Analysis Of Machiavelli 's ' The Qualities Of The Prince ' Essay

1137 Words Oct 2nd, 2016 5 Pages
Niccole Machiavelli (1469-1527) was a aristocrat whose fortunes wavered according to the shifts in power in florence.219 He was suspected to crime against state and imprisoned.219 Even though he was not guilty. He had to support himself as a writer instead of continuing his carrier in civil service.219 He believe in brief and to the point writing. Machiavelli is less poetic and more pragmatic then Lao-tzu.220 In this article he uses rogerian strategies because he gave an opinion and was trying to prove it right by explaining it with further examples. In the article “The Qualities of the Prince”, Machiavelli describes the way how a prince should act to a certain situations and what qualities does a prince have to have to be a better prince. He describes a prince duty concerning military matters, whether it si better to be loved than to be feared or the contrary, and avoiding being despised and hated. He used aphorism as a another rhetorical weapon. An aphorism is a same that a concise statement of a principle has been accepted as a true. A prince who doesn’t understand military matters… cannot be esteemed by his own soldiers, nor can he trust them. Machiavelli explained the prince duty concerning military matters because a prince should know how to command a military, how to make instead decisions during wars. Otherwise the soldiers are not going to respect him because he doesn’t know how to deal with military matters. To be a…

Related Documents