Analysis Of Lifeboat Ethics Garrett Hardin

Great Essays
In “Lifeboat Ethics: The case against helping the poor” by Garrett Hardin, the author points out many reasons for his main argument that rich nations should stop giving foreign aid to the poor nations that are in need. The well-developed nations, including the United States of America and other European countries are known for the aid they offer whenever a country is in need. However, Hardin claims that giving a foreign aid to other countries in need will be detrimental to the rich nations’ economies. He explains his claim using the “Lifeboat Metaphor” in which the rich nations represent the people on the boat. The poor, in contrast, are represented by the swimmers trying to climb on the boat. Hardin believes that taking in additional 10 people …show more content…
It is not accurate to say that the third world countries are always dependent on the rich nations. To say that “it is time to refuse to give aid in the form of food to needy countries that do not accept responsibility for limiting their population growth (Hardin 204)’’, is definitely unethical an contradicting as well to what he has studied while he was in school. One thing that very much makes his reader question his stance of aid is his ethics and humanitarian perspective. He explains in many occasions throughout the text that programs such as “food for peace program” (Hardin 205), will only do harm than benefit the countries eventually. Because of the failure of the food for peace program, Hardin assumes that the newly developed program called the World Food Bank, will also fail because of human greed and it will do no good but harm those who are in need. From an ethical perspective, even if it the Food for Peace program were to fail, the program should at least be tried. Hardin is very skeptical when it comes to foreign aid and he encourages the rich nations to stop helping those in need and basically this in his perspective teach them a lesson to control their population and get themselves out of the situation they are in. He claims that foreign aid is only going to hurt these nations and they have …show more content…
In the Christian Paradox by McKibben, he pointed out that “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (McKibben 272). Poverty is a cyclical and one of the cause is unexpected natural disasters. Nothing could be expected and so, like McKibben says, it is up to the rich to help those in need and the rich nations should help those in need because when and if one of the rich nations are stricken with some unexpected natural disaster and causes a damage to the people and the economy, then these rich nations would need and expect the other nations to help out with whatever they can. The poor nations are not poor because they wanted to but because they didn’t have the choice. Also most of the third world countries are poor because they were robbed off their resources by these rich nations. Hardin is very much unethical to say not to help others because it would cause the rich nations to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics, he emphasizes on the ethical issue of how to judiciously help the poor and the argument behind it. In the beginning of the essay Hardin responds to the comparison of Earth as a spaceship, by stating that it can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists to justify suicidal policies for sharing our resources through uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid. Interestingly enough, he prefers to address the issue with a lifeboat metaphor, in which refers to the rich nations (such as the United States) as being aboard the boat, as well as the poor nations who are swimming around the boats for…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Boat Ethics Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: In the final chapter of Come Hell or High Water:Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster Michael Dyson looks at how different groups use religion in the face of a natural disaster. In Hurricane Katrina there were essentially two groups that were a part of the disaster: poor, black victims and those that were supposed to help them. For those that are in a position to help, they often view natural disasters as a means for God to punish sinners and for those that need help they look to God as a comfort and as a way to cope. In the chapter, Dyson discusses how several Christian role models made similar statements about how New Orleans is a hub of sin and that the citizens of New Orleans snarl in the face of God until they need help;…

    • 1072 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead he’s advocating that more can be done to help people in poorer countries. He gives an example of how a lot more money is spent of questionable things such as the Anglo-French Concorde project which was projected to cost £440,000,000, while Britain to that date, had only given £14,750,000 to the East Bengal refugees. In addition, Hardin’s argument doesn’t prove that Singer is wrong because Singer accepts that giving and helping is important but controlling population growth is important as well. Singer says that “I accept that the earth cannot support indefinitely a population rising at the present rate… The conclusion that should be drawn is that the best means of preventing famine, in the long run, is population control”.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense of the survivors’ guilt arising from not helping the poor, he claimed that “the net result of conscience-stricken people giving up their unjustly held seats is the elimination of that sort of conscience from the lifeboat”. He defined guilty about one’s good luck as a type of conscience and the newcomer’s lack of guilt about the rich people’s loss as conscience drain; but the author deliberately omitted the morality of rich people’s indifference to the poor asking for help. Counting the negative effects on total conscience in the lifeboat if no rescue is attempted, the final solution to the lifeboat dilemma might be changed. Essentially, the author’s negligence of social injustice against impoverished people and the ethical issue indifference is just a result of his bias for the rich countries.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suppose there was a boat with only ten available spots left, the answer for all three suggestions Hardin suggested is simple. First, allow the extra ten people on board, of course with the most sensible selection of those ten. Then let the others know that you will come back for them, meaning you will try to do your best to think of a solution to help the poor. Next, look for others who would be willing to help get the others out of the water. For example, the wealthy should contribute with shelter, clothing and food for the poor.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the essay, Hardin relates overpopulation and tragedy of the commons to the Lifeboat analogy-thus Lifeboat ethics should be used. (Main Argument) Singer’s essay is trying to convince that everyone should reduce suffering by any means necessary. He puts a great emphasis on helping those who are distant from us. Singer links this case back to the analogy of the drowning child, he argues that if there are a lot of people surrounding the drawing child and no one is helping him out-…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. In other words, it is the study of what is wrong and right, good or bad. Humanity has been intrigued with the answer to these subject matters for hundreds of years. In that time there have been several philosophers such as Aristotle who have formulated moral theories like Virtue ethics. Not all of these theories are put in practice today but they do help in the solving of moral issues.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, he talks about the spaceship image stating that we should share all resources. Hardin discredits the metaphor by suggesting that a true spaceship would be under the control of a single captain; which the world is not. He instead goes on to portray the lifeboat ethic, by the world being a lifeboat with only enough room for a few people. This leaves the majority of the people in…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, consequently utilitarianism does not support not giving to famine relief, validating Singer’s claim that giving to alleviate famine is a moral…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through examples from lecture and the article, I will review how this is a beneficial article to understand. Hardin goes into detail about how with every country having a different population causes for unequal resources needed. In the article it discusses the options that could be used to help countries where there is overpopulation and hopefully stop the hunger of many people. This is done through the discussion of The World Food Bank and a number of programs for improving agriculture in hungry nations called “Green Revolution”.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hardin’s ultimate goal is to persuade readers to go against their morals. Throughout his essay he is harsh in his logic, but it makes sense and seems to float the lifeboat. However, in the essay “Asking How Much Is Enough” Durning believes the poor are not solely to blame for overconsumption. The wealthy are letting lifestyles destroy the earth because they are consuming more than is needed.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays