Comparing Plato's Apology, And Euthyphro

Improved Essays
Murphy states that if there are problems in the world, the public will turn to political leaders for help. When those leaders require assistance they turn to the philosophers to aid in making moral decisions. After reading Plato’s Apology, and Euthyphro we are left with the question of what role should a philosophical attitude play in a life that is intelligently lived. The answer is that it is a key component, according to Plato and Murphy, in understanding how everything comes together proving how a philosophical attitude directly relates to an intelligent and morally lived life. Even though these three life styles are directly related I feel as though some explaining of them is necessary to understand why they are such an important role in our lives. Without an idea of what a philosophical attitude refers to, this …show more content…
Intelligent lives, for example, resemble the lives of government officials, politicians, teachers, and even business owners. These are people who would live their lives based on cold hard evidence, but would fail to question the reason why this is true. This is extremely similar to Murphy’s explanation of how an intelligent life must not only question these facts, but must also question why they are accepted as facts. Murphy relays to us “It is not only a question of what is believed but of the way in which and grounds on which it is accepted.”(Murphy 57) Murphy is explaining to the intellectuals that it is not justifiable to merely accept the facts for what they are. This greatly resembles the process that great minds like Einstein use to further develop their research. In some way intellectuals are already living lives with philosophical attitudes by trying to understand how things came to be. Proving that a philosophical attitude is a key component within their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Euthyphro dilemma is started when two questions were presented about the divine command theorists. In the Euthyphro dialogue, Socrates asked if something is right because God commands it, or does God command it because it is right? This created a suggestion about the relationship between morality and religion to be uncertain I think. It seems as if Euthyphro accepts both theories even though as it is being augmented by Socrates to explain further depths of his reasoning. The options offered to the divine command theorist are intended to be logically exhaustive.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The more the philosophers learn, the more they realize how much they don't know.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    here is a central warning that runs throughout Steven Jay Gould's Book, The Mismeasure of Man. Gould alerts the reader to his concerns about the objectivity of science and the role that the scientist has in the corroboration of empirical findings for his or her theory or research program. Gould argues that the science underlying the hereditarian school of intelligence is flawed in that the research and findings are result of a priori convictions of the researchers, not of objective inquir y into the nature of human intelligence. Accompanying the prime fallacy of a priori science are the additional errors of reification, which leads to circular reasoning, and mismatched logic that hereditarians employ while arguing their theories. Throughout…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally he brings up the comparison between a “someone dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge” to“freak biting the head off a live chicken” in order to prove the value of intelligence in the eyes of the public.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Philosophy being nothing else but the study of wisdom and truth.. a greater clearness and evidence of knowledge, and be less disturbed by with the doubts and difficulties of other men. yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind walk the high-road of plain common sense.” (PHK intro 1) In this example Berkeley establishes himself as the “no nonsense” defender of common sense . Throughout Principles, Berkeley often mentions his disdain for simply verbal philosophical questions that are ultimately speculative and accomplish nothing.…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Last semester, I read Plato’s Apology. This is a review of the book that I intend to submit to the Smithsonian Magazine. Plato’s Apology is told from the prospective of the great philosopher Socrates and instead of an apology is his defense in his trial where he is accused of corrupting the youth of Greece. The title Apology is well chosen as it is the exact opposite of an apology—rather Socrates uses his closing remarks to explain why he is not sorry for his actions and that he was actually doing the Greek society a great justice by challenging them to see beyond their own narcissism and perceived infallibility. We learn about Socrates trip to the Oracle of Delphi who claimed that Socrates was the wisest man in the world, and how Socrates…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Late to Apologize In Apology and Crito, Plato portrays Socrates as a man who cared deeply for his city, and never compromised his integrity not even in the face of death. Socrates is a hero who believed that philosophy upheld the integrity of the city, and used it to fight the growing greed, ignorance, and corruption he saw in Athens. Socrates noticed the growing focus on wealth in Athens. He saw that people were eager “ to possess as much wealth …as possible, while you do not care for nor give thought to wisdom or truth” (32) In Apology, He states “ Wealth does not bring about excellence, but excellence makes wealth and everything else good for men.”…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Politics and ethics are two vital components of a functioning society. When these two components are carefully balanced a sate/society can remain organized and fair to its citizens. In a realistic society the idea of what political ethics and human nature consist of varies, but in an idealistic society political ethics and human nature possess a common ground. Political ethics and human nature were a mutual understanding at some point but as societies grew, citizens began to think as individuals instead of as a collective. As a result of this self-serving behavior, inequality and the mistreatment of others quickly followed.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mechanism that allows the book to equate a mind is the theory of functionalism. As described by the theory, a functionally specified entity can preserve its functional status across various changes. In this essay, the book and Einstein’s brain are made up of different systems, but they still have the same functional purpose of replicating and giving off equal outputs in response to various inputs. Thus, the book mentioned in the essay has a mind as it is an elaborate system that exhibits human-like functioning. The idea that although the brain and the book are different systems, but still generate a mind due to equal functioning can be seen through the mouse trap example.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He feels that philosophy should be studied not to answer questions definitively, but to simply ask the questions, his assertion that philosophy is different from sciences, and how his philosophical theories compare to Socrates…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some would say that philosophy and the critical thinking that comes with it is as important to the mind and soul as food is to the body. This influence philosophy has on an individual has been argued as having various degrees by innumerable scholars. One such that makes the case for its relevance is Bertrand Russell, in his The Problems of Philosophy, most notably in “Chapter XV: The Value of Philosophy.” In his writings, Russell strongly illustrates the value philosophy holds and the importance in the study of it.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Apology’ written by Socrates most famous student Plato, is a Socrates dialogue where he is defending himself from the accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of Athens. He tells the court that these accusations are false and he does believe in the gods of Athens. He also tells them that he did not corrupt the youth, in fact the youth followed him on their own free will. According to Socrates the problem was that people who called themselves wise were not actually very wise, their knowledge was based on ignorance thinking that they were wise and he wanted to help them see that true knowledge was knowing nothing rather than believing that they know everything. As philosophy is based on questioning everything,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays