Despite the fact this attitude can be seen in biblical text, I believe the church does not take the position of condoning violence and rape against women and various other non-affluent communities. That said, I believe the church’s response towards violence and victims of violence must center on reclamation and trust. Cooper-White makes a strong argument for the church’s approach when dealing with victims of violence. A passive approach is perhaps Cooper-White’s strongest proposal for the church. Suggesting that the church listen to victims and refrain from over utilizing scripture as a means to recovery is an initiative that will enable the church to gain trust. Moreover, she further suggests that the church refrain from asking the victims to forgive their aggressor. Although it is within doctrine to forgive, Cooper-White suggests that the church gradually invite the idea of forgiving their aggressor. This approach allows the victim to focus on their healing and recovery. Considering the trauma and stress endured by the victim, it is also advantageous for the church to be fluent in grief …show more content…
Given the possibility of broad interpretations along with overzealous views of scripture, it is no wonder that the church faces tremendous scrutiny when approached with controversial issues. In this time of moral bankruptcy and loose agendas I find the need for firm positions on moral issues. It is incumbent upon society to realize the difference between right and wrong. Although our current culture may preach tolerance, it is within this restrain that we also loose grasp of fundamental beliefs. In reflecting on Tamar, the cultural belief and fundamental set of the time viewed women as property. Social tolerance accepted this view and moral standing for women's rights were not existent. At some point morality must ground the foundation of tolerance and not tolerance the foundation for