Truman And The Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis

Good Essays
The Holocaust, the Holodomor, and the Ottoman Greek genocide – all examples of infamous massacres throughout the history of the world. Each of these genocides were committed during times of war, and their lack of ethicality is rarely questioned; most come to the consensus that these massacres were inhumane and unjust. But there is one genocide in the world’s history whose ethicality is frequently debated – President Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic bomb on Japan during World War II; this decision led to the death of copious amounts of Japanese citizens, and although the decision is not irreproachable, ultimately it was the proper decision in order to end the war. The brutality and inhumanity the innocent Japanese citizens suffered through …show more content…
Whether it was through the loss of loved ones or the grotesque disfiguration many experienced, the catastrophe the Japanese people suffered through cannot be justified morally by America’s incentive of winning the war. Aside from the devastating physical ramifications, the actions of President Truman also had significant political implications. The reveal of the atomic bomb to the world affected the way the rest of the word viewed warfare as well as “showed how each super power would use any tactic possible to gain an advantage over their enemy” ("The Effects of the Atomic Bomb Politically and Socially"). This ultimately changes the standards of morality during war time and leads to the rapid advancement of military technology. Because the impact of the atomic bomb was so devastating, it prompted many other nations to respond with the development of their own weapons of mass destruction. By approving such an inhumane military act, Truman essentially condones the idea of unrestricted warfare as well as the use of brutish military tactics …show more content…
In an effort to end the war, the American military had been planning a two-phased invasion of the Japanese homeland on November 1, 1945, code named Operation Downfall. This operation involved the taking of the southern third of Kyushu, the southernmost main Japanese home island, several air and naval bases, and the securing of the Tokyo-Yokohama region (Hasegawa). This invasion, each phase more intricate and treacherous than the last, could only result in tremendous bloodshed and destruction for both the Japanese and Americans. In order to prevent further massacre of both parties, Truman made the political decision to utilize the atomic bomb in attempting to defeat Japan. “The principal political, social and military objective of the United States in the summer of 1945 was the prompt and complete surrender of Japan. Only the complete destruction of her military power could open the way to lasting peace” (Stimson). The dropping of the Atomic bomb, if not the deciding factor, played a significant role in forcing the Japanese surrender. Had Truman not made the decision, World War II could have been prolonged by a significant amount and resulted in further amounts of futile bloodshed. Truman’s decision was one not of a genocidal tyrant; rather, it was a decision from a leader of a great nation, attempting to save his people from further bloodshed and end an already extensive and vicious war. The debate of the ethicality of dropping the atomic bombs on Japan is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima, Japan in 1945 proved to be a controversial ending to the Second World War. There were several reasons why the bomb was dropped, but it still remains that the main reason given to the public was to end the war. However, the US used this opportunity to initiate a sense of power over the Soviet Union in order to discourage the spread of communism. President Harry Truman spoke of this bombing at the White House to inform the American public of his reasoning for this atomic bomb, and how it will be known for much more than “the size of the enterprise, it’s secrecy, [or] its cost.”. The immense amount of destruction and devastation seen by the innocent people of Hiroshima is unbearable to come to terms with.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    WWII Was Justified

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On the other hand, many may argue about the damages that Japan had to endure, there were several other countries suffering because of the actions of the Japanese troops. First of all, it is undoubtedly true that the use of “Little Boy” and “Fat Man was cruel, nonetheless, because of the use of the atomic bomb, many lives were saved. It is estimated that 199,000 civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki died as the result. Immediately looking at this number, people would assume that there was no way America would be given a justification. However, we need to consider the other plan that the American servicemen would be forced to undertake if the bombs were not used.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However the use of nuclear weapons would appear to be a solution to properly satisfy the United State’s end of the war military agenda. By 1945 the focus of the war began to shift, and the Japanese military leaders foresaw an inevitable final stand against, the Americans. The Japanese military government began informing civilians to throw themselves at any American Infantry in an attempt to halt the American invasion. The Atomic bombs would be purposed to eradicate the Kamikaze spirit the brainwashed people of Japan. With cryptic detail American officials would decide the matter in which to purpose the Atomic Bomb.Officials aimed to use the bomb’s to amass the greatest possible damage to Japanese industrial factories, and the civilians who worked at said factories.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fact that the United States decided to drop an atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan shocked many people, including U.S. citizens and the Japanese. The U.S. used a brutal force choosing the atomic bomb, as proven by the thousands of deaths caused. The U.S. knew the extent of damage it was causing by deploying the bomb, and some people still question the motives for such a ruthless choice of weaponry. The atomic bomb, however destructive and questionable, seemed to be the only sure way of ensuring “unconditional surrender.” The U.S. took matters into its own hands to ensure an end to war on its own terms. The atomic bomb was, in fact, “a clear step designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender;” however, this statement fails…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the 1940 's, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan ending World War Two. The bombs speedily ended the war with Japan, but not without consequences. Since conquering Japan by land took a lot of resources and manpower, it resulted in many American lives unnecessarily lost. Eager to end the war, President Harry S. Truman decided that the atomic bombs must be dropped on Japan. While it was necessary to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, dropping another atomic bomb three days later on Nagasaki was unnecessary.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Discursive essay on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was entirely justifiable The argument to whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was entirely justifiable has been quite controversial. This is due to the cause that it had negative influences on Japan however America was trying to defend their country as it has been stated that Japan most likely would not have surrendered. Though, the Japanese did suffer with casualties of their civilians and soldiers. The Americans had reasons to drop the atomic bomb. As stated previously the Americans were worried about their life and wanted to end the World War 2 by dropping the bomb.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to an article about the pros and cons of dropping the atomic bombs, the government claimed that one reason for dropping the bombs was to instill fear into the Japanese people. The United States ' possession and usage of the bombs demonstrated their strength to not only the Japanese but also the rest of the world. A counterargument to the bombs is that great tension was created between Japan and the United States ("Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb"). The United States was able to scare the Japanese, thus forcing them to surrender. Although a strong tension was created between the two countries, it would not have been much different had the Americans invaded Japan and killed thousands of their people in that fashion.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays