The Last Days Of Socrates Analysis

Superior Essays
In The Last Days of Socrates one gets to examine the character of Socrates through the eyes of Plato himself. Through each of the sections one is able to see the dilemma Socrates battles from philosophical questions, being put on trial for crimes he did not commit, given the dilemma to escape his death or face the punishment, and an explanation of why he was not afraid to die. By the end of the Phaedo it’s easy to see why Socrates is thought of as one of the greatest philosophers of the time with how he justly handles each problem he faces throughout his life.
A. Euthyphro For the question of “Do the god’s love what is holy because of its holiness, or is what is called ‘holiness’ only so called because the gods love it?” I would say
…show more content…
Crito of course had other reasons as to why Socrates should escape, but to Socrates the public’s opinions whether he committed his crimes should not be of concern and escaping his fate of death would be an act of injustice. For example, Socrates explains that it 's not necessary to value all opinions people hold, but regard the sound instead of the flawed (Plato, 85). He also enters the Laws of Athens as a reason to act justly, even in the face of death. For instance, being that the laws have always worked in his favor of keeping the world fair, he understood since he has had a chance to plead his case and he failed to persuade the jury he must now obey the punishment one is to receive for the crime accused of (Plato, 89). Along with wanting to do the right thing by the law; Socrates is also worried his ways of not following the rules will follow him into his next life when he faces the judges of the underworld (Plato, 94). In my opinion, Socrates was right to stay and take his punishment; even though he was not truly guilty, because in Socrates mind he is doing what is gods will for his life. It also showed how much Socrates is willing to follow the extent of the law because of his beliefs that to do an unjust act will only bring an injustice back to him in another form, hence he would rather do what is more right in the eyes of the law than in the opinion of the masses. Also, with Socrates philosophy he believed in the immortality of the soul, consequently he did not believe his execution was truly the end of himself and the arguments against his execution at this time would do no good unless thought to make a difference; which at this point it was too late to hope for the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    These series of questions culminate into Socrates’ conception of virtue leading him to reject Crito’s pleas for him to escapes because if he does he will be disobeying the laws of the state. By disobeying the law of the state he would be committing an injustice and doing what is wrong therefore harming his soul. If he harmed his soul, then he would not be living the virtuous or examined life which he states in the Apology “is not worth living”; so even if he disagrees with the state he must still obey its laws since that is, in his perception of virtue, just and right. This dialogue gives more understanding as to why Socrates questions the views and actions of others and gives practice to Plato’s teachings from Euthyphro and…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A man of principle, Socrates stood by his word even when facing death. However, this prideful unyielding arrogance led to his downfall. Though today we regard him as a progressive, his shocking contrarian…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's The Crito Argument

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the opening dialogue of the Crito, we find Socrates in a prison prior to his execution. Socrates awakens to find his old friend Crito sitting outside his cell “I have been marveling at you, when I see how peaceful you’ve been sleeping” (43b). Crito has come to convince and persuade Socrates to escape his his sentence of execution “I think that if you die it won’t just be one misfortune”(44c). Yet Socrates presents many arguments and lays out the principals that he has chosen to live his life by.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas, proceedings and ultimate judgement had a political hand all stemming from Socrates criticism to the political class, poets, and craftsmen through his philosophical engagements. Socrates was found guilty with a narrow margin, but his proposal for penalty added insult to injury. He also rejected prison and exile, offering perhaps instead to pay a fine. The judge rejected his suggestion and sentenced him to death and with a philosophical statement, Socrates accepted the judgement saying that only the gods know what happens after death and so it would be foolish to fear what one does not know. Further, is there a true measure of guilt or innocence in Socrates’ case?…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also accepts his fate stating that, “it is not difficult, O Athenians! to escape death… it is much more difficult to avoid depravity.” All of his life Socrates taught philosophy and forward thinking, and if he had gone back and begged for a fine or for jail he would’ve thrown away everything he had taught to his students and everything his life had supposedly stood for which is to be moral just and virtuous. Socrates goes on to say that the judges should punish his sons and pain them as he had pained them if they were to exhibit signs of depravity by holding things like money before virtue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates continues to explain how he can’t violate the verdict, which in this case is the death penalty therefore, it would be wrong because Socrates couldn’t go against his principles. Socrates states, “ Come then, if we destroy that which becomes better by the healthful and is corrupted by the distasteful, because we don’t obey the opinion of the experts, is life worth living for us when it has been corrupted? Surely this is the body, isn’t it?”(47e) Socrates is explaining how in his mind life is not worth living unless it is lived appropriately in this case being, that the ethical life is more important than life itself. Socrates continues his justification on why he can’t escape prison because by committing this action he would be doing what he considers as the unjust thing because he would’ve been seen as a dishonorable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 - Synopsis of Reading "Socrates: A Life Examined", Pgs 61-91 In chapter 3 of Socrates: A Life Examined, author Luis E. Navia introduces us to a second Socratic testimony written by another one of Socrates’ contemporaries, Xenophon. Within this chapter we discuss some major bibliographical details of Xenophon and his involvement with Socrates. As well as his most important Socratic works, their significance with the Socratic problem, and their differences with writings of other contemporaries, such as Aristophanes. Most importantly, Xenophon’s Socratic contribution helps shed light on the reason why Socrates seemed to choose death over anything else.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is exemplified when he refutes the charges against him, for example when Meletus argues that he deliberately corrupts the youth of Athens he responds with, “wicked people always do some harm to their closest neighbors while good people do them good, […] if I make one of my associates wicked I run the risk of being harmed by him,” (25d). This rebuttal is arguing that Socrates, because he does not want to be harmed, he would not deliberately corrupt the youth because if he did then surely that wicked associate would bring harm to him. In addition, philosophy to him was a living art, showing how someone should live their life and this is reflected both in his thinking process, also in his death. The action of arguing logically and truthfully without begging, crying, or attempting to receive pity for his children when faced with the penalty of death, is similar to the way he thought only with logic and only spoke truthfully even if the conclusion was unfavorable or if the process put him into trouble. In conclusion Socrates goes about philosophy with a methodical process, using logic and…

    • 1344 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was the main cause of his own death while under trial. In the Athenian system, for this kind of trial, a defendant could suggest his own penalty. Instead of taking this opportunity seriously, Socrates first jokingly said that he should be rewarded instead and put into the same chambers as the Olympians. Obviously, his jurors did not see the humility in this and therefore, passed the death…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was a devoted philosopher who lived pursuing truth and wisdom. He was a very important Greek thinker who worked to discover the form of many things. His conclusions were guided by reason, which is within all people. Using this reason Socrates searched for what virtue was throughout his life so he in turn could live with virtue itself. Although, he may have debated on whether virtue can be taught or not it seems that internally he held of a definition of virtue or at least partially grasped it enough for the truth of virtue to seep into his dialogues.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, Socrates is put on trial for accusations of disruptive behavior. Some men in the community feel that his way of life goes against the will of the Gods and corrupts the youth. As he stands before a jury that will ultimately decide his fate, Socrates states that “the difficulty… is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding the unrighteousness” (Plato 38). Socrates knows that death is inevitable, and repeatedly claims he does not fear it. He believes that it is harder to run from the injustices and evils of the world than it is from death, so he defends his philosophy even after execution becomes the verdict.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics