Living On A Lifeboat Analysis

Improved Essays
Introduction: In the article “Living on a Lifeboat,” Garrett Hardin believes that our obligations to the poor and hungry are metaphors based on the ethics of living on a lifeboat and the tragedy of the common. The ethics of living on lifeboat is based upon the rich and the poor. Rich people are in the lifeboat and poor people are in the sea. The wealthy has only three options in the situation with the poor people. First help all of the poor and everyone sinks. Next, help only who else can fit and eventually sink and have other problems. Lastly, take no one else and continue to be safe. The metaphor, the tragedy of the common means that when everyone shares resources and goods it will also only lead to destruction for everyone. Hardin uses …show more content…
Majority of the people who are rich can afford and will be able to sustain in the land. However, the rest will be poor people. Hardin questions about what should be done if there was fifty people in a boat and ten available spots on the boat. Meanwhile, there are hundred people in the water asking for help. He suggested three possible answers. The first answer is allowing everyone in the water on the boat but at the risk of their safety. The second option is adding only ten more people to the boat and ensuring everyone’s safety. Although, everyone is safe, there would be a problem with the process of selecting ten more people to allow on the boat. For example, should the selection be based on the first to come or perhaps the neediest. Last but not least, the last solution is to not add anyone else on the boat and not sacrifice their safety, besides from others on the boat. Many people may say that the last option is wrong, yet, the same people who boarded the boat or will board the boat no longer will see things like that because they will be getting on the boat as …show more content…
Suppose there was a boat with only ten available spots left, the answer for all three suggestions Hardin suggested is simple. First, allow the extra ten people on board, of course with the most sensible selection of those ten. Then let the others know that you will come back for them, meaning you will try to do your best to think of a solution to help the poor. Next, look for others who would be willing to help get the others out of the water. For example, the wealthy should contribute with shelter, clothing and food for the poor. Helping one another will create a stronger community and create less danger for everyone. People on the boats will be helping to get the rest of the poor people out of the water, therefore the boats will not be impacted and everyone’s safety will not be at risk. Also, the other boarding parties will be less of a threat because everyone will be working with each other for the better good. It is important to help the needy and the overpopulated countries because one day the wealthy country may need help. Then the country or poor people that were once needy can now help in return. Even though it is easier for people to look the other way once they get on the boat because they are now safe and secure, it is important to help the needy. Another reason why everyone should come together and help the poor and unite is because it can very easily be one of the rich people in or one of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics, he emphasizes on the ethical issue of how to judiciously help the poor and the argument behind it. In the beginning of the essay Hardin responds to the comparison of Earth as a spaceship, by stating that it can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists to justify suicidal policies for sharing our resources through uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid. Interestingly enough, he prefers to address the issue with a lifeboat metaphor, in which refers to the rich nations (such as the United States) as being aboard the boat, as well as the poor nations who are swimming around the boats for…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sea Otters Pros And Cons

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Huffington Post’s article authoritatively described the definition of a trophic cascade as an ecological phenomenon triggered by the addition, or removal of top predators and involving reciprocal changes in the relative populations of predator and prey through a food chain, which often results in dramatic changes in ecosystem structure and nutrient cycling (huffingtonpost.com).” For that reason, in today’s society we have witnessed numerous trophic cascades that occur all over the world, specifically sea otters, blue crabs, jaguars, and as we discussed in class wolves that illustrate predators that decimate their prey because of the food chain (quora.com).” First of all, in the example of the sea otters, sea otters eat urchins. Sea urchins are omnivorous animals and therefore eat both plant and animal matter. The sea urchin mainly feeds on algae on the coral and rocks, along with decomposing matter such as dead fish, mussels, sponges, barnacles, and kelp.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Pattenaude Professor Kiefer ENGWR 300 6 September 2016 Summary of "Self-Definitions" William T. Vollmann, in the first section titled “Self-Definitions” of his book Poor People, through a series of interviews, research, and self-examination attempts to define the concept of poverty and what makes people poor. In the introduction of the book, the author states that he is looking for the “similarities and differences in the experiences of being poor" (Vollmann 2). He admits that while other writers have experienced poverty he, himself, has not. Vollmann is found in every chapter asking those he interviews why they believe they are in their situation and whether or not they believe they are poor.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many protestations to Singer’s opinion that; we have moral obligations to contribute for the prevention of poverty. Such efforts to deny our moral obligation to the world’s poor originate from various ethical positions. Two of such objections are as follows: The first objection has consequential logic, however its conclusion is different. It states that by preventing poverty now, it may lead to more suffering in the future, so we should implement a triage policy - providing help according to the urgency of need of care - in order to lessen the usage of resources which inevitably will be need in the future (Campbell et al,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peter Singer Famine

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To Hardin, it is nationhood and the concept of overpopulation that should dictate an individual’s role in helping the poor. He believes those that live far away on other continents, or within other states, should not receive help from those in wealthy nations like the United States. American citizens, according to Hardin, have no obligation to help those that are starving in other countries, even as a result of a failing government. He believes that any foreign aid given to states will only lead to worse outcomes for the rest of the world. If countries provide foreign aid, “poor countries will not learn to mend their ways, and will suffer progressively great emergencies as their population grows.”…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, proximity should not be the deciding factor on who to help. Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case against the Poor,” argues that help to the poor should not be given (Hardin, 1974, pp.566-567). Hardin provides an analogy that supports his argument; there are 50 people on a lifeboat with 10 more empty spots, however if a new plant disease breaks out or the weather decimates the population, there should be excess food provided on the lifeboat (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). If the lifeboat encounters 100 swimmers, there are 3 ways to deal with this issue: (1) by the Christian ideal if everyone is let in then the boat will drown, (2) let ten people in, but who?, the ten neediest or the best ten?, etc. or (3) don’t admit anyone to the boat which ensures survival to those who are already on in the Lifeboat (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Due to scarce resources (as seen…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense of the survivors’ guilt arising from not helping the poor, he claimed that “the net result of conscience-stricken people giving up their unjustly held seats is the elimination of that sort of conscience from the lifeboat”. He defined guilty about one’s good luck as a type of conscience and the newcomer’s lack of guilt about the rich people’s loss as conscience drain; but the author deliberately omitted the morality of rich people’s indifference to the poor asking for help. Counting the negative effects on total conscience in the lifeboat if no rescue is attempted, the final solution to the lifeboat dilemma might be changed. Essentially, the author’s negligence of social injustice against impoverished people and the ethical issue indifference is just a result of his bias for the rich countries.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through examples from lecture and the article, I will review how this is a beneficial article to understand. Hardin goes into detail about how with every country having a different population causes for unequal resources needed. In the article it discusses the options that could be used to help countries where there is overpopulation and hopefully stop the hunger of many people. This is done through the discussion of The World Food Bank and a number of programs for improving agriculture in hungry nations called “Green Revolution”.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lifeboat has a limited capacity size of people that can fit for it to function. In his argument, the lifeboat has some room for more people, but not enough for all the people…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Help a few people, guilt and the constant need to guard against people boarding arises. This problem of who gets help and who doesn’t get help leads to the need of population control. Maybe there are just too many…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: In the final chapter of Come Hell or High Water:Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster Michael Dyson looks at how different groups use religion in the face of a natural disaster. In Hurricane Katrina there were essentially two groups that were a part of the disaster: poor, black victims and those that were supposed to help them. For those that are in a position to help, they often view natural disasters as a means for God to punish sinners and for those that need help they look to God as a comfort and as a way to cope. In the chapter, Dyson discusses how several Christian role models made similar statements about how New Orleans is a hub of sin and that the citizens of New Orleans snarl in the face of God until they need help;…

    • 1072 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The proposal of Y and Z’s survival lottery can be seen as being problematic because it follows the principle of utilitarianism. This essay will show how the survival lottery develops the ideas of a utilitarianism/consequentialist argument and will seek to critique it. Firstly I will look at how the survival lottery and utilitarianism see people as merely a means to an end and how this goes against Kant’s categorical imperative. Secondly, I will explore how the survival lottery looks at killing and letting die morally equivalent and how this goes against the doctrine of acts and omissions. I will finally conclude with looking at how the survival lottery, alike utilitarianism, causes an infringement on autonomy.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics