Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

Improved Essays
Orwell sees the British govern as "an unbreakable oppression, as something braced down. . . upon the will of prostate people groups" on the grounds that he watches firsthand the savage detainments and whippings that the British utilization to authorize their control.{6} Nor would he be able to converse with the Burmese on account of the "utter quiet that is forced on every Englishman in the East." This "utter hush" results from the thinking behind government that says, "Our societies are distinctive. My way of life has more power than your way of life. Subsequently, my way of life is prevalent all around, and it will manage yours."{7} If one is an individual from a predominant society, one must not make jokes, offer confidences, or show in …show more content…
This is a basic misstep; the Burmese who are tailing him expect that, since he now has an elephant weapon, Orwell has chosen to slaughter the elephant.{14} The swarm rapidly develops to more than two thousand locals, which rattles Orwell. As he says, ". . .it is continually frightening to have a swarm tailing you." This is particularly valid for a youthful illustrative of the Queen who knows the swarm will be basically viewing his each move.{15} When he locates the elephant, Orwell "knew with immaculate assurance that I should not to shoot him." The episode of "must" is leaving, and the elephant is gently consuming grass. Orwell "did not at all need to shoot him" and realized that to do as such would be to demolish an important and helpful animal. Then again, the tremendous swarm of Burmese quietly request a show; they expect a "sahib" to act conclusively without faltering. One alternative is to leave, let the elephant live, and endure the criticism of the …show more content…
Considering the giggling, Orwell says, "That would never do." Leaving without shooting the elephant is additionally impossible: "A sahib needs to act like a sahib; he has got to seem unflinching, to know his own psyche and do clear things," inferring that{18} the Burmese will see him as feeble on the off chance that he appears to alter his opinion about killing the beast.{19} The British have made a pleased picture that they request the Burmese regard, however they are caught by needing to live inside that image.{20} Orwell disregards his inner voice and shoots the elephant, and he exacerbates his transgression by botching{21} the execution. Slugs shot into the wrong spot cause the poor creature to bite the dust "gradually and in extraordinary distress." notwithstanding Orwell putting "shot after shot into his heart and down his throat," the elephant lives thirty minutes after its "tormented pants" power Orwell to take off. Numerous years after the fact, Orwell still appears pestered by the way that pride, not need, made him devastate the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Gorge, Orwell writes about an elephant in his essay “Shooting an Elephant” where the main craters is a police man for the British emperor in one of the eastern countries. This police man has an internal power struggle with his duty and internal feelings of what he knows as right. In this country he imply about how the people there are cage and are oppressed by the British Emperor he is also concern with his duty and how the people view him. Even though the policeman is authority figure he takes on the role of the tyrant.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In addition, the speaker of “Shooting an Elephant” is a sub-divisional police officer and a lot of people hate him, thus leading him wanting to please the people by shooting the elephant. Orwell persuades the readers that under imperialism both parties suffer. The author accomplishes his purpose through shifts in verb tense, reflective tone, and specific details to assert authority; metaphor and analogy to demonstrate logic; and a self-deprecating tone, direct reader address, and colloquial language to establish an emotional connection with the audience. Orwell’s shifts in verb tense evoke a…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Destructive Elephant in the Room Throughout time, empire-building has resulted in tenfold more destruction than contributions to the world. From the Mongols to the Nazis, humans have always exhibited their greedy nature by seeking more land without minding the effects. Those left in imperialism’s aftermath experience profound cultural effects such as those seen in “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. The tone begins as acrimonious and bitter then shifts to introspectiveness and strife, highlighting the officer’s views of how Burma and its foreign culture has changed his character.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His humiliation and sense of defeatare conveyed through his compelling words. He shows the audience that through this incident, hereceives a “better glimpse than [he] had had before of the real nature of imperialism — the realmotives for which despotic governments act” (Orwell).The whole essay, with its appeals of ethosand pathos, uses of imagery, and satirical techniques, boils down to the irony between theoutward and inward appearances of a British authority figure in Burma, or any other state withinthe British sphere of influence. This irony shows how imperialism ruins everyone involved— starting from the inner core. Orwell, George. "Shooting an Elephant.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Shooting an Elephant it is interesting to see the juxtaposition that is used during the story. Initially in the story it starts out by saying how great Imperialism is, and the benefits to how society is structured in Burma. In the next paragraph Orwell states how he hates imperialism and that he can not wait for the opportunity when he can leave Burma and not have to represent the imperialistic society. There is a sharp contrast between these two ideas. I would not want to live in a society that is run like this, but for Burma it seems to be a good fit.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secretly Orwell was all for the Burmese people but him being on the opposite side because of his job made people look at him different, they hated him because he stood with a whole army of police officers who believed in imperialism. Orwell strikes an emotion of sympathy and exhibits a relatable feeling that most can feel. A sour bitter feeling toward the ones we hate using himself as an example, he shows a trait of hatred for himself throughout the…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Orwell 1432). Orwell uses his descriptions and diction to make his audience feel uncomfortable and sympathetic to his arguments that imperialism is detrimental and dying in India in the 1920s. Had he simply stated that the elephant died, there would be no parallel to the crumbling of the empire and imperialism. Additionally, confesses that he only killed the elephant “to avoid looking like a fool” (1432). Orwell shows that although he appears to have an important role in Burma, he is just a puppet of imperialism.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does not initially intend on killing the animal, but anti-imperialism and the pressure of the crowd really get to him. Orwell states that the only reason he shot and killed the beast was to avoid looking like a fool which, in the end, caused the author to be thankful that the man was killed because it gave him a reason to shoot at the elephant and he would not get in trouble with the authority. George Orwell uses detailed description of how the people are reacting to effectively show readers how peer pressure can affect people in positions of power. Although Orwell struggled…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Exploratory Writing

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The way the elephant die is so horrible, and Orwell kills it not because of the dangers of the elephant but only because he wants to show off as a "master". I feel so shock when he think that he was "very glad that the coolie had been killed. " I feel like he is so heartless. I know that the villages want Orwell kill the elephant and his position in the empire but it is still scary for me. If I were he I would not kill the elephant and try to save it's life by explain for the villages.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pathos in Shooting an Elephant "Shooting an Elephant" written in 1936 by the British writer George Orwell tells an experience of an author who shoots an elephant during the time of being a colonial police in the British colony of Burma in 1926. Orwell once said: "There is no book that does not contains political tendencies"(Orwell). His "Shooting an Elephant" is no exception. As an anti-imperialist, he uses this short story to express his opposition of colonial rule and resentment of the British Empire. "Pathos is the motivation factor"(Demırdöğen).…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, in addition to using compelling thoughts, Orwell also descriptively uses emotional appeal to show the emotions of his and even the elephant’s emotions. For instance, in the twelfth paragraph Orwell states, “It seemed dreadful to see the great beast lying there, powerless to move and yet powerless to die, and not even to be able to finish him” (789). He continues, “The tortured gasps continued as steadily as the ticking of a clock” (789). Using the emotionally detailed image of the elephant shows how Orwell saw the elephant and his thoughts on how the animal would not die. However, as the essay closes, Orwell analyzes the shooting and how he felt afterwards.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Orwell faces multiple conflicts in Shooting an Elephant. The first is British imperialism. The British took over Burma and they are treating the natives terribly. Second, the natives aren’t taking this imperial government kindly either as they continuously mock Orwell because he’s a symbol of the government and a vulnerable “obvious target” (Orwell). Orwell hates the way the British impose their power on the Burmese.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a person of high authorities can sometimes form a burden on you. This correlates to, “Shooting an Elephant,” by George Orwell, which is about a police officer in Burma. The police officer is a European, so he faces plenty of hatred in Burma. However, one day an elephant goes into “must” state and it is up to this police officer to stop the elephant. The police officer is not justified in his actions as he shoots the elephant to maintain his pride, the elephant is already in peace and there is plenty of social pressure.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Shooting an Elephant” his exact feelings about imperialism was that it is an “evil thing”; thus the reader knows his position right away. The story begins with a mad elephant running loose and the Burmese call on Orwell to kill the animal. Therefore, Orwell makes a troublesome decision on the hunt for the elephant. In the end, he shoots the elephant to, in a way save face from the locals. As a result, the elephant dies slowly and painfully.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “Shooting an Elephant”, it is based on a man who is pressured to kill an elephant that was thought to be wild. This adventure took place in Moulmein, in Lower Burma. Could he have saved this elephant and done what his heart wanted to do? Or was the peer pressure by others to strong? Orwell withheld the…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays