Machiavelli: The Qualities Of The Prince

Decent Essays
What are the aspects of a well respected and powerful leader? In "The Qualities of the Prince", Machiavelli suggests ideas that justifies the means for preserving political authority. Most of the his advice is related to better administration and management of public opinions and satisfaction under different situations. However, his methods were often seen as manipulative even though he did not rule out the use of such tactics when required. Machiavelli suggests that an ambitious prince looking for a model to follow should imitate Cesare Borgia, the dictator of Italy. Cesare Borgia is considered to have been the most capable leader and the embodiment of what a prince should be. Machiavelli uses many events of Cesare Borgia 's life to illustrate …show more content…
Machiavelli suggests that a prince must "never raise his thought from the exercise of war" (222). A prince must be a strategic planner and always be prepared for invasions or conquering over another empire. Machiavelli was impressed by Borgia because of the aggressiveness and speed of planning and execution, he had that made him a successful conqueror. "Intelligent, cruel, treacherous, and ruthlessly opportunistic", all words used to describe Cesare by Machiavelli in "The Qualities of the Prince" (Biography 1-4). Cesare was a blood-thirsty leader who held the ability to rule over people because of his connections with the church. Not only that but he had the money to conquer others with his father 's revenue that he earned over the years in the church. Cesare was undoubtedly a master of political-military maneuvers, and it was a combination of the two that brought him his success and made him feared all over …show more content…
Machiavelli thought that a prince should be considered merciful and not cruel, but at the same time doesn 't overuse his forgiveness. Machiavelli explains that, "Cesare was considered cruel; nonetheless, his cruelty had brought order to Romagna" (227). A prince shouldn 't worry about how cruel is he being when it comes to the matter of how loyal his people are because they are fearful of him and will not try to overthrow him. Cesare is more compassionate than others because he doesn 't let disorder happen in an empire, which causes murder and plundering that causes harm to the community. Machiavelli recommends that others who wants to be a leader should have a mindset such as Cesare, who never let anyone see him other than be brutal and ruthless. Borgia followed a specific motto "Either Cesare or Nothing" which meant its either his way or be punished for defiling his law (Britannica 2). Cesare was merciful to only the people who could benefit him and not be considered a threat to his empire. He held many allies from the church who could appeal to the people to make Cesare seem like a savior rather than a murderer. Not only was he feared by his people, they respected him because they believed his methods was to protect them by any means

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Is Machiavelli’s The Prince an amoral book, an immoral book, or neither? Fully discuss, illustrating your answer with ideas from the book. Machiavelli has gained a reputation of a cold-hearted, ruthless and cynical man mainly based on his famous book: “The prince”. The book itself is generally considered either immoral or amoral.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Watching his home of Italy falling into disarray under weak and divided government, Machiavelli criticized Christian ideals of princes by claiming that “one who abandons what is done for what ought to be done” is welcoming destruction. Examples of his rejection of Christian values in favor of necessary political policies are his instruction that it is “safer to be feared than loved,” and his advice that a leader (in his case a prince) skilled in deceit will “always find those who allow themselves to be deceived.” His…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Cesare’s rule predates The Prince, he encompasses all of Machiavelli’s political philosophies presented in Machiavelli’s writing. His rule was not perfect however, Cesare did have a fatal flaw which prevented him from becoming the leader he aspired to be. Cesare had become an impressive leader not on his own, but by inheriting his power to rule from his father Pope Alexander VI. Machiavelli describes Cesare’s attempt at leading an attack on foreign lands “...he wanted to maintain it and proceed farther ahead, two things impeded him. One was his own army, which to him did not seem faithful”(60) explaining that Cesare was held back by his reliance on borrowed troops.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccoli Vs Machiavelli

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Elisa When many leaders rise into power they think about how they will rule and whether it is better to be loved or feared as a leader. It is better for a leader to be loved than to be feared because when you lose in battle or cannot deal with chaos in times of defeat or trouble, your people will turn against you and revolt. According to Niccolo Machiavelli it is better for a leader to be feared than to be loved, if they cannot be both. Niccolo Machiavelli was a Renaissance humanist and Italian political and military theorist.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli and The Prince Introduction Niccolo Machiavelli is a famous statesman, thinker and one of the founders of modern political science. He was born in the year 1469 at Florence. That is the age of political chaos. The whole country was separated to city governments。In this case, he wrote his masterpiece, The Price, which to be as much praised as blamed. Machiavelli used terse and forceful words elaborate his argument, which had a profound influence in history.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His rise to power started off as a young patrician who was looking for power politically and in a military sense. Based off of his wits and connections to Crassus and Pompey or in other words the First Triumvirate he gained all of the power he needed to eventually become dictator. He was also fantastic and maintaining his power and growing his popularity amongst Romans that originally did not believe in him. He used force and brutality during wars and in his Conquest of Gaul to show he was for real to all of the people that took him lightly. He cut off people’s hands or heads if they did something incorrectly which may seem harsh but it was required to show that he was serious.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the actions of the prince "should display grandeur, courage, seriousness, and strength" (Machiavelli, Skinner and Price, 2009, p.64). This was not the case of Agathocles, whose actions were not perceived as honorable. Even though Borgia was considered cruel, he kept his subjects united and loyal, for this reason, he did not worry about "incurring a reputation for cruelty"(Machiavelli, Skinner and Price, 2009, p.58). In this case, Machiavelli identifies the importance of using virtù in creating the prince's…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays