Alternatively, a simpler and less heroic action would be to warn the child of the oncoming train. This would be sufficient enough to save the child, in addition to no cost at the expense of the agent. Henceforth, this action would be optimal for both the agent and child; the agent has no damage to his car and the child is left uninjured. I believe the point Rulli and Millium were trying to make was that of people regularly exaggerate their response to a situation, often increasing the level of harm and resource cost. In the sports car situation, a simple warning …show more content…
An institutional duty to rescue differs to that of an individual duty to rescue in two ways; that is held by an institution rather than individuals and secondly, it is specific to a population. The article details how institutions have set up plans in order to provide cost-effective rescues to lesser need patients, consequently, reducing the number of high cost rescues for the greater population. Limiting the demands of personal interests will additionally limit the force of rescue. As a result of this, the institute ensures their moral obligation to the population fairly and in a professional