• Home Page
  • Compare And Contrast Lincoln And Stephen Speech

Compare And Contrast Lincoln And Stephen Speech

Superior Essays
Show More
Darshan
History 1301
Joseph Davey
Oct 30 2016
Slavery in U.S. focusing on Lincoln and Stephen speeches
The African slavery started in North America in 1619 at Virginia. In 1936, American built the 1st slave ship launched from Massachusetts. The proslavery and antislavery had the battle in out frequently with violent outcomes in making the opposition expand to slavery to became the defining issue for the Republic Party. Both Lincoln and Stephen speeches’ had a historical explanation of the United States and analysis of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Lincoln speech had some significant on the slavery issue. Those who were defending slavery included economics, religion, legality, and history to further their arguments.
Lincoln and Stephen Alexander both delivered speeches about Kansas-Nebraska Act. Stephen in U.S was the architect of legislation which stated that it was of choice for settlers in the new territories on the option to adopt slavery or not. This was the violation of …show more content…
This was seen mainly in New Mexico and Utah in the Compromise of 1850. Stephen had a belief that popular sovereignty was going to give an easy solution to a heated issue. In result, it only encouraged the sectional tensions that were later lead to the Civil War. The passage of the Kansas- Nebraska Act in northern Illinois was incorporated with a wider spread of hostility. In 1854, Stephen was moved to fight for the legislation which he had passed through congress. During 3 October 1854, he put forward that the rightness of the act was lying in the principle of self-government. This was extending slavery to the people themselves. He also stated that popular sovereignty was not resulting in the extension of slavery as the soil and climate in both Nebraska and Kansas to staple crops such as tobacco and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq Analysis
    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq Analysis

    The Kansas Nebraska Act let the people of Kansas decide through popular sovereignty if Kansas would enter the Union as a free or slave state. Lots of people with different opinions flooded into Kansas to get their voices heard. This political confrontation was a boiling pot, which eventually boiled over; this event was and is still known as Bleeding Kansas. Bleeding Kansas was basically a massacre between a pro and an anti- slavery group. It started when James Doyle and his brothers (pro slavery) sacked the city of Lawrence. John Brown didn’t like this too much and led his men in the dead of night to the Doyle’s cabin, they then proceeded to kill every single man in the cabin, this is also known as the Pottawatomie Massacre. Shortly after Bleeding Kansas Charles Sumner was giving his anti-slavery speech about the Kansas-Nebraska act to the Senate. Preston Brooks, who was a pro-slavery senator from the South beat Sumner down and nearly killed him with a cane on the floor of the Senate. He is congratulated when he returns to the South. He also receives a lot of canes as gifts from people. (Doc. E). This basically put the nail in the coffin for the hopes of compromises and predicted the violent war that is approaching. In his speech on October 15, 1858 Abraham Lincoln talks about his thoughts on slavery. “Is it on this same mighty,…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Was Slavery Important In American History
    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was Slavery Important In American History

    One prominent abolitionist was john brown he stated “Here, before God, in the presence of these witnesses, from this time, I consecrate my life to the destruction of slavery!” the fight for slavery can be seen throughout history, it was strong and continued to grow the fight proved to be inevitable. A pivotal turning point in the fight against slavery was the election of Abraham Lincoln in the 1860’s he was a republican, who supported the freedom of slaves. This election was truly the tipping point that led to the civil war and left many southerners struck with fear. Lincoln issued 75,000 troops establishing the federal blockade of southern rebel ports, and suspended the writ of habeas corpus , the civil war had officially begun in April of 1861 (Jaffa,1). The war ended in 1865, the powerful slave owners were faced with hard times and little money without the ownership of the slaves, on the other hand, the north grew rich. Lincoln was one of the most important presidents in history especially during slavery he was able to end slavery and keep America together.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Research Paper
    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act Research Paper

    When the pro-slavery people in the south heard of the Kansas Nebraska act, they rushed thousands of their supporters to those territory's so they can sway the vote for slave state. The vote did go in the direction the pro-slavery party wanted because Kansas was voted a slave state. “Most of the people that lived in Kansas wanted the territory to be free, and when they found out that the vote was swayed they were furious”(History.com). The…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown's Attitudes Toward Slavery
    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Brown's Attitudes Toward Slavery

    He learned that the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed lands north of Mississippi could now legalize slavery – this had been illegal since 1820 – and divided the Kansas Territory into two new states. Kansas would be a Free State and Nebraska a Slave State, so Brown departed for Kansas, determined that it should all become a Free State. Brown gave anti-slavery speeches in Ohio and stockpiled weapons and munitions there before continuing on to Kansas.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Tallmadge In The Missouri Compromise
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James Tallmadge In The Missouri Compromise

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nullification Crisis Dbq Analysis
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nullification Crisis Dbq Analysis

    Lincoln ran on a platform of a northern party, which caused many southerners to strongly disagree with his ideologies. These differences between Lincoln and the southern people were a large factor in why the south began to secede almost immediately after Lincoln was elected. In 1858, Lincoln gave a speech, during the Lincoln Douglas debate, which is partially documented within document G. In his speech he describes how the discussion of slavery had invaded many different places throughout the society. It had invaded churches, home, and jobs. This debate over slavery was to morally devolved for a simple compromise to end the disputes. In document H, it can be seen that Lincoln’s election was highly disputed and disagreed upon. By the time 1860 had arrived, political parties of the north and south were based more strongly upon morals than on political beliefs. This shift in party reasoning caused the likeness of compromise to continue to…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    Both Kansas and Nebraska mounted in cross-border acts of violence over the terms of slavery. As a result of the Kansas-Nebraska act, the conflict was a main point of argument the North had on the continuation of slavery in the West. The conflict between the North and the South’s rhetoric behind slavery caused them much tension. Abraham Lincoln gave a campaign speech referring to the Democrats as bushwhackers and informants of false information that cannot be justified (E). Since the Democratic Party inhabited much of the southern lands of the United States, this perception of the Democrats similarly denounced the ideals of the south. This claim drew a political wedge among the Democratic and the developed Republican Party that Lincoln was a part of. The abolitionist perspective of the North attributed to their growing hostility towards the southerner’s ideals about slavery as shown in Lincoln’s denouncement of southern ideals. Frederick Douglass, a free African-American author, reminisced about his relationship with John Brown and how he respected him very much, so much to claim that it is an “honor to ourselves in doing and honor to him, for it implies the possession of qualities akin to his” (F). Frederick’s heightened respect for Brown stems from Brown’s purpose of his cause. John Brown sought to free slaves in his attack on Harpers Ferry. Frederick, as a former slave himself, took up the responsibility of supporting and leading the abolitionist movement across the nation. His purpose in writing to an abolitionist group the greatness of Brown is to influence the…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    To What Extent Was The Civil War Predictable?
    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To What Extent Was The Civil War Predictable?

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states. Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War. (kincaid’s class…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Dred Scott Vs Sandford
    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Dred Scott Vs Sandford

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Controversy
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Controversy

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    Two years later, in 1854, President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act mandated popular sovereignty, which allowed settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders. This bill overturned the Missouri Compromise’s use of latitude as the boundary between slave and free territory. Conflicts arose which led to a period of violence, known as Bleeding Kansas. One event after another occurred, such as the Dred Scott Decision and John Brown taking armory at Harpers Ferry. Lastly, in 1860, Abraham Lincoln won the Presidential election. The South threatened to succeed from the Union if Lincoln was elected, and they followed through. This quickly led to the Civil…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Sumter Causes
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fort Sumter Causes

    However, Nebraska was not yet a state and if they joined they would be considered a free state because slavery had been outlawed. Senator Steven Douglas wanted Nebraska and Kansas as states so a railroad could be built to bind all the states together. For these reasons, Steven pushed for the approval of the Kansas-Nebraska act in 1854. The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed white citizens to vote in favor of slavery or against it, this was also known as popular sovereignty. This led to outrage in northern states because the Kansas-Nebraska revoked the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska are both northern states so they would have been considered free states according to the Missouri Compromise. But since the southerners wanted them as slave states, they pushed out the Kansas-Nebraska act…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Sam Houston's Heroic Decisions
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sam Houston's Heroic Decisions

    Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 revoked the Missouri Compromise and gave people in western territories the ability to adopt slavery. The choice of adopting slavery was very popular. Sam was one of only two senators who voted against slavery. He warned that is would lead to warn and one would have a victory and the other go down in a sea of blood and smoking ruin. Lawyer the Texas Senators voted to condemn Houston’s position. Houston integrity because although everyone thought that slavery was a good choice, Houston knew it wasn’t right. He also showed his concern for others because he didn’t want the slaves to be forced to work and not have the freedom or equal…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Expansionist Campaigns
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Expansionist Campaigns

    With the passing of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the increasing Caribbean slavery projects, both pushed by Douglas, slavery was legal in any US state or territory. With slavery having a legal stand to expand into the south, Douglas pushed even harder for the U.S. to expand into the south. The Caribbean expansion initiative and and the potential US acquisition of Latin American territories placed the country in the position in which they had to chose whether they agreed with the expansion of slavery or…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

    Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights. This Decision of the justices as well as the Kansas-Nebraska Act voided the Missouri…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings