Analysis Of Just Take Away Their Guns

Decent Essays
In James Q. Wilson’s essay “Just Take Away Their Guns," he expresses how more authoritarian control over guns would not have the best outcome in comparison to actually implementing methods on reducing illegal firearms on the street. Wilson argues that in order to fulfill a peaceful nation, there would have to be a nation wide sequestration of firearms. Although, that could potentially solve and reduce crime, it would also be infringing on the rights of a lot of gun owners. Perhaps more importantly, the right to self defense would be limited, as most people use a weapon as a means of self defense. While making more stringent laws regarding guns could be a potential way of reducing crimes, firearms will, and always be a means of protection when it comes to self defense. Furthermore, a criminal is unlikely to obey any new law pertaining guns, as statistics show their means of getting guns is unlawful. …show more content…
Wilson argues, the “legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” due to the amount of criminals who have access to illegal weapons that swamp our streets (Wilson). The author starts out by including statistical information regarding the amount of guns in the United States which comes out to an average of “200 million guns in private ownership”. He also list the ratio of lawfully purchased guns to lawfully purchased guns used in crimes which shows “one-sixth of the handguns used by serious criminals are purchased from a gun shop or pawnshop” (Wilson). With that being said, criminals will always find other means of getting their hands on guns. According to James, “Most of these handguns are stolen, borrowed, or obtained through private purchases that wouldn 't be affected by gun laws”

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime. The other side of the coin argues that more gun control would lead to less violence, and this is the argument that the article “GUN CONTROL AFTER HELLER AND MCDONALD: WHAT CANNOT BE DONE AND WHAT OUGHT TO BE DONE”, by Gary Kleck, takes.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In answering these questions, we need to investigate all viewpoints, compare, and analyze them. Some people believe that having gun laws will prevent criminals from getting guns; however, this law will also mean law abiding citizens will not have access to gun. Some people also believe that gun control will have minimal effects because if criminals wanted guns, they will get them regardless of the law. Even though guns are considered a lethal weapon and therefore very dangerous, we need to educate ourselves and learn how to manage them properly so that we can acheive its benefits or use it strictly for their purpose. Guns are not the problem, people are.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It can violate the 2nd amendment, which is of course “right to bear arms.” There has been so much in the media about gun control. The majority of the media does not show what concealed and carry is capable of in a positive way, but only the negative. People believe gun control is there to have their guns seized. There are more than enough restrictions on guns, so there for the majority of people that can have guns are safe to be around. This proven claim shows my thesis is correct by having restrictions on guns, is not stopping criminals from obtaining illegal guns, but only making it more difficult for innocent, clean slate civilians to possess…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We don 't need footnoted statistics to know the truth of that"(Geer,2014). One would want to have a weapon just incase the oppertuinty arose and having stricter gun laws might make the person very cautious when going out. So now one can see that having stricter gun control laws would not make crime better ,but ultimately make it…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin with, guns are not safe. There are those people who believe that guns have no role in the hands of people, if we don 't have gun control, anyone can easily get guns. It is dangerous that if the people who don’t have enough knowledge of using guns. Gun owners are more dangerous than others who don’t have weapons, even though the gun owners are victims of the crimes. Similarly, guns can cause unintentional crimes.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Susan Milligan, a writer for US News, stated, “Opponents of any kind of gun restrictions argue that they are meaningless, since criminals by definition don 't follow the law, and therefore won 't allow gun laws to hamstring their criminal behavior. That 's true. But gun violence isn 't only committed by classic criminals, as recent gun-related tragedies show” (Milligan, “We Need Gun Control to Stop More Than Criminals”). Although it is irrational to believe we can stop all the criminals from committing acts of gun violence, it is realistic to believe that by banning firearms we can stop everyday people from acting alike. In practically all circumstances of mass murder, the perpetrator is a seemingly average person who snaps and has firearms accessible, by banning guns we 'd be preventing these type of cases from occurring.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why we should not have stricter gun control law is because the problem is not adding more gun laws that will not solve the solution to why we have deaths or guns falling to the wrong people. With or without gun control law; criminals will still get a hold of one. Instead of trying to enforce more gun control laws, we should focus on educating the people about the safety of gun usage and by owning a gun does have the advantages of protect not only oneself, but your…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics