Conversation
These days, there are many factors in causing a big division between conversation. Such as author Sherry Turkle, wrote “Stop googling, Let’s Talk.” published in 2015 in the New York Times, and argues that while technology has help with connecting humans across the world together it’s also has cause human to lose interaction in a conversation without looking at a phone or electronic device. “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk” inform the readers of technology declining conversation by appealing to people through ethos, logos and pathos. In doing so, Turkle is clearly illustrate ways in which rhetoric addresses contingent issues because technology declining conversation is a controversial from of commutation. “Stop Googling, Let’s Talk” uses …show more content…
Her middle is full of emotionally-charged words and expression that creates a sympathetic depiction. Turkle display the conversation she had with a 15-old boy and “someday he wanted to raise a family, not the way his parents are raising him (with phones out during meals and in the park…)” This image she evokes of the dispute and vulnerabilities of conversation and technology. As well as the high emotions of a young boy thoughts and feeling on his family conversation and communication to technology. Turkle goal is to make the reader feel sympathy and guilt for the young boy. Adding on to the idea are the words and phrases used, “Wanted”, “Not”, “stop Googling”, “No phone”, “Plentiful family conversation”, All of these words spark guilt emotions about technology and conversation, which makes the readers sympathize with the young boy who feel “disappointed” and “replaces” very guilt feelings. These words help establish the negatively of technology and conversation that exist when humans are only concern and focus on the devices (technology), which are appeal to pathos, the readers feeling of guilt and sadness with lack of
These days, there are many factors in causing a big division between conversation. Such as author Sherry Turkle, wrote “Stop googling, Let’s Talk.” published in 2015 in the New York Times, and argues that while technology has help with connecting humans across the world together it’s also has cause human to lose interaction in a conversation without looking at a phone or electronic device. “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk” inform the readers of technology declining conversation by appealing to people through ethos, logos and pathos. In doing so, Turkle is clearly illustrate ways in which rhetoric addresses contingent issues because technology declining conversation is a controversial from of commutation. “Stop Googling, Let’s Talk” uses …show more content…
Her middle is full of emotionally-charged words and expression that creates a sympathetic depiction. Turkle display the conversation she had with a 15-old boy and “someday he wanted to raise a family, not the way his parents are raising him (with phones out during meals and in the park…)” This image she evokes of the dispute and vulnerabilities of conversation and technology. As well as the high emotions of a young boy thoughts and feeling on his family conversation and communication to technology. Turkle goal is to make the reader feel sympathy and guilt for the young boy. Adding on to the idea are the words and phrases used, “Wanted”, “Not”, “stop Googling”, “No phone”, “Plentiful family conversation”, All of these words spark guilt emotions about technology and conversation, which makes the readers sympathize with the young boy who feel “disappointed” and “replaces” very guilt feelings. These words help establish the negatively of technology and conversation that exist when humans are only concern and focus on the devices (technology), which are appeal to pathos, the readers feeling of guilt and sadness with lack of