Comparing The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels

Improved Essays
In The communist manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels there is a focus on the situation of many individuals who have prestigious jobs such as physicians, lawyers, priests, poets, and the man of science. These individuals who have prestigious jobs in today are society, were not being treated with the respect and right actions towards them. Marx explained that there were paid as normal worker with wage similar to the people who weren’t from the same social status as these professionals. I do agree with the following statement: "The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid …show more content…
In the theory of Communism, the bourgeoisie doesn’t allow the prestigious people to succeed in their field. It is a reality that communism can’t actually work fairly because there are many factor that prevent that. These factors are the struggle between the working class and the Bourgeoisie, these struggles doesn’t allow communism to work because the high class always get the benefit of the people who actually work. The working class always has to go to the struggle of getting more benefit from the work they done from the owners of factories. The struggle is that factory owners doest want to pay a fair salary because if they do that they wouldn’t have gain as much profit as the actually do. The bourgeoisie are only willing to help themselves to acquire more profit and leaving the working class in the same struggle without any way to get out of struggling lifestyle. That’s one reason I agree with Marx and Engels statement about the bourgeoisie and the working …show more content…
It’s clear that I do support the statement from Marx and Engels because the Bourgeoisie always wanted more profit for themselves and a lower wage for the working class. That action is what produces a class struggle because one side is benefiting from the weakness of the other. People who have a prestigious profession were working like a factory worker. In the means of lower wage because the bourgeoisie didn’t help to create a system that classified people by the way they earned their living such as capitalism. The statement in the communist manifesto is agreeable and it could be able to explain because the class struggle that communism produces it’s a sad reality for the working

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in the mid 1700’s the Industrial Revolution brought about major changes technologically, and economically in England. When the 1800’s came the Industrial Revolution was in full swing bringing great prosperity both monetarily, and technologically, but at a great price. The great price came at the expense of the factory workers. The treatment both dehumanized the workers and led to a major decline in health, and family dynamic. Despite this terrible treatment of the workers some capitalists believed that the ends justified the means.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx and Engle’s led me to believe that the Proletariat’s do the work while the Bourgeoisie regulate their income and working environments. Bourgeoisie live in wealth and strive to live in a “classless society”. A classless society according to the Bourgeoisie was one with government controlled wages, benefits, and no private ownership. The relationship they share is a give and take type relationship. The proletariat’s gave while the Bourgeoisie’s took.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Just like in Marxist theory there had to be the ruling class that was on top of the food chain, “the better ones” or the Elite. Marx believed that division of labor-class struggle and all other social institutions maintained the status quo. For example “Most of us are aware that certain material realities help determine the quality of our lives and the opportunities available to us”. (Hall 76) In this case money is usually always the factor that limits opportunity for many.”…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Marx responds, “the Bourgeoisie already does this [destroys individuality] for everyone but themselves; the working people of the world must unite” (Mullan, CAL-105-I, 12/07/2016). Marx believes that high class rips free thought away from those who are not rich enough, and to an extend this is true; it is safe to say both systems have their faults and benefits as present times dictates both economies…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friedrich Engels was an upper middle class German in Manchester, England. He wasn’t like majority of the factory owners that he was working with. He was more like a genuinely concern for his working classes he was in. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote the Manifesto of the Communist Party. They were both in the middle class.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These bourgeoisie trust that the best society is the general public in which they have power; they need the working class to keep its feeble part, however to quit despising the prevailing bourgeoisie. A second type of this sort of Socialism perceives the way that lone changes in financial relations could help the low class. Nonetheless, the upholders of this sort of communism don 't acknowledge that such changes essentially involve an obliteration of the relations of creation. Or maybe, they wish to make managerial changes, which basically diminish the expense and measure of regulatory work for the common…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believes that as long as man works according to his ability, he should earn the same as those who are more able than he is. I do not agree with Marx’s beliefs that when man works according to his ability he will earn as much as those who are more skilled than him. Just because a person may work the same amount as their fellow co-workers does not mean that worker produces the same results as his peers. When Marx thinks that “a worker should not only earn the same as her colleagues, if she works according to her ability, but also earn according to her needs” (Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. “The Communist Manifesto”.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Marx, capitalists exploit workers for their labor without sharing any labors equally. Hence, the exploitation occurs; it is what allows the owning classes to dominate and impose their ideology politically on the workers around the world (Garner and Hancock 2014). Furthermore, with Friedrich Engels, Marx claims that “A capitalist society is a society of class inequality, like most societies that preceded it in history” (2014:39). Indeed, the class of capitalists, which is also known as bourgeoisie, particularly enrages Marx. It is said that members of the bourgeoisie “own the means of production” and “exploit the class of laborers” which is called the proletariat; of course, they do not own the means of production as reported in Garner and Hancock…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays