Analysis Of Ibn Rushd And Thomas Aquinas Essay

1573 Words Nov 3rd, 2016 7 Pages
Ibn Rushd and Thomas Aquinas are two medieval philosophers. While they come from different religious backgrounds, both Rushd and Aquinas sparked a more accessible dialogue in their respective faiths of Islam and Christianity. In order to do this, Holy Scriptures were incorporated into each work to provide a legitimate foundation for their logic. These medieval philosophers emphasized that it was in fact the duty of the members of each faith to engage in rational thought to better understand God.
Aquinas wrote his treatises a century after Rushd’s time. Both philosophers affected different areas of the world, Ibn Rushd ancient Spain and Aquinas Medieval Europe. The key concern of this age was the role of philosophy in a religious society, the study emerging into the spotlight. Religious people were uncertain of the relationship between this earthy knowledge and divine knowledge, questioning whether or not this natural logic conflicted with God’s revelations. Both Ibn Rushd and Aquinas formulated their own interpretations of how faith and reason coincide with one another, Ibn Rushd in The Decisive Treatise Determining the Nature of The Connection between Religion and Philosophy and Aquinas in Summa Contra Gentiles, however each text has different forms to do so. Thus, while they share similar content in their work, both philosophers believe in different ends of philosophical knowledge. Ibn Rushd attempted to understand the metaphorical interpretations of his rational ideas…

Related Documents