In these two readings the certain theories such as realism, constructivism, liberalism, and national security are explain and then certain concepts are proven either wrong or the biases that match with these certain theories are found to be not entirely correct and how they relate to international relationships. In Snyder’s One World, Rival Theories he first starts off by explaining how the September 11th attack has put a greater emphasis on national security. This also goes on to introduce realism, constructivism, and liberalism and their basic beliefs. He uses the theories to describe how to better perfect international relations, and which one would be more effective. He also states for each theory how they describe the post September 11th
…show more content…
The women have been seen as fearful and against war for many years which holds no truth to women’s actual support of national security and the war effort. Many have functioned as the backbone both at home and abroad doing everything from caring for the sick and wounded to filling their husbands role in factory jobs and other male dominated occupations. Tickner does a good job of explaining how women such as Condoleezza Rice and many others have played pivotal roles in the issue of national security. Tickner discusses that not only women have been devalued, but also minorities such as blacks and Latin Americans, and how the stereotypical Latin women is a damsel in distress or the man is an uneducated brute warrior. Then Tickner goes on about how feminist view of realism, and how the realist use state-of-nature stories such as how Sacagawea’s presence in Lewis and Clark’s expedition was not seen as a war party by the Native Americans, due to a presence of a women. And that feminist view this idea as essential in that for there to be international peace that women have to play a large role in the state of National Security as men do because they can bring benefits to the debate and solution that many would not expect. The feminist view on National Security is that the conflictual view is only a portion and that one must also see how countries act in cooperation
The women have been seen as fearful and against war for many years which holds no truth to women’s actual support of national security and the war effort. Many have functioned as the backbone both at home and abroad doing everything from caring for the sick and wounded to filling their husbands role in factory jobs and other male dominated occupations. Tickner does a good job of explaining how women such as Condoleezza Rice and many others have played pivotal roles in the issue of national security. Tickner discusses that not only women have been devalued, but also minorities such as blacks and Latin Americans, and how the stereotypical Latin women is a damsel in distress or the man is an uneducated brute warrior. Then Tickner goes on about how feminist view of realism, and how the realist use state-of-nature stories such as how Sacagawea’s presence in Lewis and Clark’s expedition was not seen as a war party by the Native Americans, due to a presence of a women. And that feminist view this idea as essential in that for there to be international peace that women have to play a large role in the state of National Security as men do because they can bring benefits to the debate and solution that many would not expect. The feminist view on National Security is that the conflictual view is only a portion and that one must also see how countries act in cooperation