Taken Hostage Analysis

Improved Essays
The political scene of the 1970’s was set for something drastic to occur on the front of foreign policy. Time and time again, clumsy dealings with foreign policy set America up for mishap. The government created a standard of disappointment and the lack of trust people felt for the government was astonishing. Broken promises became a theme, and ineffective administration became an expectation. Taken Hostage by David Farber plays through the set up of the Iranian-Hostage Crisis and the many governmental failings that lead to it. The reactions of the American public make it apparent that the actions of the United States government, through its many economic, domestic, and foreign policies, majorly lead to the crisis and perhaps even exacerbated …show more content…
In the wake of Watergate and the Vietnam War, Americans felt like there was no one in government they could give their confidence to. The nation was suffered a painful blow to its pride with the unsatisfying involvement in Vietnam and another to its integrity when the most respected position in government, the presidency, blatantly lied to the public with Watergate. “[Americans] were taught that our armies were always invincible and our causes were always just, only to suffer the agony of Vietnam. We respected the Presidency as a place of honor, until the shock of Watergate,” and this undermining of the government shook American’s down to their patriotic core (32). After facing such hardships, it was easy for the citizens to be skeptical of the government’s ability to handle its affairs, especially one as delicate as the Iranian-Hostage Crisis. The blame was easy to place on the government, “for most Americans, the hostages were a simple way of thinking about the state of their nation and the men who were supposed to lead it” (141). Americans felt as though their government had failed them in one of the most fundamental concerns of a nation, protecting its …show more content…
Iranian resentment collected with every political blunder and a multitude of ignored requests for help and ultimately reached its breaking point with the takeover of the embassy. Economic troubles and discomfort in the Middle East kept Americans in an uneasy state throughout the 1970’s and Iranian Hostage Crisis seemed to prove that America was not the super power it purported to be and instead was at the mercy of foreign interests who were working to actively undermine our way of life. The anger of the people of the United States in reaction to the hostage crisis is a direct result of domestic unrest and perceived impotence in the executive

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hostage Rescue Case Study

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hostage Rescue Example: A member of the Las Colinas Vagos gang has captured one of our Officers, and his holding him as hostage at the Rodeo bank. The Las Colinas Vagos member is standing infront of the Rodeo bank with our Officer, the Officer has been tied up and a gun has been placed against his head by the Las Colinas Vagos member. Protocol Attempt to establish how many hostages have been taken before arrival.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Steatism Vs Neoliberalism

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For example, revert to the reaction of the United States government during the financial shock in 2008. The financial shock of 2008, the greatest challenge faced by the United States since the Great depression, was a huge upset that affected millions of families around the world. Caused by the unsustainable housing boom matched with easy availability of mortgages along with the high risks financial institutions were taking, the nation’s financial system fell apart. At its apex in September of 2008, the Bush administration was forced to step in and attempt to bring this economic crisis to an end. In order to stabilize the economy, the Bush Administration passed a law creating the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Nixon made many achievements during his term, “his involvement in Watergate tarnished his legacy and deepened American cynicism about government” (History,…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such governments violate all civil liberties to perpetuate their power. While the two novels vary in the specific treatment of their victimized populations, the author’s share a common warning about the potential inhumanity of…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taken Hostage Analysis

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In David Farber’s, Taken Hostage: The Iran Hostage Crisis and America’s First Encounter with Radical…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The points of origin came nearly a century before the Hostage Crisis. The United States and the Iranians had tension due to the oil and how British and American corporations had control over “their oil”. With this occurring by the time the Crisis occurred they had banned Shah and his government from Iran forcing him to flee to Egypt. On November 4 1979 a group of students from Iran took more than 60 American people hostage. This was because Jimmy Carter our president at the time let Shah come get treatment for his cancer in the United States.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All people had during times like the Great Depression, was hope that the government could come through and help. People had this perspective of the government for a while: through both World Wars and even into the Cold War. However, that all came to an end during the Watergate Scandal. The figurehead and controller of a nation being involved in a political crime, and lying the entire time about his involvement. If you can't trust the leader of the government, how can you trust the rest of it?…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Richard Nixon Dbq

    • 3409 Words
    • 14 Pages

    On top of this, his Watergate scandal tainted the Americans’ view of the federal government. Nixon’s mendacious actions befouled the principled, righteous foundation on which the government previously lay. The Watergate scandal instilled in Americans a sense of mistrust and incredulity toward the American government that still, to a certain extent, persists today (Ambrose…

    • 3409 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over the course of the last 40 years, the United States has been tangled in the political environments of both the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Iraq. This entanglement is rooted in the contradictory involvement of the United States in the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980’s. In the war, the United States supported both sides of a conflict in which it officially wished to end, but the resources it provided may have actually allowed the war to continue. One should ask, “Why would the United States pursue contradictory policies in a war it claimed to want to end?” The contradictory policies are grounded in the fact that the United States aimed to effectively prevent a victory from either country, ensuring the security of its interests…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The America known today and known in the past has manipulated what we believe it to be from what it actually is. Despite what Americans think about them being free, and having a unpersuaded say in what goes on the country, they are actually quite controlled and manipulated into helping a dominant elite, when it does not benefit them and really harms them instead. In the essay “From Ingsoc and Newspeak to Amcap, Amerigood, and Marketspeak, “ by Edward Herman the reader is shown the truth behind the Western governments manipulation by comparing it to the government of Ingsoc portrayed in Orwell's novel 1984. In the book 1984 it centers on a frightening dystopian society, where the government has full control over everything, even people's minds…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1979 Iranian Revolution formed an isolated, fundamentalist state and supported terrorism in the nation. The Safavids and Qajars were the two most important dynasties in Iran. The Safavids dynasty made Shia Islam the official religion and Qajar dynasty gave Muslim the political power. In 1906, the Qajars accepted a constitution, developed a parliament that protected minority rights, but the Shah disapproved. The Shah was the current ruler of Iran under the Pahlavi Dynasty.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mohammed Mossadegh

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The changes of the world are evident when reviewing Mohammed Mossadegh’s “Person of the Year” article from 1951. Mohammed Mossadegh was born in May of 1882. He grew up in the midst of major Iranian movements such as the 1891 Tobacco Revolt. He studied in France and Switzerland, then later eventually became prime minister of Iran. Mossadegh was selected as Time's magazine’s 1951 “Person of the Year” due to his nationalization of the Iranian oil.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Iran Hostage Crisis about 60 people were held hostage from November 4th, 1979 to January 21st, 1981, so that's a total of 444 days the people were held against their will. That's one reason why I want to be there during the Iran Hostage Crisis, and the reason being is because I want to see what all the people had to go through, and how they were treated like while there. To be honest I would want to experience what they had to go through, because maybe then I wouldn't take life for granite like I do now. Although the only reason why the Muslim students took hostages was that their leader snuck into the U.S. for treatment for his cancer, but the Muslim students thought we, the U.S., was kidnapping him which is why they took the people…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Iran

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While imperfect in nature, the work of Fitzpatrick suggests that the JCPOA was nevertheless a good deal in that it brought about two critical outcomes. In the first instance, Fitzpatrick suggests that merely succeeding in terms of bringing about a context in which Iran engaged with the West was absolutely critical as it demonstrated to the world that Iran was a rational actor which could be negotiated with in good faith. In the second instance, Fitzpatrick suggests that the agreement was also critically important in that it succeeded in achieving the West’s principal goal – forcing Iran to make a public commitment relating to halting its efforts towards obtaining an independent nuclear capability. Thus, because the agreement brought Iran into…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This led to television being one of the main sources of information which in turn caused the degrade in actual research. Postman had conducted a survey to test the knowledge on the Iranian Hostage Crisis. This particular crisis was shown on television for more than a year. The result of this test showed that American’s knew of the event but no further details containing simple knowledge such as; where Iran was or what language Iranians spoke. Those that did have some basic knowledge learned from the newspaper.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays