Plato's Republic: Why Philosopher Should Rule

Improved Essays
In the Republic, Plato is very deliberate with giving his reasons for why the philosopher should rule and what makes her best suited to do so. Plato represents this by comparing the selfless philosopher to the selfish political power seekers as well as displaying long-run benefits of the ruling philosopher. The goal of this essay is to touch on Plato’s arguments of why the philosopher is most fit to rule, accompanied by the dilemmas of choosing and committing to being a ruler that the philosophers face.

Plato uses a few different claims to render his beliefs regarding the ruling of the city. For starters, there is the motivational claim that he makes. There is an old saying that essentially says those who want to (or seek to) rule, should
…show more content…
This claim is because, notoriously, when the question of who should be the ruler arises (in any small or large scaled situation essentially) there is always controversy between social and economic elites and the general masses of civilians. A ruler with philosophical intentions and morals (at least suggested a few times by Plato) can prevent such controversy between the various leveled civilians. Plato believes this to be true because he claims it is an easy task to convince all the citizens that a ruling philosopher is in their own best interest, rather than the politically power-seeking elite (499d-501e). These claims are made even while knowing that every political system is going to be imperfect, and as discussed in class, is something everyone must deal with. Plato, however, is not a fan of democracy and believes the ideology of every desire being as good as any other is a bad way to go through life. Since Plato believes that everything we do is for the “sake of something”, it is evident that he thinks the philosopher has the most selfless “sake” in ruling over the selfish …show more content…
To those who should rule, the dilemmas of taking on the responsibility is seemingly more visible. The dilemma of asking the philosophers to descend into the cave is relevant to this thought because for the philosophers this is not the ideal way to go about their lives. In other words, it is not best for them. Socrates says in book 1 that ruling does not benefit the rulers. This is because rather than living the life of an average citizen, the ruler must control the things that make that city thrive (while living in a cave). “You mean we are to treat them unjustly, making them live a worse life when they could live a better life?” (519d). This is Glaucon saying that its unjust to make the philosophers descend just for the city’s selfish needs. Essentially, philosophers returning to the cave/ruling results in them choosing an option that is not best for themselves but rather for the city (which results in a less than stellar life for the them) and the philosophers staying in the city results in a city that is worse off, being ruled by people who are only going to fulfill their own selfish political needs. There are two accounts however explaining why philosophers should return to the cave. From the utilitarian view, they argue that while a philosopher might be unhappy for a short while when first descending, they will then be able to practice philosophy which will result in more happiness overall. The view also argues

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A ruler needs to be able to interpret the nature of the world in order to rule a just state. Allegory of the cave is used to explain the formation of the philosopher.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy For The State In the Apology of Socrates and Republic, it is argued that philosophy is beneficial for the state. Advantageous can be considered an outcome that is profitable. A state is an area controlled by a ruler. Therefore, the question is whether philosophy is a reasonable method of ruling an area and in what ways.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Virtue Analysis

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Plato taught that every person should focus on the virtue that was most necessary for ones position in society. The most noble of virtues was justice to one’s self, or rather justice is to act in a manner that reflects what is inherent in one’s soul. True satisfaction, according to Plato, can be found in preforming the task to which you are most suited, wither it was what you wanted to-do or not. If every citizen were to place the needs of the state above one’s own happiness then as a collective the state and those in it would be conforming to an order that is the…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Politics 1301 a2) And in an oligarchy, “the poor are few, and the masters of the rich who outnumber them.” (Politics 1290 a4) Plato believed that philosophers should rule as kings because they were seen as the ones to make the right decisions in the just city for they possessed the right…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I argue that Socrates would most likely choose to support the philosopher candidate to be the next president because he would consider the other two candidates unfit to rule. The reason that Socrates would much sooner support the philosopher candidate is that one of the most pertinent conclusions he reaches in The Republic is that only true philosophers are fit to rule a government. I also believe he would side with the philosopher because the prompt particularly states that this candidate has access to the eternal truths of existence because he has a full understanding of the nature of reality (180). Since this philosopher turns out to be a true philosopher instead of a “lover of sights and sounds” who are the pseudo-philosophers…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Piety In Plato's Republic

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, the contention starts with the conversation and introduction of the characters whom serves as a representation of a member of the society. Nevertheless, it started with the thought of Socrates relating piety and philosophy. And to that, the abandonment of Cephalus at the start dont signifies quitting, otherwise it shows relevance as to how Plato wants to represent piety. As the conversation progress, perceptions revealed some paragons to represent what is good, in relevance with how they viewed piety and philosophical inquiry into justice. So as to this, Darrel Dobbs, the author of the article, is a professor of Political Science in the University of Rochester in Milwaukee who studies ancient Greek philosophy and have…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic the state is more important than the individual. The state uses the principle of specialization to separate individuals into three classes. Individuals are evaluated and classified in so that the state can keep the structure of society. Plato the philosopher contends this classification brings the most efficiency and productivity to society. Individuals are not able to make decisions on how they want to be placed in society.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    n Plato 's Republic, an analogy is struck between the state of the city and the state of the soul. While, in the latter case, a well balanced, or just, soul is one that is commanded by reason, and in which the spirited and appetitive parts of the soul play subordinate roles, a well balanced, or just, city is one in which the rulers are commanded by reason, the soldiers by spirit, and the laymen by appetites. The difficulty implicit in this state of affairs is that it does not appear, on reflection, that the so-called just city is truly just, since it would make better sense to say that a just city is one in which everyone has a just soul, rather than to anatomize the city in precisely the manner that the soul is, and on that basis call the…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These men represent the individuals that possess authority, the prisoners only believe in what the overseer’s show them. Plato is writing about the government, teachers, and religious leaders that impact the thoughts and control the views of society. Plato argues that philosophers should rule as kings in the government because all philosophers seek and possess knowledge. In Plato’s utopian society, political rule depends on knowledge not power. The great difference between individuals who seek and possess power and the individuals who seek and possess knowledge is evident in the allegory of the cave.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave lays out a clear framework for how to overcome our submissive nature and achieve enlightenment, while also making the reader well aware of the potential consequences should we stray from this…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much of what is presented in the dialogue has arisen multiple debates among philosophers, psychologists, artists and even the average person. There are a few instances where I agreed with Plato’s beliefs as well as the opposite. One of the clearest concepts of his work is that the rulers of society must have no ulterior motive than to truly help their people and such types of power should not be associated with individual dominance and wealth. Another idea associated with this is that leaders should have true understanding. Though I do not believe all leaders must be philosophers that have attained enlightenment, they must display moral integrity to some extent.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Book 4 of the Republic, Plato discusses what virtues are in this ideal state and how it relates to the individual. For the first time, Plato shows the resemblance between the individual…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, philosophers are seen to be more intelligent. In his famous Allegory of the Cave, Plato explains these beliefs using a short story. He gives his answer to the reason for people’s existence—to attain knowledge and become wise. The people are ignorant in attaining knowledge as described in the story. In his story he argues that among the prisoners, the one to escape and seek the realm of light is the representation of a philosopher.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays