He defines the power structure in his “Wage Labor and Capital” as a power differential between the bourgeoisie (the capitalistic class) and the proletariat (working class). In order for the bourgeoisie to maintain their power, the bourgeoisie created a power imbalance to keep the proletariat class oppressed. When taking sonnet eighty-seven into this account for oppression, lines four and five exemplify this: “My bonds in thee are all determinate. / For how do I hold thee but by thy granting,” The writer here is admitting to having a power over the apprentice in a binding, perhaps by a mutual agreement. But it was this binding that has expired and should end, despite a selfish motive as per wanting to keep the apprentice. This is particularly directed towards Marx’s concept of voluntary oppression, where the proletariat class allows for this suppression willingly, accepting and acknowledging this power
He defines the power structure in his “Wage Labor and Capital” as a power differential between the bourgeoisie (the capitalistic class) and the proletariat (working class). In order for the bourgeoisie to maintain their power, the bourgeoisie created a power imbalance to keep the proletariat class oppressed. When taking sonnet eighty-seven into this account for oppression, lines four and five exemplify this: “My bonds in thee are all determinate. / For how do I hold thee but by thy granting,” The writer here is admitting to having a power over the apprentice in a binding, perhaps by a mutual agreement. But it was this binding that has expired and should end, despite a selfish motive as per wanting to keep the apprentice. This is particularly directed towards Marx’s concept of voluntary oppression, where the proletariat class allows for this suppression willingly, accepting and acknowledging this power