Rhetorical Analysis Of Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson

Improved Essays
Surname 1 Author

Tutor

Course

Date

Frisking

The essay “Just Take Away Their Guns” has been written by James Q. Wilson. The essay tends to highlight the political and social concerns that are associated with the carrying of a gun. The author claims that there is no need of civilians carrying a gun since it is the responsibility of law and order unit to keep security of citizens. He argues that, in case civilians are involved in the act of carrying guns, then it makes no difference amid them and criminals. Although the author’s argument that individuals need guns in order to defend themselves seems convincing, he does not offer sufficient evidence to persuade the audience that police frisks will help in resolving the problem of gun violence
…show more content…
The frisking argument provided by the author tends to focus almost exclusively on its legality, but fails to provide an instance where similar policies have successfully been applied to resolve the issue at hand or to decrease the number of illegal guns that existed in a certain region. Also, Wilson fails to provide reasons why he supports the idea of frisking and why it will work. Indicating how the alternative works is not sufficient enough to convince the audience to embrace the option in decreasing gun violence. Thus, the argument of frisking proposed by the author seems week and ineffective in controlling illegal guns or decreasing gun …show more content…
This is not the reality because police frisks can turn rough where a person may even be shoved against a police patrol vehicle. Furthermore, the author persuades the audience to support the argument and assumes that the reader will not be a likely target. This is because he indicates that the targets will be individuals on probation or parole or people belonging to a gang that is known to deal with drugs or assaults. In this manner, Wilson appeals to the audience to embrace his argument, but there are no enough reasons why his claims should be supported.

Conclusion

The author assumes that the solution of police frisking will help to resolve the issue of gun violence in a better way compared to gun legislation. With the complete dismissal of gun control advocates and failure to highlight the consequences of police frisking, the argument made by the author is weak as well as ineffective. The frisking argument provided by the author tends to focus almost exclusively on its legality, but fails to provide an instance where similar policies have successfully been applied to resolve the issue at hand or to decrease the number of illegal guns that existed in a certain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Campus Carry

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Timothy Hsiao’s journal entry “Firmin DeBrabander: Do Guns Make Us Free?”, the author reviews Firmin DeBrabander’s arguments on the controversy regarding the campus carry bill passed in several states, including Texas, which raised the question of whether campus carry is truly effective in decreasing gun violence on campus. In order to put the controversy into context it’s necessary to raise the question on whether the evidences DeBrabander provided were credible or not, and why or why not. To acquire answers to these questions, Hsiao’s entry is an important source to consider as it analyzes the errors in DeBrabander’s argument. The author believes that “DeBrabander’s critique of gun ownership is extremely narrow” and fails to consider and provide empirical data and other forms of evidence to support his argument, thus making it difficult to…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “How US Gun Control Compares to the Rest of the World”, John Donohue shares his stance on the controversial issue of gun control in the United States. Mass shootings are only a small part of the overall violence in America, however, as time passes, this issue continues to worsen and is becoming a greater problem in the US than in other countries. Other industrialized nations have harsher gun laws that have prevented many different types of crimes. US states and cities have enacted laws to require unused guns to be safely stored, which helps keep guns away from criminals and children. People argue that stored guns can’t be used to defend themselves, but studies have proven that guns are very rarely used as self defense mechanisms.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The invention of the gun detector would produce a difference in the efforts to get illegal guns off the streets. Wilson’s essay was full of great facts to back up his stance on stricter gun control laws. The statistics Wilson used regarding the number of illegal guns used to commit crimes was an excellent way to promote his argument. However, his idea of random street frisking had numerous faults in it, including harassment, racial profiling, and abuse of compensation. Overall, his point that instead of disarming law-abiding citizens, the government should be more focused on finding ways to get illegal guns off of the street is commendable.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control Everyone has their opinion over Guns, many believe it’s ok to have guns but others disagree. But many have guns for protection, I understand people abuse the power on having guns and commit a crime. Many shootings have occurred this year and last year.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fact that people could get stopped at anytime is a huge deterrent to possible criminals. This strategy is so effective that in New York City from 1990 to 2009 the murder rate dropped a tremendous 82% (MacDonald, Heather). This large drop is account to less guns as "guns were used in 61 percent of all homicides, but 86 percent of black males between the ages of 16 and 21 killed that year died from gunfire, according to N.Y.P.D. data." (MacDonald, Heather). When compared to places like Chicago and San Diego it's a wonder why stop-and-frisk isn't used in every big city.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This proves that people in the United States need to go into a more mental health checkup before they can go out and purchase a weapon. Others say that they do not need to go under investigation before purchasing a weapon because they know how to own and operate their weapon in a responsible manner. Another way to help with the gun violence in America is to " insist on mandatory training and licensing along with safe-and secure gun storage" ("Gun Violence").This is saying that people have to have training and a licensing before they can own a weapon. The people will have to have a safety training and licensing before owning a weapon. The cities can also take a stand by "supporting city wide planning…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The majority of McMahan’s claims are based on the fact that guns should be outlawed because we should not need them. However, all one has to do is compare McMahan’s claims to situations in the world around us. The first example the author makes is that “when most citizens are armed, as they were in the Wild West, crime doesn’t cease” (391). This argument is easily rebutted as his claim is based upon events that have taken place over one-hundred years ago. This claim does not take into consideration the improvements in law enforcement as well as the Judicial system that have taken place since the days of the ‘Wild West’.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Furthermore, through the events of the University of Texas shooting, it is evident the significance of arming the law-abiding citizens so that they can utilize the weapons for the precise intention they were invented for. In continuance, the vast majority of Americans take advantage of their right to possess guns and many of these households contain children. These circumstances in addition to the tragic prevalence of school shootings recently make it all the more important for children to be educated on gun safety techniques. Comparatively, although statistics propose that gun related homicides involve perpetrators who know their victims, the results fail to confirm the assaults were not self-defense. Moreover, the assault weapon bans enacted in 1994 did not affect a large proportion of violent crimes because criminals have a tendency to commit their crimes using handguns.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns vs People “ Guns don’t kill people; people kill people”. It is a phrase often heard among the opponents to gun control in the United States. Weapons have been seen as an element of subsistence or defense against any threat, and every day we hear or see related violent crimes involving firearms.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The stop-and-frisk police tactic allows officers to search suspicious people and their belongings to find illegal weapons or contraband. Supporters of stop-and-frisk insist that this strategy is responsible for getting guns and illegal drugs off of the street, and they also say this tactic has decreased crime rates (“Police Brutality”). If police did not use this tactic, criminals would be roaming the streets among innocent people, and they would bring potential danger along with them. Often times when an arrest is being made, the suspect tries to escape the officer; in order to ensure that the criminal does not get away, force has to be used. Force is not only for criminals, but also people who cannot do as their told by authority.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays