Supreme Court Reflection

Improved Essays
This course continues to be a very fun and exciting course ever since the first day, as I continue to learn more and more about the fascinating cases that were presented in the Supreme Court. Ever since writing the first reflection paper I have learned more about ground shaking decisions that were decided under the Warren court, but more importantly I have learned more about the rights of criminals and the accused. I now understand the great difficulty that the Supreme Court has when deciding upon a case, as many factors are involved. Many situations that are presented in front of the court are not cut and dry, but very complex, which adds another layer of struggle for justices to decide an outcome, as the outcome leads to many changes across the nation. One of the most important cases that we discussed was Mapp v. Ohio, which was decided upon in 1961. This case involved Dollree Map who rented out rooms to people. She was suspected of housing a suspect for a bomb situation, but when police came to search the establishment Dollree rightly refused due to the lack of warrant presented by the police. To me this case was very entertaining to learn about, as later police came back to the home with …show more content…
Virginia. Previously I had always known that interracial marriage was very rare and hardly accepted, but I never knew that it was against the law in certain places across the United States. I had always believed that everyone should have the right to be married and it is wrong for one to deny this right to anyone. Loving v. Virginia led the way for interracial couples to be married, without the interference by law. The Supreme Court decided that the right to marry resides with the individual and not the states. This case confirmed my previous conceptions that the Supreme Court is truly an important part of our government and without it many of the most common and basic rights that we have today might not be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virginia was a major factor that influenced the court’s decision in the Obergefell v. Hodges case. This is important to know because it shows how everything that is decided is influenced by a past. It was important to know that a case like Loving v. Virginia existed, because it influenced the final decision. The case of Obergefell v. Hodges recently changed the lives of many. It changed the concept of something that had stood for one thing only for many years.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US is known for being the land of the free, and for the longest time people left their home countries to experience the American dream. America was looked at to be almost a utopia, where everyone had equal opportunities, and everyone was happy. Without laws this would never happen, and thanks to the constitution, there were certain rules set in place. The judicial review is in short, the power for the court to decide is a law or decision the government made is constitutional, or decent. To start, the Dred Scott vs. Sandford was historical for using this method.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case Loving v. Virginia (1967) was a turning point for interracial relationships. It prohibited laws that prohibited interracial marriages. The acceptance of interracial marriages began to progress, but at a very slow rate. Later on in time, the media began to show more interracial relationships, particularly through television. This was a good sign, but it still was not enough to cause a change, since other television companies chose not to act on the subject in fear of those who did not agree upon the issues, predominantly southerners.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plessy vs. Ferguson case caused many uproars, and speculation to occur. Without this important piece of history, we might could still be seeing the Separate Car Act to this day. They made politics, and higher authorities think of the law they passed, and eventually began to reason with a rightful constitution, and a better humanity. These eye opening men eventually made the Southern government look at segregation in another way, and change their history for the better. Not only did they act on their feelings, they also acted on logic.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the years from 1787 through 1788 a number of papers began to appear that radically changed American government. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote eighty-five different letters to newspapers that helped ratify the Constitution and create a system of checks and balances for the government that the United States should still follow today. The Framers constructed the Federalist Papers to avoid many of the problems that the American government is facing today such as the Supreme Court infringing the boundaries of the judicial branch by creating their own laws. This violation of the delegation of powers can be seen in the upcoming case that will soon be decided on April 28th, 2015. The goal of this trial is to force every…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Explain the Civil Rights Acts. United States courts and legislatures have a reciprocal reliance with each other. In order for a legislature to act, it requires constitutional authority. While courts require legislative/administrative support to utilize court orders and target political support.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Loopholes Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I reflect back on the modules we covered during this semester, two particular topics really grabbed my attention “Wrongful Convictions” and “Justice Reinvestment.” These two particular topics provided me another perspective how America’s adversarial system has some deeply rooted flaws embedded it. In which, these flaws have created loopholes in the legal system to allow the local, state, and federal agencies to manipulate the people’s ‘due process and protection against self-incrimination’ during questioning of investigations by law enforcement agencies. In which, walks a fine line with these loopholes in the adversarial system to violate people’s Constitutional rights in the 21st century.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1954, the Supreme Court shifts its support of protecting economic rights during the Lochner era, to a commitment to equality liberalism. Brown is a proper use of the Supreme Court’s power. Its four valid shortcomings reveal the support Brown had from other political actors. Brown’s support provides the court legitimacy for their ruling and provided an era for equality. This era of equality allowed the court and social movements to work in synergy.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I went to Kings County Supreme Court. Its located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn NY at September 21 at 2:30 pm to 4:40 pm under Honor Francois A. Rivera from Part 52. The case type was civil and type of the proceedings is a trial. There were 8 jurors in the stand. Mostly male and about 2 females juror.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Texas Equality

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lawrence v. Texas is a highly significant case for the Gays and Lesbians, and a turning point for these Texans. The case violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and came to a decision that citizens of Texas are able to legally have personal relationships without the fear of punishment or criminal classification (Lawnix.com). Along with that, there have been major developments such as the legalization of Gay marriage. This group of people do not have close to the equality they deserve, and the respect that they need, but there has been a great amount of improvements for them to achieve equal…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Malpractice Case

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Medical Malpractice Why it went to court. Mary Carnahan HA 210 Medical Law and Ethics October 31, 2014 Introduction We are going to take a medical malpractice case that went to court. Research the case to see why it went to court. I chose a medical malpractice case from Phoenixville, PA.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays