Analysis Of The California Court System

Improved Essays
The California court system is the largest in the nation, serving over 39 million people every year. These courts review almost 7 million cases every year, ranging from criminal proceedings to wrongful death suits on any given day. There is only little over 1,700 judges serving nearly twelve percent of the nation’s population; more than most states combined. That is over 4,000 cases per judge every year. Yet, the California judicial branch only represents less than two percent of the state budget. California’s court system, much like California itself, is fascinating in the way that it does so much with so little. In other states, it may be feasible to sustain a court system with only two percent, but not a court that is dealing with the daily

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment Two: State Court Survey In Arizona, the majority of cities and towns have a municipal court which is sometimes also called city or magistrate court. This court hears misdemeanor and petty offense violations within their town or city. City or town magistrates preside over some criminal and civil traffic cases. Criminal traffic cases with no serious injuries and civil traffic cases that involve violations of city ordinances. They have the ability to issue Orders of Protection and search warrants.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. Arizona 's plural executives have a clear line of succession. The plural executives of Arizona are, listed in order of succession, the Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction (RioLearn. (n.d.). Structure, Term, and Qualifications.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The University of California Medical School adopted a quota system to diversify its students. They set aside 16 slots out of 100 for minority applicants. They did this in order to have other minorities in the medical community. Allan Bakke was one to disagree with that way of thinking through this process. Allan Bakke was an applicant of Caucasian descent, whom was denied twice by University of California’s medical school.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The most important structural change to the Texas judicial system would be to eliminate the current judicial voting system, remove campaign financing and implement an appointed system based on merit. By implementing an appointee system it could help the correct the system by removing campaigning and money as a factor in selecting Judges. Both of these factors, especially money have a huge influence on who is elected. Money is king, whoever has the most money usually has the best chance of becoming elected.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Vs Dynamic Court

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Some cases in the Supreme Court’s history stand out more than others. The case of Microsoft v. AT&T is an example of such a case. This case, which resulted in a major and influential ruling on the inclusion of software coding in patent laws, is an example of a dynamic ruling. This claim will be further explored, but first it is necessary to build an understanding of the meaning of both the dynamic and constrained perspectives. 1.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Superior Court handles civil and criminal cases. The Superior Court handles all felony trials and has jurisdiction over divorces. There are forty nine Superior Circuits with two hundred and nine Judges. The Court of Appeals has twelve Judges and four divisions. The Court of Appeals was set in place to review and correct civil and criminal cases for any errors of law that were made when in trail.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Miller vs California, Miller is charged because he began sending obscene material to a restaurant owner in which they were sensitive to the specific material that they received. To determine what obscene material really is, took two court cases to give a meaning what people or a community perceived some material as obscene. The biggest argument about portrayed obscene material is, what is covered by the First Amendment. The first amendment protects our right of free speech and representation of expression. Some people may view expression of sexually obscene material as right given to them by that First Amendment.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Lockup The Great Lockup highlights the discrepancies in the criminal justice system that is subject to study in the modern American justice system. It was evident that there was racial discrimination in the investigative process and the eventual incarceration of the people arrested. The statistics indicate that 2 percent of the whites were locked in prison while over 9 percent of Black Americans were locked up. The disparity in the racial composition of the people incarcerated based on race shows that the policy of discrimination in the police force existed and some reform needed to be carried out for correct mechanisms to be initiated for a better future to be realized.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    District court judges must maintain a good standing and handle the court they are over and the employees under them. They can be impeached and removed from their position by Congress. Nationwide there is over 670 district court judges. Circuit court is the first…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    South Carolina’s judicial branch of government is notably distinctive when compared to other state’s judicial institutions. South Carolina’s judicial system has drastically evolved over the past fifty years. The state has made great progress in modernizing the structure of its judicial system and its operating procedures in spite of the state’s reputation of being hesitant to change. I believe that South Carolina’s judicial system is one of the better systems in the country because of the progress the state has made restructuring the system and developing a more professionalized and independent judiciary. South Carolina’s unified judicial system consists of six courts: the Court of Appeals, Circuit Courts, Family Courts, Probate Courts, Magistrate…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays