Main Idea: Foster claims in this chapter that blindness is never just a fact—it always has symbolic significance in a story. He furthers his claim by saying that most texts feature metaphorical representations of blindness and sight, even if the story doesn’t contain literal blindness. Two important things are that blindness can mean much more than just the physical act of seeing, and that usually a characteristic such as blindness, is important when introduced early in a story.
Literary Example: Slaughterhouse Five
Analysis: True sight is an important concept that is difficult to define for Slaughterhouse-Five. As an optometrist in Ilium, Billy has the professional duty of correcting the vision of his patients. If we extend the idea of seeing beyond the literal scope of Billy’s profession, we can see that Vonnegut sets Billy up with several different lenses with which to correct the world’s nearsightedness. One of the ways Billy can contribute to this true sight is through his knowledge of the fourth dimension, which he gains from the aliens at Tralfamadore. One can also argue, however, that Billy lacks sight completely. He goes to war, witnesses horrific events, and becomes mentally unstable as a result. He has a shaky grip on reality and at random moments experiences overpowering flashbacks to other parts of his life. His sense that aliens have captured him and kept him in a zoo before sending …show more content…
Main Idea: As we’ve seen plenty of times already, nothing should be solely taken on face value. Foster—for the millionth time—points out that heart disease in literature is not just heart disease, but rather a “perfect metaphorical illness.” Writers have always made connections to the heart and this heart disease symbolizes emotions and all kinds of suffering such as: loneliness, cruelty, cowardice, etc. Furthermore, heart trouble doesn’t always need to be in the form of a