• Home Page
  • Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau And Hobbes

Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau And Hobbes

Improved Essays
Show More
It is widely believed by people that the Hunter Gatherers, people who hunt and physically work for their food and resources, 73,000 years ago had bad morals and could not follow simple rules. This is proven incorrect by the facts Katherine Milton gave in her article about her time spent in the Brazilian Amazon and the people who live there and still live with a Hunter Gatherer society today. Jean-Jacques Rousseau is a philosopher from France who made allegations about what the Hunter Gatherer society was like and how they behaved. Similar to him, there was Thomas Hobbes a philosopher from England who also made claims on what it would be like 15,000 years ago before Homo sapiens made the switch to an agricultural society. Genesis also made cases on what it would be like back then and how the people behaved. Although Genesis is most commonly known for being the first book in The Bible, it talks about the Garden of Eden and how Adam and Eve were living their lives as Hunter Gatherers. The claims from Rousseau, Hobbes and Genesis about the morals of the Hunter Gatherers are all incorrect, except for Genesis they are proven wrong from the articles “Hunter Gatherers of Amazon Brazil” by Katherine Milton and “Memories of a !Kung Girlhood” by Marjorie Shostak. Those articles talk about facts and not speculations like Rousseau and Hobbes. …show more content…
The Hunter Gatherers actually had good morality and would share, if someone killed an animal for food they could not be greedy and only give it to their family, they would share with the town so everybody got a meal that day. Rousseau said that the Hunter Gatherers would keep the food for themselves, and they might get violent with one another if they did not share and if there was not enough resources. It is inaccurate to say that they Hunter Gather society had little to no morals and were violent towards one

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Rousseau And Thomas Hobbes
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Rousseau And Thomas Hobbes

    In addition, Jean-Jaques Rousseau thought that everyone should give their freedom to society. In document 3, Rousseau says that every person “gives their freedom to the general will, but they also become part of the general will and have the same power as everyone else”. He wanted equality and argued for a direct democracy, which is very similar to how we do things today. He believed people are born good, but are corrupted by power, so power should be distributed evenly so chaos does not occur.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Summary Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau And Mary Wollstonecraft
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau And Mary Wollstonecraft

    In the seventeen hundred, there were different thoughts on what women are expected to do. Such issues are made on the questions of why women were created and what their duties are in society. However, in the twentieth century, there are no longer as any women issues as there was back then. One of the big issues back then was that woman were not to be treated equally to men. This was specifically talked about by two enlightenment thinkers named Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau's First Discourse
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rousseau's First Discourse

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Eating Animals: An Ethical Analysis
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Eating Animals: An Ethical Analysis

    In the 2014 British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) article, “Ethics Guide: Eating Animals,” it examines three different ethical perspectives – the rights argument, the consequential (utilitarian) argument, and the virtue argument – against the rearing and killing of animals for human consumption in layman’s terms primarily for the average contemporary reader in Anglo-American societies (such as Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom). Furthermore, the BBC, a leading worldwide media corporation, contends that the process of rearing, killing and eating animals is “morally wrong” or unjustifiable because these acts disregard the rights of the animal to live by its own interests. Its aim is to inform the reader of these perspectives so…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes Manifesto Of The Communist Party
    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of Thomas Hobbes Manifesto Of The Communist Party

    Although Hobbes, in his work “Leviathan,” and Marx, in his work “Manifesto of the Communist Party,” both discuss conflict¬¬¬— they differ about the ideal society, the main source of conflict, and the use of conflict generally. Many philosophers have differing views when it comes to the topic of an ideal society; Hobbes and Marx are no different. While Hobbes believes humans should seek to achieve a peaceful society free from conflict, Marx states that the ideal society is a society free from class. Marx believes history has a path that calls for a communist, a classless, society (p. 490)—meaning, humans have gone through various types of economic systems such as industrialism and feudalism.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau On Human Nature
    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Rousseau On Human Nature

    (Rousseau, Chapter 1). Moreover, Rousseau imagined that humans turned rational and selfish once the vices of civilization and their interactions with…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Difference Between Hobbes Locke And Rousseau
    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Difference Between Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Hobbes
    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Age Of Enlightenment
    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Age Of Enlightenment

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau born on June 28, 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland is a philosopher, composer and a writer of the 18th century. His political philosophy inspired the Age of Enlightenment in France and across the Europe. He said he is going to challenge social fabric of the 18th century and will stand up for the people. He considered all people to be good and wise; which led him to work for the benefit of them. He also, argued that the government’s priority should be to protect freedom, equality and justice for all even though the majority rules…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Views Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Karl Marx
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Views Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Karl Marx

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau
    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and explaining the way that Hobbes and Rousseau’s ideas regarding the national condition of human beings differ. In my exegesis, I will be discussing how in Leviathan (ch. 13), Hobbes takes a stance regarding egoism, the idea that man always acts in their own interest. I will also be discussing the fact that Rousseau is fundamentally opposed to the ideas in which Hobbes presents. Rousseau believes that society taints the fundamental core beliefs of mankind. I will then present the critical point of this paper: the fact that the two philosophers have very conflicting viewpoints on the concept of human nature.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau
    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Is The Difference Between Hobbes And Rousseau
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Is The Difference Between Hobbes And Rousseau

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis

    Society is a collection of individuals living in an ordered community that provides protection for all who reside in it. However, individuals do not directly consent to this system, but rather give tacit consent. As such, the question must be asked: “What was the period called before tacit consent was present in society?” Many political philosophers, such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau have called the period before society “the state of nature.”…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings