The Struggle In Rabkin's Henry V

Improved Essays
Rabkin starts his second chapter by summarizing that Shakespeare’s art includes a world whose principles are never in doubt, but it is never as simple as one expects. Henry V is another one of Shakespeare’s controversial plays. There have been many different ways of looking at the controversy, but Rabkin argues that they are all wrong. Rabkin states that “Shakespeare created a work whose ultimate power is precisely the fact that it points in two opposite directions” and ultimately, Shakespeare is pushing us to choose one of the two sides of interpretation (34). Rabkin compares this idea to the known illusion of the picture that, on one side, shows a duck, and when turned 90 degrees, shows a rabbit. Rabkin believes that we can look at both views …show more content…
The ambiguities found cannot be defined as what Shakespeare’s plays are “about”; they are merely tools that the poet uses. In Henry V, Shakespeare leads his audience to a state of crisis. This altercation between the two possible interpretations of Henry V suggests a “spiritual struggle in Shakespeare that he would spend the rest of his career working through” (Rabkin 62). This struggle in interpretations is found in the problem plays and tragedies. Shakespeare shares this conflict, and he ultimately brings us down into it as we reflect on the plays and performances that lean one way or the other. Rabkin states that Henry V is important because it “shows us something about ourselves: the simultaneity of our deepest hopes and fears about the world of political action” (Rabkin 62). Shakespeare conveys the private selves that we are born in, and the public selves that we must become. Henry V battles with the hope that our problems can be solved by society, and the realization that society has never done so. Within this play, Henry V, ambiguity is the heart of the matter; it is the most important element we must confront in becoming fully aware of the world we live

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream is a play packed with mischief and mayhem. It is often referred to by modern-day scholars as the Elizabethan Inception, as there are multiple examples of “play within a play” devices, each embodying several themes and concepts. Among these are examples of the contrast of tragedy and comedy, the dynamics of the written and spoken word, and imagination vs. reality.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Elizabethan era was a time of great change. This resulted in an environment of speculation and uncertainty. It is during this time that Hamlet, Shakespeare‘s most famous play was being performed. This essay will argue that the ambiguity of the Shakespeare’s Hamlet was designed, at least in part as a reflection of the uncertainty of the Elizabethan world, for as Bloom stated “the text was not created in a vacuum”(7). This essay will begin with a brief explanation of how plays can be used as a tool for social and political commentary.…

    • 2238 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most movies and books in this day and age have simple plots with miniscule character development, but this is not the case in Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare uses foils that the viewer has to dig into in order to see what he is trying to convey, which increases the understanding of the play. The foils are created between three similar characters––Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet––that emphasize where they deviate from each other on specific traits. Even if one reads into all of the details they will still be thrown by the eventual, unpredictable, ending of the play. Shakespeare creates a new way to view masculinity by using both classical and modern interpretations of important character traits, defined by these foils, to show why Fortinbras is the only one left standing by the end of the play.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hamlet, the first in Shakespeare's arrangement of awesome tragedies, was at first delegated an issue play when the term got to be trendy in the nineteenth century. Like Shakespeare's other issue plays - Hamlet concentrates on the inconveniences emerging from adoration, passing, and treachery, without offering the crowd a definitive and positive determination to these entanglements. This is expected to some degree to the straightforward reality that for Hamlet, there can be no complete solutions forever's most overwhelming inquiries. In fact, Hamlet's world is one of perpetual…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accordingly, in examining the desire for freewill in both contexts, the audience are invited to witness the important of loyalty to both protagonists. As reflected in Richard III, Shakespeare disproves Richard’s…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare writes this play and positively showcases pros and cons of deceit. In conclusion this play is about the relationship torn and brought together by tricks and…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an attempt to veil political motivations can be seen in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) interpretation of Act 2, Scene 4, directed by Gregory Doran. Doran’s representation of this scene serves to present a dramatic, visual performance, but also to demonstrate his shared perspective of Shakespeare’s political views. The characterisation of Falstaff as a static character is a foil to King Henry, where the juxtaposition is apparent between the honourable and utilitarian yet politically ambiguous figures, versus the vulgar yet honest ‘human’. Moreover, Falstaff satirises King Henry IV’s legitimacy and how he presents himself, as he says, “Give me a cup of sack to make my eyes look red, that it may be thought I have wept, for I must speak in passion...”, the motif of ‘sack’ being associated with irresponsibility and frivolity as a result of Falstaff’s characterisation. Furthermore, Falstaff continues the meta-play, satirising the King’s way of speech through his role-playing: “I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also”.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare highlights enduring ideas about the human condition through the use of dramatic techniques in his tragedy plays. In his play Macbeth, Shakespeare effectively uses the dramatic techniques of character development, commentary by others and symbolism to reveal the enduring ideas of power, greed and ambition, along with its corruptive appeal; relationships and betrayal; and the common issues of loyalty leading to deception. These ideas are shown in exploring the tragic downfall of Macbeth. The enduring idea of corruptive ambition, including power and greed, is explored by the use of dramatic techniques of characterisation, symbolism and commentary by others.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Falstaff's Honor

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The battlefield is not a venue for honor, but a playground; the highway is not for traveling, but for thieving; the throne is not for a king, but for a drunk. Thus, the movement of I Henry IV is not Hal’s rise to royalty, but his tragic loss of the most essential human quality, passion for life; in Falstaff, Shakespeare’s play finds not simply comic relief but an antidote to the power and corruption that threaten the fragile conception of what it is to be a living…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Hamlet exclaims that “The play’s the thing/ Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King,” Shakespeare suggests that life is like a play, full of actors, and expects the audience to identify their morals by watching the scene unfold (2.2.633-34). Throughout the tragedy, characters like Claudius, Hamlet and Ophelia are forced to hide their true intentions and establish a new persona for themselves, whether as a worthy King, a mad Prince or a secure woman. Although the new identities help them keep the throne, carry out their revenge or seek protection, these conflicting behaviors eventually lead the characters in Hamlet to their untimely death. As man who kills his own brother, the King, Claudius is not simply a murderer, but also a traitor.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s Ideas of Identity William Shakespeare questions identity throughout his works, but this theme is especially apparent in Henry IV, Part 1. Typically, Shakespeare will have characters question themselves and their importance to show identity; however, he expands on this in several ways in this play. This struggle relates to the society that Shakespeare was accustomed to, yet this struggle is still faced today. Identity is something that people still struggle with because of the numerous ways it can be defined. One’s identity can be linked to their appearance, name, personality, occupation, race, or political views.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    William Shakespeare is arguably the greatest playwright of the seventeenth century. His talents continue to shine through his sonnets, comedies, and tragedies. From 1601 to 1609, Shakespeare crafted his four great tragedies: King Lear, Othello, Macbeth, and Hamlet. All four of these plays contain a tragic hero, who either dies or experiences a dramatic downfall because of his tragic flaw. Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his inability to act to avenge his father's death; however, corruption in Denmark is also a prevalent issue throughout the play.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ultimately, life’s uncertainty was also seen through characters in the story. Mercutio and Friar Laurence provided an insight into the upcoming uncertainty of the story and the details that would once later become relevant in the play to show the greater significance. Shakespeare’s masterful job of incorporating life’s ambiguity and nature’s duality provided not only an insight into the lives of other fictional characters, but also helped establish an emotionally accessible connection with his audience. He shares this insightful message in his critically and world renowned play, that is the great tragedy of, Romeo and Juliet. “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.”…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nature of Humans in Macbeth Throughout the play Macbeth, Shakespeare shows multiple aspects of human nature and how he views them. He makes it clear that everyone is capable of being simultaneously good and evil. The temptation of evil can easily persuade anyone. The way that society regards gender roles in relationships is not always the best.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet Problem In Hamlet

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many scholars research Shakespeare’s plays to learn about him, his lifestyle, and the customs of that era. Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare in about 1599, is read and studied by nearly every student. Even though countless scholars have researched it, the play ultimately leaves them puzzled. Each person that has studied Hamlet has come up with a unique opinion and conclusion of the play. Although Graham Bradshaw and William Empson both have different views on the way Hamlet was written and the famous “Hamlet Problem”, William Empson has a more valid argument on the new play.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays