The Interesting Narrative And Other Writings By Olaudah Equiano

1270 Words 6 Pages
Slave trade among Europe and other countries was done to support the economy. People were a good that could be caught at little cost and sold to different countries for profit and be exchanged between slave traders. Despite the fact that Europe's concept of expanding their riches through slave exchange may have been helpful in principle, it was not as much of an advantage as intended. In The Interesting Narrative and Other Writings, Olaudah Equiano recalls his voyage from Africa to Europe and the grievous acts he had encountered in his time being enslaved, yet one thing that especially emerged in his record of slavery is the effect it had on Europe's economy. Equiano says that the abolishment of slavery would assure the rise of the European …show more content…
The main reason for Europeans going to Africa was to gain access to the greatest number of valuable minerals as they could. It was not until the interest for work expanded that the Portuguese initially started to take slaves from Africa (Scofield, 9/19/16). Despite the fact that utilizing slaves for free labor is reasonable, slaves did not produce as much benefit as things like valuable minerals. Equiano says that Africa could have given “an inexhaustible source of wealth to the manufacturing interests of Great Britain, and to all which the slave trade is an objection” which would have easily been appealing to the Europeans. (Equiano, 234). Equiano revealed that Europe was not taking full advantage of African resources like they should have been. He also specifies that goods like cotton and indigo grew all through Africa, which both could have been extremely necessary for producing clothing. (Equiano, 235). Europeans could have expanded their production of clothing by using the resources Africa had an abundance of, instead of reducing the population Africa significantly by enslaving the people who lived there. Europe was not utilizing the resources that Africa had that were easily accessible to them, therefore not profiting their economy to its full …show more content…
Amid this time numerous European nations had a mercantilist economy which implied they would flourish off the riches that could be created through exchange (Scofield 9/08/16). Despite the fact that the riches this kind of economy produced just profited few, riches was influence in Europe. Numerous European nations rehearsed absolutism giving the leader of that nation the greater part of energy. Numerous absolutist rulers had an objective of showing their riches in expand ways, and the riches produced by African assets and purchasers could have added to these showcases (Scofield, 9/08/16). Equiano states ordinarily in his account that the Europeans were avaricious and needed more cash. The voyages amid the Spanish victory were planned to discover new exchange courses, yet an overflow of silver was discovered which provided riches to Spain (Scofield 9/13/16). Africa could have been utilized as a part of a similar approach to separate riches from more assets. Britain could have profited significantly from cotton and indigo that was inconceivably accessible in Africa. Assets like these could have expanded the benefit of England's material assembling organizations essentially (Scofield 9/20/16). This riches would have given the English considerably more cash that could have been spent on expressions or investigation and colonization, which was basic to

Related Documents