Mary Roach's nonfiction book, Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers, humorously outlines the ways the human cadaver has served the living since the ancient Egyptians. The acceptance of death is difficult to accept, but Roach's book Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers manages to subjectively objectify the horrid experience of dying. Despite being nonfiction, Roach writes in a very opinionated tone that lightens the subject and makes her book a compelling and easy read as it describes the many fates that human dead bodies can have. In the introduction of Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers, Mary Roach establishes that cadavers are capable of doing fantastic and awesome feats without any negative effect being able to make
…show more content…
Then she builds up to her point that while people avoid using whole cadavers when parts or alternatives are just as good as the real thing, that scientists have had the privilege to face down the onerous tasks of understanding the human body’s limits. Meeting up with injury analyst Shanahan, Roach seeks to understand the reality of the nightmarish incidents like Flight 800. Through an overview of the accident, Roach delineates the reason that more precautions aren’t taken in planes is because of the cost of human life to projected income lost is weighed in with the cost of safety being too …show more content…
She also includes her own example of shooting a gelatin block to lead into her explanation of human cadavers to be variable in characteristics. She then focuses on military funded projects that have issues over lawsuits limiting the ease of researching the highest causes of human death to enable readers to understand that research with cadavers is done for others, unlike the crucifixion experiments. Dr. Pierre Barbet was a surgeon that led the crucifixion experiments to prove the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin and believed that science should be employed for more than just “alleviat[ing] the pains of our brothers” that Roach contradicts to expound that helping others is the number one function of
Then she builds up to her point that while people avoid using whole cadavers when parts or alternatives are just as good as the real thing, that scientists have had the privilege to face down the onerous tasks of understanding the human body’s limits. Meeting up with injury analyst Shanahan, Roach seeks to understand the reality of the nightmarish incidents like Flight 800. Through an overview of the accident, Roach delineates the reason that more precautions aren’t taken in planes is because of the cost of human life to projected income lost is weighed in with the cost of safety being too …show more content…
She also includes her own example of shooting a gelatin block to lead into her explanation of human cadavers to be variable in characteristics. She then focuses on military funded projects that have issues over lawsuits limiting the ease of researching the highest causes of human death to enable readers to understand that research with cadavers is done for others, unlike the crucifixion experiments. Dr. Pierre Barbet was a surgeon that led the crucifixion experiments to prove the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin and believed that science should be employed for more than just “alleviat[ing] the pains of our brothers” that Roach contradicts to expound that helping others is the number one function of