Rhetorical Analysis Of Just Take Away Their Guns By James Wilson

888 Words 4 Pages
Surname 1 Author

Tutor

Course

Date

Frisking

The essay “Just Take Away Their Guns” has been written by James Q. Wilson. The essay tends to highlight the political and social concerns that are associated with the carrying of a gun. The author claims that there is no need of civilians carrying a gun since it is the responsibility of law and order unit to keep security of citizens. He argues that, in case civilians are involved in the act of carrying guns, then it makes no difference amid them and criminals. Although the author’s argument that individuals need guns in order to defend themselves seems convincing, he does not offer sufficient evidence to persuade the audience that police frisks will help in resolving the problem of gun violence
…show more content…
The frisking argument provided by the author tends to focus almost exclusively on its legality, but fails to provide an instance where similar policies have successfully been applied to resolve the issue at hand or to decrease the number of illegal guns that existed in a certain region. Also, Wilson fails to provide reasons why he supports the idea of frisking and why it will work. Indicating how the alternative works is not sufficient enough to convince the audience to embrace the option in decreasing gun violence. Thus, the argument of frisking proposed by the author seems week and ineffective in controlling illegal guns or decreasing gun …show more content…
This is not the reality because police frisks can turn rough where a person may even be shoved against a police patrol vehicle. Furthermore, the author persuades the audience to support the argument and assumes that the reader will not be a likely target. This is because he indicates that the targets will be individuals on probation or parole or people belonging to a gang that is known to deal with drugs or assaults. In this manner, Wilson appeals to the audience to embrace his argument, but there are no enough reasons why his claims should be supported.

Conclusion

The author assumes that the solution of police frisking will help to resolve the issue of gun violence in a better way compared to gun legislation. With the complete dismissal of gun control advocates and failure to highlight the consequences of police frisking, the argument made by the author is weak as well as ineffective. The frisking argument provided by the author tends to focus almost exclusively on its legality, but fails to provide an instance where similar policies have successfully been applied to resolve the issue at hand or to decrease the number of illegal guns that existed in a certain

Related Documents