Analysis Of Just Take Away Their Guns

Improved Essays
In James Q. Wilson’s essay “Just Take Away Their Guns," he expresses how more authoritarian control over guns would not have the best outcome in comparison to actually implementing methods on reducing illegal firearms on the street. Wilson argues that in order to fulfill a peaceful nation, there would have to be a nation wide sequestration of firearms. Although, that could potentially solve and reduce crime, it would also be infringing on the rights of a lot of gun owners. Perhaps more importantly, the right to self defense would be limited, as most people use a weapon as a means of self defense. While making more stringent laws regarding guns could be a potential way of reducing crimes, firearms will, and always be a means of protection when it comes to self defense. Furthermore, a criminal is unlikely to obey any new law pertaining guns, as statistics show their means of getting guns is unlawful. …show more content…
Wilson argues, the “legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” due to the amount of criminals who have access to illegal weapons that swamp our streets (Wilson). The author starts out by including statistical information regarding the amount of guns in the United States which comes out to an average of “200 million guns in private ownership”. He also list the ratio of lawfully purchased guns to lawfully purchased guns used in crimes which shows “one-sixth of the handguns used by serious criminals are purchased from a gun shop or pawnshop” (Wilson). With that being said, criminals will always find other means of getting their hands on guns. According to James, “Most of these handguns are stolen, borrowed, or obtained through private purchases that wouldn 't be affected by gun laws”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The second persuasive point made is stronger gun laws will keep guns out of the wrong hands. In this article the author stated some supportive evidence “Because of this private sale loophole, convicted felons and other prohibited people are able to buy guns” this is logical because criminals find ways to obtain guns one way or another and “Studies have shown that a gun in the home increases the risk of firearm related death or injury” this logical because guns in a home increases the risk of an accident. The authors concluding idea is that they want gun control laws to be much more strict in terms of not just selling to anyone, but to also perform a background check and to make sure they are able to posses a gun legally and…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America’s crime rate is at an all time high. Citizens do not feel safe in their own environments. Placing stricter laws on gun control can help reduce these unfortunate circumstances. The federal law does not…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “How US Gun Control Compares to the Rest of the World”, John Donohue shares his stance on the controversial issue of gun control in the United States. Mass shootings are only a small part of the overall violence in America, however, as time passes, this issue continues to worsen and is becoming a greater problem in the US than in other countries. Other industrialized nations have harsher gun laws that have prevented many different types of crimes. US states and cities have enacted laws to require unused guns to be safely stored, which helps keep guns away from criminals and children. People argue that stored guns can’t be used to defend themselves, but studies have proven that guns are very rarely used as self defense mechanisms.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan argues that the United States should ban private gun ownership almost entirely. His most crucial claim is that general gun ownership does more damage to the U.S. than it prevents. Therefore, banning private gun ownership would minimize the amount of occasions where a gun could potentially be used for harm. In this paper, I will reject these claims presented by McMahan because the banning of private gun ownership would not inevitably lower crime rates.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frisking The essay “Just Take Away Their Guns” has been written by James Q. Wilson. The essay tends to highlight the political and social concerns that are associated with the carrying of a gun. The author claims that there is no need of civilians carrying a gun since it is the responsibility of law and order unit to keep security of citizens. He argues that, in case civilians are involved in the act of carrying guns, then it makes no difference amid them and criminals.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stricter Gun Control Laws

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A lot of people think that taking away guns will make it impossible for a criminal to get and gun and that it will also lower crime rates involving weapons. “The Proposition you can vicariously control criminal or psychopathic behaviour by confiscating private property and burying law-abiding citizens under a mountain of regulations is absurd” (Falco,…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law should be followed however there are always those who deviate from the mean. Outlaws and criminals will find ways to get guns, and if we the American people will…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And if it does, do laws that put restrictions on the ownership of guns reduce gun-related crimes? These are the questions that many of our representatives in Congress are asking themselves when they go about voting on gun control laws. The debate about gun control versus the right to bear arms is not new and has been here for many years and it still trudges on today. As seen through this paper, gun control is a complicated issue with many different points…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don’t enforce them, people are gonna find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It’s not the law-abiding citizens, it’s not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). There are around 100,000 victims of gun violence each year (“Brady Campaign...”). Action needs to be taken so Americans don’t feel unprotected going into a public environment.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics