, allowing his numerous evidence to actually prove his point. His writing style is eloquent and slightly inflammatory, as he tries to inspire support to an issue that is often pushed to the periphery of other discussions.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been a topic of contention since it was introduced among humankind. The two sides of this issue are either for or against it. There are many solid points between the two disagreeing parties that need to be explored to make an informed decision on which side you would choose to support. Two essays I will draw from in this writing are written by Edward Koch, who is for, and David Bruck, who is against it. Both parties have made excellent points in their writings and will be great avenues to explore while making your decision.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Igor Primoratz Analysis

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The author is in agreement with death penalty and his defense of death penalty considers, "a life for a life". The author defends capital punishment against several objections, as follows: a right to life objection, a contradiction objection, lack of proportionality, an unpreventable error objection, and a bias and prejudice…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Death Penalty: Inhumane or Necessary Deterrent?” written by Euan McKirdy, several concepts surrounding the death penalty are discussed. McKirdy is a Digital News Producer who joined CNN in early 2014 and covers everything from politics, tech and the environment to sport and the arts. Before McKirdy started writing for CNN he wrote for a different publications and websites including Time, the BBC, the Wall Street Journal and Monocle. Throughout the article, McKirdy displays information for both sides of the controversial argument. He writes: Advocates say it is a powerful deterrent against serious crime, while others point to the problems -- and cost -- of keeping violent offenders in general prison populations.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, there are many distinct reasons why the death penalty should not be reintroduced as it doesn’t reduce crime rates, It violates the bill of human rights and it can mistakenly punish innocent…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics