Analysis Of Michael Sandel 's A Professor Of Justice At Harvard

1164 Words 5 Pages
Trying to determine what the right thing to do in a situation may lead to an abysmal void. Michael Sandel, a professor of justice at Harvard, poses his students with many controversial situations that spark different arguments and questions. Along with the situations, he introduces philosophies and moral principles that back up the contrasting perspectives. One of the first things that Sandel presents is consequential and categorical moral reasoning. While a consequential reasoning focuses on morality in the outcome, a categorical reasoning finds it through the actions and the rights. With these reasonings, people can choose what seems to be the right thing to do in the examples that Sandel presents. Some of the questions that were sparked during the examples included whether or not something is ethical based on outcome of an action, if life can be put into dollar amounts, and if there are times when lying is still immoral even when lives are put at risk. Everyone has their own individual morals, but the questions that emerge throughout the lectures that Michael Sandel presents reveal how a categorical way of thinking is the most justified form of moral reasoning.
The first question that is brought up through Sandel’s lectures is whether it is right to overlook the act as long as the outcome reaps the greatest amount of pleasure. This concept is also known as utilitarianism, a moral theory created by Jeremy Bentham. It may seem ideal to pick something that will maximize…

Related Documents