My initial thoughts, after I completed reading My Sister’s Keeper, coexisted as disbelief and misunderstanding. I uncovered it ironic that Kate, the sister that I anticipated to pass away, persisted alive, while Anna, the benefactor, died unexpectedly. In my mind, I assumed the end of the book to entail Kate dying from her Leukemia, with Anna bearing a devastating sense of guilt for aiding her sister in her death. This book taught my to retain an open mind – expect the unexpected. It simply illustrated the true ignorance of the mind; individuals tend to jump to conclusions, yet our judgments often appear misjudged and inappropriate. Although Anna finally acquired what she desired – medical emancipation from her parents – she immediately passed
…show more content…
To further comprehend the motives and interactions between the family members, one can use Bowen’s family systems theory, clarifying triangulation in the book. Triangulation essential means that one individual, within a family or group, serves as a mediator between two individuals who do not communicate. The best example of triangulation in this book subsists a Brian, as he stood as the communicator between Anna and Sara. Knowing that Sara would influence Anna’s decision, Brian permitted Anna to stay at the fire station. Brian not only supported Sara as his parent, with the best intentions to save Kate, but he also recognized that Anna deserved the right to her own body. Brian stood in the middle of Sara and Anna, consenting him to perceive both sides of the story. When Sara asked about Anna, Brian informed her of Anna’s status, and vise versa. While it did not subsist that Sara and Anna did not desire to speak to one another, it remained as the legal mandate. Along with Brian, Anna essentially represented triangulation through serving as a mediator between Kate and her parents. Because Kate did not desire to tell her parents that she no longer retained a desire to live, Anna brought about the court case, speaking on the behalf of Kate’s wishes. Triangulation and family dynamics differ from family to family, demonstrating the values and concerns of the individual family. My Sister’s Keeper opened my eyes to the working of family dynamics and moral codes within a
To further comprehend the motives and interactions between the family members, one can use Bowen’s family systems theory, clarifying triangulation in the book. Triangulation essential means that one individual, within a family or group, serves as a mediator between two individuals who do not communicate. The best example of triangulation in this book subsists a Brian, as he stood as the communicator between Anna and Sara. Knowing that Sara would influence Anna’s decision, Brian permitted Anna to stay at the fire station. Brian not only supported Sara as his parent, with the best intentions to save Kate, but he also recognized that Anna deserved the right to her own body. Brian stood in the middle of Sara and Anna, consenting him to perceive both sides of the story. When Sara asked about Anna, Brian informed her of Anna’s status, and vise versa. While it did not subsist that Sara and Anna did not desire to speak to one another, it remained as the legal mandate. Along with Brian, Anna essentially represented triangulation through serving as a mediator between Kate and her parents. Because Kate did not desire to tell her parents that she no longer retained a desire to live, Anna brought about the court case, speaking on the behalf of Kate’s wishes. Triangulation and family dynamics differ from family to family, demonstrating the values and concerns of the individual family. My Sister’s Keeper opened my eyes to the working of family dynamics and moral codes within a