John Locke's Political Ideologies

Improved Essays
POT3302
POT 3303 Political Ideologies
John Locke’s vision of individual rights, rights of rebellion The scholar John Locke opines that a government bears the mandate to serves its people by protecting their life, liberty and their property. In his view, governments should not endorse the tyrannical rule of law; instead, the dispersion of authority should include excising the rule of law that serves all people (Aaron, 2011). Thus, he supports the decision to protest or rebel against any form of government that violates individual rights. In his view, the protests or rebels are justly before any legal presentation. Locke vouches for thinkers of liberty with individual example cases like Thomas Jefferson and Algernon Sidney. According to the undistinguished Oxford scholar, a designated body instills the political power, which is, the natural power bestowed top every man. In this view, communities or societies surrender their inherent power to a ruling body that is the government. As a result, the government bears the responsibility to protect these said rights at any given time (Aaron, 2011). Consequently, Locke states that any government that violates the compact of these protection rights should be eliminated without fail. Importantly, he advises that
…show more content…
Similarly, he advocates for a responsible government that respects the will of the people. In many of his example, Locke opines that the respect for the people by a liberal government should treat people with the same regards (Grant, 2010). This aspect of liberalism is that it should enact and enforce laws that guarantee the individual freedom and liberty. In his proposals, liberalism also entails changing any form of government at will if the ruling body infringes the people’s rights. Under such a circumstance, a liberal party listens to its people with the aim to safeguard their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 1651, Thomas Hobbes wrote the Leviathan explaining that all individuals are created equal, everyone has the right to be free, and you cannot rule another person without their consent. Hobbes would reach the conclusion that for the sake of people’s security they must grant power over themselves to a sovereign ruler. John Locked was another significant figure in the revision of liberalism. In his book Second Treatise of Government he would defend society 's right to overthrow any government that was no longer legitimate. Locke explains that as population grows we need government to protect us from infringing on other 's rights.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community. In order to guarantee the loyalty of its members, the law should also appropriately protect the individual freedom of its people. In regards to Mill, it appears that he somewhat agrees with Rousseau’s argument of the function of government. Mill argues for a representative democracy that would facilitate the development and evolution of liberty for its members. He believed that a representative democracy would only represent the interests of its people and would therefore lessen the resistance between the ruler and its people.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So if a monarch, or other authority infringes upon any of these rights they have cast away their own entitlement to said rights. It is in these instances, where a ruling body decides without input from the persons mentioned; that Locke believes war is justified. However, Locke does not believe that war is something that should be practiced often, and he also believes that there are other ways to ensure the rights of each individual. This is the true reasoning behind society and governments, and by extension the definitive guideline to how a ruling body should be formed. Not by chance, power, or subjection but by the people that are to be governed, because these governments’ sole purpose is to protect each citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The beginning of state of nature meaning war. Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14).…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The term “unalienable right” refers to rights that people are born with that cannot be given or taken away. Natural human rights. I think that Jefferson found it important to assert this because the colonists felt that the British government was trying to take away their unalienable rights. After he asserts that these are rights that everyone has, he uses the rest of the paragraph to explain how these rights should be protected by government.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He wanted to show the importance of supply and demand and how it was important to profit. The government Smith would be most accustomed to is John Locke’s ideal government. Locke had a supply, the natural rights of the people, and a demand, the government that all of the citizens accepted. The profit that comes from that supply and demand is the striving society. Locke believed that the government should be in the favor of the people, and according the Smith, the government should stay away from business affairs, which is in the favor of the people.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke: I let you speak without interrupting you, please reciprocate that same level of respect. As you previously stated, mankind fails to cooperate with one another, in this case, how will all individuals within a community subjugate to a rule of government that forces them to give up violence, what you say is their security? Hobbes: Of course there will be outliers within a community that would rather not renounce their violent lifestyles and this is all the reason why a Leviathan government is crucial. The government may use necessary means to force these outliers to give up violence. Locke: Force?…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke believed in a limited, representative government while Rousseau believed in a direct form of government by the people. Locke believed that the powers of the government are to be limited. He believed the government should only exist to protect life, liberty, and property and if the government were to overstep that authority, then the public would have a right to overthrow the government. As I said before, Thomas Jefferson paid homage to these ideals during his drafting of the Declaration of Independence. Along with separation of powers between the House of Commons and House of Lords,2 Locke’s ideals greatly influenced American government where power is vested in a bicameral legislature along with an executive and judicial branch.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke describes what an individual gives up in civil society in chapter 9, and states that an individual gives up “the power of punishing and engages his natural force, (which he might before employ in the execution of the state of nature”. (67, §130). The concept (vigilantism) does not exist in society because institutions exist for that very purpose. Locke spends the next sections discussing how the different branches of government, the legislative, executive and federative, function. The legislature should be the most powerful branch, and the laws it produces should apply equally to everyone.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays