Analysis Of Thomas Mann's Mario And The Magician

Superior Essays
The Nature of a Meaningful Life

Thomas Mann's Mario and the Magician is about a family who took a vacation in one of the beaches in Italy. For the purposes of this paper, the nature of a meaningful life will be analyzed based on the article, with Kant and Mill as sources to defend such analysis.

Desires, Emotions, and Moral Choices

Kant believed that desires and emotions do not play an essential role with how a person rejects or embraces morality (Kant, Abbott & Denis, 2005). In fact, morality should not be influenced with desires and emotions because in itself, morality is a sense of duty. As such, actions which are guided by morality do not seek for rewards but instead, such actions seek to fulfill a duty, which should be considered
…show more content…
As discussed above, the narrator observed the legalistic attitude of the people in Italy. When her daughter ran down to the beach naked, they were criminally charged not only for violating the public bathing regulations, but also, they were accused of offending the honor of Italy. Although this conforms to Kant's morality as a sense of duty, the people's legalistic view is stained with Cipolla's shocking business. Cipolla was not only portrayed as someone who practiced some elements of the occult, but he was considered as a tyrant and diabolical for his evil assaults of magic. Considerably, Cipolla's desires do not justify his disregard of moral choices. It is worthy to note that, Cipolla, as a magician, controlled the emotions and movements of the people that is why the latter is easily succumbed to his will. Worse, with such control, Cipolla manipulated, mortified, and mocked his audience. Cipolla's action is a violation of Mill and Kant's ethical theories. For Kant, morality should be a sense of duty. Cipolla did not show any morality because of how he treated his audience. For Mill, a person's actions should result to happiness and harmony. However, Cipolla's action did not result to happiness and harmony because of his use of peculiar …show more content…
In addition, a meaningful life guides a person to make positive contributions, “not only to our personal and spiritual growth, but also to society and the human civilization as a whole” (Ratson, 2016). This definition of a meaningful life is not seen with Thomas Mann’s Mario and the Magician. Most often than not, people with legalistic attitudes are those who wanted to fulfill a sense of duty in one aspect, but tolerates peculiar evilness in another sense. Although this should not be regarded as a hasty generalization, the narrator’s experience proves that in certain instances, morality is associated with hypocrisy. Hypocrisy comes in because while legalistic people reacted to her daughter’s action, they also patronized the magic show of Cipolla which used mockery, manipulation and mortification. Furthermore, upholding morality is not evident with how Cipolla used magic since his actions resulted to his audience’s mockery, mortification, and manipulation. In addition, Cipolla’s actions do not contribute with him living a meaningful

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In most of the essay, the writer also applies to a sense of morality that Christie’s books influence and go by, which is effective in persuading the reader by showing…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people claim that Machiavelli’s book ‘The Prince’ is controversial as it lacks morality. This can be seen as throughout the book, Machiavelli continuously suggests that a prince should do everything in violations. For example,…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the relationship between subjectivity and identity (Pages 3-5)? Subjectivity and Identity often refer to one’s sense of being. The relationship between identity and subjectivity often displays people’s sense of being and ideologies.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle’s Ethics Book I obtains copious themes and ideas relevant to classical political theory. One of the most abundant motifs is happiness and how it impacts humans of all stages. As seen in this book, happiness is not always clear cut; therefore, the ability of humans to achieve this marvel of completeness is often disputed. While virtue and honor are acceptable candidates for this vague idea, happiness must be the good. We only strive for these attributes in order to make ourselves happy; thus, happiness is good (Aristotle, 2002, p. 3).…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with Hume's argument, “morality is sentiment”, because sometimes, my feelings impact my actions and my attitudes. Depending on my feelings, I do things differently than I would do when I am emotionally stable. If it is asked right or wrong, I would say it is wrong because we live in a society where rules are required to obey and follow whether we have born naturally evil or have born good and pure. We can understand someone's action in the view of Hume's but we cannot justify his or her action.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay is solely based on the German philosopher Kant Immanuel and British philosopher Thomas Hobbes in relation to their study on morals. Both philosophers have their own understanding on the topic of morality in which both perceive ideas in their own way. Kant leans toward more of a rationalistic view of morality, emphasizing the mandatory need to ground the prior principle. Meanwhile, Hobbes has taken more of an empirical view of the fact that we ought to do what we believe in is in relation to self interest but both occur in order to take a subjective point. In other words, they viewed the issue of morality from a person-centered approach.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper about ethical theories and cases I chose to discuss the positions of John Mill and Immanuel Kant, due to their dissimilar views on morality and ethical theories. From the four cases, I chose to apply the two philosopher’s theories to case number two. This case states the dilemma “My full-time (but not live-in) babysitter hinted that she would like to use my address to enroll her daughter in my excellent local public elementary school; her neighborhood school is awful. The alternative is for her to send her daughter to private school, a financial burden but not an impossibility. Should I offer my address?”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gordon Marino’s “A Life Beyond ‘Do What You Love’” presents the argument that if one possesses a talent that could benefit humanity and chooses to be comfortable to avoid the discomfort that comes from expanding his natural abilities, he is unethical and is an elitist. His argument is gracefully supported throughout his article with his use of credible sources, like Martin Luther King and Kant, through anecdotes detailing his personal experience on the topic, his use of procatalepsis to protect his argument from counterarguments, and finally through his presentation of logic and deductive…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays