I Have A Dream Analysis Essay

Analysis of I Have a Dream by Martin Luther King, Jnr. The choice of Martin Luther King is rationalized by one thing; his personal character, which encapsulates everything he stands for. There is no disputing that King’s character speaks strongly of action-based leadership; in essence, practicing what you preach. However, King’s practice of what he preaches does not convey a man swayed into violence simply because he has been oppressed. Rather, it speaks sturdily of a man who believes in answering injustice in a non-violent manner. This is greatly shown in the statement “we must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence” that directly speaks of a leader who believes in dialogue. The inspiration behind the choice of King’s I Have a Dream speech is firmly grounded in the ideals of social justice and equality. The US constitution, a great pillar of America’s democracy, dictates under the Fourteenth Amendment that no citizen of America, or any person residing within its jurisdiction, shall be deprived of the right to life, liberty, or property; that all men, in spite of their color and social standing, are equal, deserving of equal treatment and protection before the law. King’s speech is therefore an eternal living embodiment of how these …show more content…
The qualification for this assertion is the existence of certain similarities both in the person of the two authors, and in the spirit that characterizes the contents of their pieces. Both authors are from an African American background. In both, the character of selflessness is evident. For example, upon graduation, King began leading a church. On the other hand, Kakutani (2006), states that prior to his presidency Obama was a community organizer and a civil rights lawyer in Chicago. The import from this supports the assertion that both authors had firm grounding in the problems ailing the American