Analysis Of Nucountry

NuCountry has a bright future ahead of it after the great compromises achieved at the constitutional convention. However, that doesn 't mean there aren 't obstacles ahead for the newly independent country. In the aftermath of the convention, there are clear winners and losers. The most powerful group would most likely be the working professionals. They 're the middle-class of NuCountry and a socialist economy would only increase their size. The working poor group making up 30% would most likely integrate to the middle-class over time. The working professionals’ current percentage of the population stood at 52% before the convention and could foreseeably increase to 75% of the entire country. The groups that came out the worst off would …show more content…
A stable country can and will lead to a prosperous country, and that sentiment is universally desired in NuCountry. A presidential democracy allows citizens to actually have a say in who leads their country, and a socialist economy gives everyone a decent standard of living. That decent standard of living may be seen as an insult to a small group of people, but to the large group of working poor it’s a blessing. Another key factor was looking at the prosperous countries of the world and how they serve their people. The way the USA, France, and the U.K. operate proved to be a vital blueprint for our young country. In the …show more content…
The second most voted options were for a dictatorship, a capitalist economy, and a unitary state. Quite the amalgam of a country we would 've been, no? Suffice to say, NuCountry would just not be on the path to prosperity we are on now. A dictatorship would have oppressed us all. A capitalist economy wouldn 't be the end of the world, but coupled with a dictatorship means the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. The top 1% would be lining their pockets while the bottom 99% would be in line for government