Kant Law And Order Analysis

Great Essays
Kant would resolve the conflict seen in Law and Order by adhering to the duty principle by testing a maxim of the conflict against his three formulations. These formulations are used to see if a rule is a categorical imperative – that is, a rule that is in tune with the moral law and is acted out of a pure will. Basically, these categorical imperatives are rules that are absolutely universal and unconditional. On the other hand, the impure will comes out of a hypothetical imperative. This is a rule that is conditional and mixes reason with desires and feelings and is concerned with the goods and ends of a decision. To find the side with the pure will that follows the categorical imperative, he would first determine what the maxim of the mother’s …show more content…
Based upon the third formulation, which is to treat people as ends and never merely as means, Kant would see a conflict. To explain, the mother did not want to vaccinate her child because she was afraid of the deadly side effects that could come with it. Yet, the opposition’s argument against the mother was that by not vaccinating her child, she was exposing unvaccinated babies to measles. Basically, the opposition was disregarding the mother’s own personal beliefs about her reasoning behind not vaccinating, and was basing their reasoning on the sad feelings that could come as a result of the situation. Because of this, the opposition was merely using the mother as a means and not as an end. In other words, the opposition neglected the mother’s motive behind not vaccinating her child and simply wanted her to vaccinate her child because it would stop the spread of measles in other children. Thus, the opposition was “using” the mother as a means to get her child vaccinated, rather than treating her as an end, by not considering the long-term side effects that the vaccination could bring. The conflict of this maxim, then, is that by saying that one should vaccinate his/her child, the people who do not want to vaccinate their children are being used as means or a resource to accomplish this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He cites several facts and statistics showing the relation of the increase of nonmedical vaccination exemptions and the increase in diseases. He begins his essay with one of these statistics, stating that the amount of measles cases have drastically risen from 2000, when it was pronounced eradicated, to “a record 644 last year, and 102 last month” (Omer). He credits this rise to the “parents who refuse vaccinations for their children” (Omer). By making this claim with the support of the measles statistic he is able to create a ‘so what’ element to his article: nonmedical vaccinations are at least part of the reason the measles outbreaks are occurring, we need to stop them here’s how.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ETHC-445 Principles of Ethics Final Exam http://uphomework.com/downloads/ethc-445-principles-ethics-final-exam/ 1. (TCOs 2, 4, 5, 6) The idea that the assisted suicide of terminally ill patients should be allowed simply at the patient’s direction reflects what type of ethics? (Points : 5) Hobbes’ State of Nature…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After all, most people would not like their children suffering from terrible diseases. But unless everyone is immune from a disease as contagious as measles, just one person contracting it can set off a chain reaction that leads to many others catching it. Being given a choice between a world in which everyone is immune against bad diseases such as measles and mumps as children – thus preventing them from ever contracting these terrible illnesses, and a world in which children are not vaccinated against such diseases – thus putting everyone in danger of contracting them, every person would choose the first…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, ending in Kant’s objective which was to “search for and establish the supreme principle of morality.” Kant believed everyone should be just as concerned for morality as he was including in moral truth. Kant introduces imperatives, and furthers this when differentiating hypothetical imperatives, and categorical imperatives. Kant also explains categorical imperatives in relation to “acting on maxims.” Kant’s ideals paved way for understanding the…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second formula of Kant’s Categorical Imperative illustrates that to be a moral it is necessary to treat every human being as an end, never as means. Regarding the sexual relationship of the human being, if someone does not seek her partner’s consent to be engaged in sex, he then humiliates his partner by considering her merely as means. In fact, his behavior is equivalent to a rapist because none of them get consent from the opposite, therefore is immoral. But, this sort of philosophical thinking does not go hand in hand with the religious thinking. Hence, I would like to discuss that Islam, one of the major religions on the planet, seems to be reluctant about the consent of women at the time of intercourse.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Kant

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And, to act out of respect for the Moral Law is to do the right thing because it is the right. Again, what Kant thinks is important from the moral point of view is the motive of the agent. To see how motive is important to Kant (and to see what it means to say that one is acting from duty), it is useful to look at the various ways one can act in accordance with duty (and thus perform the right action).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s belief on the right of punishment is grand and far reaching. To him, the right of punishment is a supreme power of the government. The government has only the right to punish those who have committed a crime; no punishment may be ordered “merely as a means for promoting another Good” of society or an individual (355). Punishing an innocent man breaches the principles of justice; only criminals (of both private and public crimes) are to be punished. Kant warns us that the Penal Law is a categorical imperative—it is unconditional and non-circumstantial.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pros Of Mandatory Vaccination

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    The health of the global population should always come before all else, considering that a person must be alive in order to hold religious or moral beliefs (Parkins 440). Choosing not to vaccinate a child effects not only that child, but also everyone around him or her. For example, Gillian Hodge, a mother from Virginia, had to endure a grueling 30-day quarantine after her newborn baby girl caught measles at her doctor’s office (Parkins 439). Baby Mackenzie, who was too young to receive her MMR vaccine, caught measles from an unvaccinated child. She was then quarantined so that she would not spread the highly contagious disease (Parkins 439).…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the principle of deontology, it is an “approach to ethics focused on duties and rules” (Rich, 2016). From this perspective, violations of duties and rules, or categorical imperatives, are unacceptable regardless of the anticipated outcomes (e.g. shooting an abducted passenger plane is always an immoral thing to do and it violates the moral norm to not kill others) (Gawronski, 2016 ). Kant proposed that people should follow a universal, unconditional framework of rules as a guide to know the rightness of actions and one’s moral duties (Rich,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant imposes the idea of the “purity of the will” which expands on the principle that one should act…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Measles Virus Essay

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Health officials are actually blaming the recent spread of the virus on those that do not get vaccinated. These people are often referred to as “anti-vaxxers” (“The Measles Outbreak”). Patricia Smith expresses that, “Vaccination isn’t a private choice but a civic obligation.” Parents that do not vaccinate their children claim that they are worried that it will lead to autism, a serious disease, or later complications in the child’s life. Patricia Smith interviews a California mom who voices that “She doesn’t want so many toxins entering his body.”…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Moral Philosophy

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral philosophy is the study of moral judgments or value placed on decision about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or on just. Business philosophy is the standard, principle or policy placed on who may behave outside the norms of organizational culture, emphasis upon ethical behavior enables employees to know how they should react when faced with ethical dilemmas and the consequences of their actions. MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY. As an individual, I believe that keeping a low profile life is very vital to me in a sense that people around me irrespective of their cultural, ethnical and political background.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays