Analysis Of 'Rough Justice, And' Time To Assert American Values

Improved Essays
Destiny Bush Essay

“A caning in Singapore stirs up a fierce debate about crime and punishment” (Reyes 181). Both texts “Rough Justice” by Alejandro Reyes and “Time to Assert American Values” by New York Times, have their own point of views with handling the Michael Fay situation. “Rough Justice” is for harsh punishments if laws are broken. “Time to Assert American Values” is going against tough punishments such as caning or death. After carefully analyzing the two text, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice” has the most relevant and sufficient article to support it because of the way the author uses logical reasoning and evidence. Both stories introduce their opinion on that specific topic about punishments. They both have
…show more content…
In “Time to Assert American Values” they feel like the person should be punished, but no with bitter abuse. Another author from New York Times explains’ “So, the argument goes, when Americans express outrage over a punishment that cause permanent scarring- in this case caning,- they are committing an act of cultural arrogance (“Time to Assert American Values” 179). The punishment wouldn't have happened and it wouldn't have decreased the caning of Michael if it didn't spread to America. New York Times also quoted, “Americans concerned with the propagation of traditional values at home should be equally energetic in asserting constitutional principles in the international contest of ideas ( “Time to Assert American Values” 179). The Americans worry more about what's going on in other place than in their our country. Singapore feels like the Americans worry about their own punishments and they handle it their own way. “While this country cannot dictate to the government of Singapore” (“Time to Assert American Values” 179). The American government can't control Singapore’s government but they can tried to encourage them to do the right thing. “Time to Assert American Values” uses logical evidence because it shows facts and information on how punishments should be handled. “Rough Justice” uses anecdotal evidence to show how they judge people by a witness who probably didn’t even see what really happened. “Rough Justice” has many reasons of why that particular story is more credible than “Time to Assert American Values.” Alejandro uses imagery to make the reader understand what would happened if they broke the law. There are many reason to why people got punished like rape, carry weapons, and if your visa expired. This story uses Michael Fay’s story as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The correct way to punish criminals has been an ongoing mystery for many years. Various methods of punishment for criminals are in place around the world, some harsher and more effective than others. In “Time to Assert American Values” and “Rough Justice” two authors present the argument of whether or not Michael Fay’s caning was justified. After carefully analyzing the two texts, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice” has the most relevant and sufficient evidence to support it because of the way the author uses various forms of evidence and avoids faulty reasoning. Throughout “Rough Justice”, author Alejandro Reyes gives different types of evidence to support the punishment of caning in singapore.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Declaration of the Rights of Man says, Be just! The Bill of Rights says, Be fair!” Stuntz had mentioned this in his masterwork, “The Collapse of American Criminal Justice.” I agree with fairness, and that people should not be falsely accused of crimes, the whole enchilada. But some people get mixed up with being fair, and being just. Without being just, we’d have even more crime than we already do. We need to be just, we need to give people scary stories to keep them out of prison.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His views were very similar to Michael Levin, in the case that he felt if torture was necessary it should happen. The difference between Dershowitz and Levin was that Dershowitz felt like there should be a legal document in place in the ticking time bomb situation. His solution to torture is to have someone with high authority make the decision, whether to torture someone or not. My question as a reader is, does immunity validate torture for the soldiers that are distributing it? Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canning or death sentences, you may as well consider them to be the same thing. “Rough Justice” written by Alejandro Reyes, gives more reasoning toward the case of Michael Fay with the author's use of evidence. After carefully analyzing the two text, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice” has the most relevant evidence to support it because the author includes more facts and statistics which allows the reader to better side with his view. Throughout the article, Reyes provides the reader with strong facts to allow the reader to better understand what is happening. In the article Reyes states, “The Vandalism Act of 1966 was originally conceived as a legal weapon to combat the spread of mainly political graffiti common during…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a prime example of why the US should stop their act of being a world police. Those American lives did not need to be lost. Germany and Austria Hungary were fighting a two front war against France, Britain, and Russia and if the US would have not intervened the Germans would have probably still lost the war. Pat Buchanan asks “Why do we tax ourselves to defend rich nations who refuse to defend themselves? Is the security of Europe more important to us than to Europe?” The US gives other countries a false sense of reality that they do not need to defend themselves with their own functioning military, because the United States will do the job for them.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Officers are gaining information the improper way especially since society don’t fully understand their rights. Although they are all very similar, every state has their own version of how they read off the Miranda rights, and if they are not read properly, it can lead to consequences. Overall, it is the Miranda rights are a very critical element of our criminal justice system and more people should learn and understand exactly what it is so they know if they are being…

    • 1304 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, a confession has significant importance in a court of law (Rubin, 2014). Therefore, the investigators can cut corners in their investigative work and still have a high probability of getting a conviction (Rubin, 2014). As a result, ethical issues and concerns are often brought about based on the deceptive tactics used in the Reid technique. The study by Malloy, Shulman & Cauffman (2014), examines why innocent people confess to a criminal act they are innocent of. The findings supported the arguments that people do and the sad truth is, the Reid technique facilitates most of these confessions (Malloy, Shulman & Cauffman, 2014).…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin also strategically uses logos to appeal to the reader’s sense of logic. Throughout the article the author discusses reasons of when torture is justified. Knowing that many Americans consider torture unconstitutional, Michael tries to reason with the audience saying, “Millions of lives outweigh constitutionality.” Even though torture is barbic, the audiences come to sense that mass murder is even more barbic. The piece makes the audience re-think their opinion torture if it means lives will be saved. Levin makes it clear that torture should not be used as punishment, but as a way to prevent future terror.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminology Theory Essay

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As we have the past centuries have been studying the way and why a person has committed crimes as well as trying to understand why behave in different patterns and different types of situations that they come across. One would first use the general theory of crime, which was developed by Michael Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi. Now in this particular theory they both believed that “deviance and criminal acts of self-control”(criminology by Leonard Glick, J. Mitchell Miller pg.176). Thus making an extremely great point, because their understanding was if you showed high levels of self control you would have the less chances of committing the crimes. Where as if you did not have that balance, then you could possibly commit the crime as well…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Summary Of Tocqueville

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tocqueville claims that to be unlawful, one is opposing the majority’s idea of justice not real morality. Real morality and justice are inherent in humankind whereas what governs America is constructed by humans (107). Because Americans feel they have played a role in the refinement of the laws, they feel represented - thus they actually believe in the laws. This is dangerous because when everyone enforces the laws (not just the government's appointed justice keepers) everyone is forced into believing them - no one can think outside morality without being condemned for disagreeing with a government they are supposedly represented by. The idealization of the American government by the people within, forces people to agree with them because to disagree would be to disagree with the majority and the majority has the power to ostracize them.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays