Analysis Of John Jay's Essay '5th Federalists'

Decent Essays
John Jay completes his “concerning dangers from foreign force and influence” essay in the 5th Federalists Paper. Jay begins his essay by quoting Queen Anne of England. In 1706, she wrote a letter to the Scotch Parliament considering unifying the England and Scotland kingdoms that if the two kingdoms were unified, it would “be the solid foundation of lasting peace: It will secure your religion…the jealousies and differences betwixt our two kingdoms.” With this unification, they would “be ENABLED TO RESIST ALL ITS ENEMIES." Jay concluded that being unified country would strengthen the government and lessen dangers from abroad. He used the diversity of Great Britain as an example to his argument against dividing the Colonies to serval independent

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Samuel Seabury and Alexander Hamilton’s exchange debates the logic behind the colonists’ desires to spilt from Great Britain and reveal that Seabury presents a by far more logical argument for the continued relationship between Great Britain and the colonies. Samuel Seabury’s “A View of the Controversy between Great Britain and her Colonies” is a response to Alexander Hamilton’s “A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress, from the Calumnies of their Enemies.” In fact, the dialogue between Seabury and Hamilton extends even farther back to Seabury’s “Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress.” All of Hamilton’s and Seabury’s communication centers around the debate of whether the colonies should break from Great Britain. Both Hamilton and Seabury were residents of the colonies, but disagreed greatly, as will be proven throughout this paper, as to whether the colonies should secede.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example one of his key pieces of evidence is the union of Scotland and England. He chose this because the…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The battle to ratify the constitution quickly fell into two camps; the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists defended ratification of the constitution as it was written with the Anti-Federalists arguing against ratification for a number of reasons. The battle lines had been drawn, however, the arguments were far from consolidated; especially within the camp of the Anti-Federalists. Additionally, both sides took to media outlets to argue their positions where the written word on the argument of ratification played heavy on the side of the Federalists. Arguments against ratification brought forth by the Anti-Federalists were many and centered primarily on a long standing hostility to a stronger central government.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fight for independence was defiantly not one of simplicity, but one of great distress, hardship, and catastrophe to bring liberty among the American colonies. Outstanding efforts by colonist and their leaders proved that the decision to gain freedom from Britain led to what is now an independent country governed by the citizens of the United States. In The Speech at the Virginia Convention, Patrick Henry addresses the leaders of the community that the issues with Britain should not be taken peacefully but that the colonist should prepare for war if their needs are not met. Alongside, The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson states the colonies reasons to separate with Britain and declare war for their independence. Conclusively,…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of his reasons that America should be independent is that they were already at war with the British. In his section “Preventing War”, he is saying that freedom from the British empire would only make the relationship with America and Britain better. Because the Britians and the Americans are already at war, America becoming independent and letting the british continue their monarchy rule would only prevent the current war between the two colonies from getting…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    James Madison, on the other hand, reasoned that the best government of the time, as it existed in Britain, and all of the colonies already practiced the same overlapping of powers that was found in the proposed constitution. In Federalist 48, Madison argues that it is this very overlapping of authority that preserves the separation of powers; “The conclusion which I am warranted in drawing from these observations is, that a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands” (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 494). He believed that his opponents had read Montesquieu but had not understood his notion of separation of powers clearly. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government simultaneously holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (Hammond, Hardwick, &…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His main points are such: that the limited land and resources of England forced corruption to spawn, America has great potential to make the most of the land that is accessible…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logical Appeals Essay In Federalist 51, by James Madison, there are several examples of the classical appeals ethos, logos, and pathos that strengthen the Madison's point and allow him to get across his point far easier. The appeals not only pull the reader further into James Madison's opinion with emotion, but with common sense, and logic. Federalist 51 explains the importance of separation of powers, checks and balances, and what each branch needs to do in order to be successful. James Madison, displays the classical appeal logos, when, in the first sentence of the second paragraph he states that the different and distinct powers of government are "essential to the preservation of liberty." (Pg. 113)…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The framers of the Constitution were visionaries who sought to establish a limited representative government which not only restricted the powers of an existing government, but also safeguarded the rights of the minority through restricting majority rule. A republic, they believed, would be the only form of government in which the liberty of the people could be preserved. Greatly influenced by the 17th century British philosopher John Locke, who advocated for the protection of natural rights of man by entering into a social contract, separation of governmental powers, and individuals’ right to consent to being governed, the founding fathers were able to incorporate such teachings into the Constitution of the United States. The American founders…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    North Carolina Oppression

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Oppression is common throughout history; resistance is common, also. North Carolina finds its place in the American narrative both as a British colony and later as a state, but it has its own individuality in how that transition was made. While many fellow colonists viewed the inhabitants of North Carolina as backwards or simple, this did not impede the development of a culture that was slowly becoming more diverse and growing as immigration drastically raised the population over the course of several decades. Through the mid-eighteenth century, the inhabitants would have certainly recognized their identity as part of the colony, but unification was mainly only governmental. Those who had immigrated from England, Ireland, Scotland, and Germany…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is the minds of powerful and brilliant thinkers from every era of history that have led to the world we live in today. James Madison made a positive impact on the United States through his many political actions. During the Constitutional Convention, Madison created the Virginia plan. While he was the secretary of state, he acquired the Louisiana Territory. While he was the fourth president of the United States, he lead the country defiantly against the British during the War of 1812.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays