Karl Popper Philosophy

Improved Essays
Considered one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century, Karl Popper is mostly known for his contribution to philosophy based on his scrutiny on the scientific method. Popper played an important role in combining the work of science and philosophy in attempts to uncover the truth. When Popper becomes a reader in logic and the scientific method is where we begin to see the emergence of the Popper we know, especially in the development of his views regarding science and philosophy. Unlike every scientist, Karl Popper believed that science was all about falsification, the process of refuting one’s own theory, rather than searching for confirmation.
The presence of Karl Popper and his work in philosophy allowed for various scientists at
…show more content…
Distinguishing the differences between science and pseudo-science can be problematic, which is why Popper decided to use Einstein’s Theory of Relativity versus Freud’s Theory of Psychoanalysis. As Popper observed the work of each of these scientists, he realized that in order to create their theories, they both had to take different scientific approaches. For example, Popper began to realize that Freud could make absolutely any data point work in favor of his theory. In his paper, Popper provided a case where a man would push a child in hopes of drowning them, or a case where that same man would sacrifice his life in attempts to save the child. Popper argues that Freud can make sense of both scenarios. To Freud, the justification for the man pushing the child can be seen because of his repression. In the case of the man saving the child, Freud states that it is because the man has reached sublimation. Unlike Freud, who would look at the past to explain the present, Einstein would look at the present and attempt to predict the …show more content…
When defined, fortune telling is the practice of predicting a person’s future by creating connections based on the information found around them. For example, certain practices of fortune telling consist of palmistry (the act of foreseeing someone’s future by reading their palm) to phrenology (the act of reading tea leaves, or consulting tarot cards). Fortune telling is rooted in the idea of providing vague information, the interpretation of unclear messages, or a statement of inevitable events. When we analyze the theory of fortune telling under Karl Popper’s standards, it is clear that it fails to meet them. To begin, fortune telling was created around magic and superstitions, two beliefs that search for confirmations around the world to prove their existence rather than to disprove it. When individuals interact with a fortune teller, it is quite easy to hear phrases such as “I sense that something extraordinary will occur”. This one simple statement is vague enough allowing it to be interpreted in various situations like getting promoted, starting a new relationship, or acing a difficult exam. Similarly to Freud’s theory, fortune telling modifies it’s theory based on the data point provided to reach confirmation instead of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Science and scientific investigators must doubt themselves and question everything, and this inquisitive behavior is shown by the great scientists in the past. Barry uses allusions to the works of famous scientists to show that even the greats from the past have the same characteristics of questioning everything that successful scientists today have. John M. Barry first alludes to a great psychologist from the nineteenth century named Claude Bernard who “said ‘science teaches us to doubt’” (Barry). By referencing Claude Bernard, Barry shows the audience that scientists doubting themselves is not a new concept.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Phyllis Wright wrote a letter. She was in the sixth grade. Phyllis wrote Albert Einstein. He won a Nobel Prize in Physics. Phyllis asked, “whether scientists pray, and if so, what do they pray for” (Einstein 9), in her letter to Einstein.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keith E. Stanovich, the author of “How to Think Straight About Psychology,” explains different aspects of psychology to his readers in the first chapter of his book. He starts off by stating how Sigmund Freud is a fraud when it comes to psychology. Although Freud’s work in psychology is so little, he is the reason why many people misunderstand psychology. Then the chapter begins to talk about how psychology is composed of different topics and studies, and when there are many different topics it is difficult to link all of the topics into one. When psychology is often discussed, many people do not consider it a science.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is the demarcation problem a philosophical pseudo-problem? For a long time in history, philosophers of science have dedicated to the construction of a boundary between science and pseudoscience. Despite the substantial efforts putting into the demarcation problem, none of those well-known demarcation criteria successfully classify science or pseudoscience. The failure to provide a universally accepted demarcation, or at least gain acceptance from a majority of the community, leads to two assumptions: the unique features shared by all sciences are not yet found; alternatively, there is no such criteria distinguish science and pseudoscience, therefore, resulting in the fact that the demarcation problem is likely to be a pseudo-problem from a philosophical point of view.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some would say that philosophy and the critical thinking that comes with it is as important to the mind and soul as food is to the body. This influence philosophy has on an individual has been argued as having various degrees by innumerable scholars. One such that makes the case for its relevance is Bertrand Russell, in his The Problems of Philosophy, most notably in “Chapter XV: The Value of Philosophy.” In his writings, Russell strongly illustrates the value philosophy holds and the importance in the study of it.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On top of that. Popper says a theory can also be falsified. Therefore, Carnap stops at the point where if anything is unscientific, it is meaningless while Popper is able point out that if something that is scientific, it can be…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience is one of the Gordian knot problems in the field of philosophy of science. Several proposals have been made in this regard. Karl Popper proposes a ‘falsification principle’ that aims to test the scientific status of a theory. Kuhn has brought forward a claim against this principle that it is only applicable to occasional revolutionary parts rather than the most part of science. However, another attempt has been made by Lakatos in which a progressive research program draws the distinction between science and pseudoscience.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under this view, science exists as a system through which we can logically falsify theories. This stands as the central role of science. In this Essay, I will describe Popper’s Falsificationism and its relation to induction. I will then contrast falsificationism with confirmationism.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sigmund Freud’s theory of the unconscious and his method, psychoanalysis are a manifestation of revolution against the psychology of his time. And, Karl Marx’s ideas are also in contrary to the perception of society of the pre-Marxist era. Both philosophers have a common ground of thinking from which their thinking grows which can be summarized in three statements: (1) of all one must doubt (omnibus est dubitandum); (2) I believe nothing human to be alien to me (nihil humanum a mihi alienum puto); (3) the truth shall make you free. The first statement corresponds to the general mood of the modern era, to doubt all things that the senses perceive the hearsay, and the beliefs of the ancient and medieval time. All of the things that were assumed as true are all put to subjection for doubt.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bermuda Triangle: Pseudoscience? Coined by philosopher, Karl Popper, ‘Pseudoscience’ is a term that is prevelant and used to describe theories or even fields of study that appear scientific but are not authentically so. Much like scientific claims or theories, pseudoscientific ideas also stem from curiosity of the humankind. They tend to use seemingly scientific jargon to rationalize concepts but are often scarcely refutable and are devoid of experimentation and evidence. This essay aims to bring out the flaws in pseudoscientific claims through the example of the Bermuda Triangle and demonstrate how and why this concept is not scientific. For many years together, the mysterious disappearance of ships, planes and even two nuclear submarines in and over the region popularly called the Bermuda Triangle (or the Devil’s Triangle) has fiddled with human curiosity and compelled our race to make repeated attempts at unravelling this mystery.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction This essay will compare and contrast two theorists who were considered to be the founding fathers of their area of psychology . Sigmund Freud who was the founder of psychoanalysis and Carl Rogers who founded the humanistic approach. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) was a physician who specialized in neurology and eventually devoted his life to the treatment of mental disorders using a procedure he developed called psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis states that all behaviour is driven from the unconscious mind and early childhood experiences, this approach brings up emotions from the hidden mind for analysis. (Carl Rogers (1902-1987) was a Humanistic psychologist.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compare and contrast Psychoanalytic Theory to that of Social Cognitive Perspective and the Humanistic Perspective. Also, tell me who are the primary psychologists who came up with each theory/perspective? Sigmund Freud was an influential psychiatrist and clinical psychologist. Freud began his work when he found that the disorders of the patients he was seeing made no neurological sense. What could be causing feelings that had no physical cause?…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freud Vs Watson Essay

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sigmund Freud and John B. Watson are two of the most famous pioneers of psychology. Though they had different ideas of how the human mind worked, the two had similar theories on human behavior. Sigmund Freud's’ background in biology, physiology, and neurology influenced his work in the field of psychology. Freud founded the branch of psychology known as psychoanalysis. He studied neurological reasons for people's behaviors, theorizing that people's phobias and mental illnesses stem from traumatic experiences in their pasts that are now hidden in the consciousness.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Popper points out that the methodology of psychoanalysis does not fit the criteria of being scientific. Psychologists use information to replicate their studies to make sure that the results attainted are not by chance. This is by justifying the results of a research and replicating the studies using different methods so that the hypothesis becomes a theory Comer et al. (2013). Researchers use a set of principles and methods to draw up a theory which can be tested by developing a study and collecting data.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Science Vs Pseudoscience

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First and foremost, we will need to establish the differences between science and pseudoscience. Science and pseudoscience are two completely different things. Science deals with our understanding of the physical world around us. With science, we make observations that cause us to form theories as to why certain things happen. We then actively try to disprove or falsify those theories.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays