Analysis Of Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

Superior Essays
Power is not evil, it is the user that makes it evil. Machiavelli, a controversial figure in political history left a legacy of brutal reality which disturbed many people. Niccolo Machiavelli’s, The Prince explores the groundbreaking ideas for a prince to secure the leading position in government and retain his power and leadership. Human nature combined with power has the possibility of becoming tragically destructive. However, that wreckage stems from the environment, and the actions displayed from power demonstrate effective truth which inspires the wickedness in humans. Machiavelli’s logical reasoning exhibits self-interest and preservation which is a habitual characteristic of human nature. Machiavelli states, “And let it here be noted …show more content…
Machiavelli poses the question, “whether is is better to be loved rather than feared, or feared rather than loved” (Chapter 17, Page 43). The patent answer would be it is better to be loved and feared, but fear and love hardly ever converge. Machiavelli’s assessment to this question revives the concepts of human nature and virtue. The aspiration for a prince is to maintain the state, which involves the compliance of the people. Therefore, Machiavelli advocates that being feared is more dependable. Although, he is not prescribing violence, it is only in the interest of the state, which demonstrates human nature and …show more content…
Machiavelli’s advice is there for the people who hold power and exposes the truth in human nature. However, although Machiavelli opens up the honesty of humanity; he teaches that there are a lot of people who are not good, so one must also learn to not be good. The thing that is wrong with this is that evil does not combat with evil. Evil can not conquer evil, good conquers. Therefore, The Prince explores the reality of human nature as self-interested and wicked. Machiavelli deliberately tells the reader the choices of someone holding a power may face, and the environment power gives rise to alters the way the person may act. A choice can change the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli speaks to this conflict of virtuous behavior versus deception when he says, “If a prince wants to maintain his rule he must be prepared not to be virtuous” (50). Without morals, the only guiding force that remains is a conscious action motivated by one’s own rational thought. Once one gives up his morals, he rids himself of the pressure that is associated with being a virtuous person. However, Machiavelli does not entirely preach the notion that – in order to be a successful leader – one must abandon all forms of virtuous behavior. If morality is defined as a demarcation between good and evil, then there must be something to say about the importance of valuing the goodness of one’s nation over its destruction.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that a prince must create a divided self. He says that the only way to create a long lasting fatherland is to be taught evil qualities and display them when beneficial for the state. For example, Machiavelli states that it is well documented that liberality is a good thing, but at times it is far better to seem liberal, but actually be miserly. “A Prince […] ought to care little though he incur the reproach of miserliness, for this is one of those vices which enable him to reign” (Machiavelli, 42). Even though being a penny pincher is not favorable, it enables the ruler to reign and make decisions that are difficult to make.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because he believes man becomes disloyal to the state when times are tough, and the ultimate purpose of the Prince is to maintain order within the state, Machiavelli argues a ruler should be feared. If the prince is loved and circumstances warrant, people are more prone to take advantage of the benevolence of their ruler. Ruling with an iron fist, Machiavelli believes, would ensure obedience from the ruled. Moreover, he does also warn of the dangers of using fear in a negative manner. Never in The Prince does Machiavelli advocate using cruelty for no explicit reason, but instead urges rulers to use it in the interests of the state.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli hence suggests that it is in the ruler’s best interest to set aside previous beliefs about politics and look at the truth. Through the process of seeking truth, Machiavelli is extremely aware of mankind's shortcomings (Prince, ch.17). Being aware of these failures enables him to see that in order to live a safe life one must embrace these flaws. Thus if someone acts in a “rotten” manner he will likely be feared rather than loved (Prince, ch.17). While being feared might seem unnecessary to some, Machiavelli goes on to note that being loved is a much more dangerous way of life because, love, is held by men who are “wicked”.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If he must choose one quality, M claims that the prince is better to be feared than loved, due to people’s human nature. Human nature, according to M, is unpredictable, selfish, and fearful; in other words, in times of danger, people will most likely to flee from danger and abandon their ruler. If the prince is loved, people, who do not have strong loyalty towards the prince, will turn their backs; however, if the prince is feared, loyal citizens will attempt to fight against the vicissitudes and protect their country and the prince. 6. In Chapter 18 Machiavelli discusses the need for a prince to have two natures: a fox and a lion.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also says that defense methods such as war or other methods that justify cruelty must be done. Machiavelli also believes that human nature is greedy and self-interested and that a leader needs to be feared and loved but mostly feared, because fear is consistent with self interest, and that a prince should attend to his own self interests and leaving people alone to keep the nation strong. But Plato's counterclaim to this would be that a ruler can never be just and it is not ok to harm others because that is contradictory to being just. That a ruler can not take actions to far. But because a “Philosopher King” is always seeking knowledge that knowledge would help decide the difference between just and unjust actions.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche presents a potent challenge to morality by saying that Morality is one kind of ethical system that promoting narcosis, calm and passive. It is created by hatred priests who are envying of Nobles’ power and strength and horrified of pain, struggle, and restlessness. It is hindering human flourishing now but yet necessary to help us get into a better post-moral society, finally, enable human flourishing. Nietzsche unfolds his argument by firstly categorize different kinds of ethical system. Secondly, he explains how they those systems change among society and why he claim morality is a new kind of ethical system different from the previous one.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This show how morality varies depends on the society, and on the culture. However, Ishiguro show the possible bad use of this concept, and how the morality of people can be manipulated in a bad way under this concept. In Never Let Me Go Ishiguro shows in the very last sections how people consider cloning as something moral and they do not want to do anything about it. This idea reflect how morality is relative depends on the society. However, in the book Ishiguro shows how controllers with bad intentions are able manipulate this idea to serve their desires.…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter three, Machiavelli writes, “At this point one may note that men must be either pampered or annihilated. They avenge light offenses; they cannot avenge severe ones; hence, the harm one does to a man must be such as to obviate any fear of revenge” (Page 17). By writing this passage, Machiavelli exposes his feelings about cruelty within a government by explaining that it should only be used when absolutely necessary. Therefore, a choice between cruelty and benevolence can be a difficult, costly decision. A leader should put thought into how consequences might ensue due to violence, but also needs to take into consideration what means are necessary to fulfill the needs of the country.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These examples include Machiavelli’s discussion of murder, robbery, and ingratitude (Jackson p.45). For example, Machiavelli suggests that the measures men like King David, ancestor of Jesus, must employ at the beginning of their reign, in order to establish their states, are “most cruel and inimical, not only to every Christian manner of living but to every human manner of living as well (Strauss p.49) .” Strauss does not make an exhaustive critic of Machiavelli’s work, but rather a comprehensive one. Strauss considered Machiavelli to be an extraordinary political philosopher, but he argued that Machiavelli’s work must be considered within the context of the Renaissance (Jackson p.32). Strauss argues that Machiavelli was a true enemy of true faith, calling him immoral and irreligious (Jackson p.41). Machiavelli addresses the difference between the people and an actual prince.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays